Don't want to support fashtech and stay sane? Use filter lists

But I'm still happy to take part in converstaions that criticize this fascist's arch-based vanity distro!

What is omarchy? I never read that word before.

You'll never guess what's posted immediately below this in my feed

How ironic that you posted this and thus caused people to talk about the technology you want to give no attention to.

Friendly reminder that lamenting your native country losing its identity and making you a minority is not inherently xenophobic, racist or fascist. Would you want that to happen to you?

Not trying to defend DHH per se but I think people are twisting words around and blowing things WAY out of proportion to fit some narrative. I've read the posts in question and he has not actually called for any violence nor wished anyone to get hurt. He has not claimed anyone doesn't have a right to exist. Not everyone is the best at articulating their thoughts properly, and we shouldn't default to assume the worst possible intent. Without actually talking to the guy and getting real clarification, I'd say it's a bit too dangerous to make such wild sweeping claims like I keep seeing.

Or this one:

When gypsies take over public spaces, you deport them.

Let's rephrase this a different way:

"When illegal immigrants overwhelm a city, you deport them"

How do you know that's not all he meant? People are taking great liberties interpreting subjective terminology here.

If you're going to have a kneejerk reaction and act like only your opinion matters and nothing could possibly change it, well that's not reasoned and rational debate, is it? Just downvote and move on I guess if you disagree with me.

Also, the irony of people on lobsters hating on the guy while their own site runs on Rails, seems completely lost on them.

Usually, yes—if your goal is to change their mind. Internet arguments often reward winning, performance, and group approval more than honest reconsideration.

It can still be worthwhile when:

- Someone else might learn from the exchange.
- The claim could cause real harm if left unchallenged.
- The person seems curious and is engaging in good faith.
- You can provide a concise correction with evidence and then stop.

A useful rule: make one clear point, support it briefly, and watch their response. If they ignore evidence, shift the goalposts, insult you, or repeat the same claim, disengage. You don’t have to attend every argument you’re invited to.