You free tonight?

200 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world

10 Comments

OwOarchist@pawb.social · 15 pts · 7d (2 replies)

Remember to leave your phones at home. These things track nearby phones.

A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 7d (1 reply)

Leave them at home but do not turn them off

chaogomu@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 7d

Play music for your pets. That way you have data traffic.

Waterpumpee@lemmus.org · 13 pts · 7d (6 replies)

Genuine question; if you'd cover the camera with some sort of bag. You are not damaging property. Could they still charge you with obstruction? Obstruction of what?

Aqivex@fedinsfw.app · 12 pts · 7d

Uh. Well, if we're assuming they're still forced to pretend?

Obstruction of justice or anything relating to impeding an investigation.

All they would need to do is just pick any of the ID hits on anything coming from an adjacent node in the network from any direction, say they had probable cause to bel--

Why the fuck am I still writing and risking giving them ideas?

The answer is just yes.

They would charge you and it would be a flimsy piece of bullshit that you might or might not escape the justice system without too much harm from. Because they still gotta pretend, but not that hard.

If things get kept to just placing bags atop them and access to them isn't prevented utterly through whatever means, eventually they won't have to pretend.

TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 7d (4 replies)

If the cameras are rented by the police, they could try to get you on obstructing police business. This hasn't been tested yet afaik though, so the charge might not stick

village604@adultswim.fan · 2 pts · 7d (3 replies)

It'll probably be tested in a small town where the police chief and judge are cKlan buddies.

chaogomu@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 7d

The main reason I leave the cameras alone. My small town police force is corrupt as fuck.

DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 6d (1 reply)

You accidentally put a c instead of a K

village604@adultswim.fan · 2 pts · 6d

Thank you!