Just API calls to GPT

632 points · 16 comments · view on lemmy.world

16 Comments

Knecht@feddit.de · 57 pts · 3y

Every damn time. At work I got in contact with several "AI startups" and only after directly asking if they're just relying on Open AI they finally admitted that they are.
You could really tell they where trying to keep things vague before that.

nave@lemmy.fmhy.ml · 50 pts · 3y (1 reply)

That’s why my startup uses GPT-4!

Dragon_slayer_hunter@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3y

💸

dsdsds13@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 3y (4 replies)

But our proompts are highly prooprietary

Hexarei@programming.dev · 27 pts · 3y

Because we hired the best proompt engineers money could buy

MrAusnadian@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 3y

Wait til they learn AI can provide AI prompts

speaker_hat@lemmy.one · 9 pts · 3y

Pooprietary

branchial@feddit.de · 9 pts · 3y

Oh no my proompting my AI model again

Edgeburn02@lemmy.edgeburnmedia.com · 31 pts · 3y (5 replies)

OpenAI should really do something about the apps that are just ChatGPT clones with a subscription on it

Hexarei@programming.dev · 47 pts · 3y

I mean. They're paying OpenAI for API access to run those clones so OpenAI isn't complaining lol

genfood@feddit.de · 42 pts · 3y (2 replies)

That’s the way OpenAI makes money 💰

dontblink@feddit.it · 11 pts · 3y (1 reply)

It's theirrr trreasuuree

wave@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 3y

closedAI

bitsplease@lemmy.ml · 38 pts · 3y

Why on earth would they "do something" about them? Companies doing that is literally OpenAIs business model lol

They only gave the public direct access to chatGPT to drum up excitement for it, the monthly subscriptions from people using chatGPT+ are nothing compared to the API fees from big companies