This is a friendly place. Please don't brim-shame

via Shen Comix - https://nitter.d420.de/shenanigansen

314 points · 14 comments · view on lemmy.world

14 Comments

BrudderAaron@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Big-hat Logan has Invaded your world.

Hyggyldy@sffa.community · 4 pts · 2y

Far more intimidating than Little-hat Steve.

Omgarm@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y

The best tailor in the world hopes nobody challenges them to a magic duel.

MisterMcBolt@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y (7 replies)

It’s also true for witches!

ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de · 0 pts · 2y (6 replies)

We need a gender-neutral term

panda_paddle@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 2y (1 reply)

In a lot of fantasy the terms are already neutral and only denote magical specialty. Witch - magic user, with a familiar, specialized in potions Warlock - magic user, specialized in the demonic Wizard - magic user focused on pure magic

DrQuint@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y

And Sorcerors dedicated to coming up with new Magic. Hence the Source-ror thing.

... yes this joke is stolen. Yes. From there.

sbv@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I feel like we've dropped gender for wizards in D&D. I've seen a few homebrew witch classes that are gender inclusive.

explodicle@local106.com · 4 pts · 2y

That's how I've been playing it for years. Witches are folk hedges, barely closer to wizard than druid.

Hyggyldy@sffa.community · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Witchards?

McScience@discuss.online · 1 pts · 2y

Witchtards if you will

Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y (2 replies)

My gnome wizard would like a word.

kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

How wide's that brim, gnome?

Whirling_Ashandarei@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

Not very wide, only 2 levels wiz 😔