I see this so often, but I don't understand it. Some people just fork a huge amount of repos and never commit anything to them. What's the point? Are they trying to pad their profile for potential employers or what?
It just clutters your active repos. Personally, I just remove forks once my PR gets merged upstream. And I only fork when I'm ready to push a commit.
Is there something I'm missing?
10 Comments
hperrin@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 2y
I’ve forked a couple projects that I just wanted a copy of in case the upstream is deleted.
atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml · 6 pts · 2y
this is my reasoning also
thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y
Can't you clone a previous build? Actual noob here, serious question
hperrin@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
I’m not sure what you mean, but if someone deletes their GitHub repo, there’s no way to fork it. If you forked it before they deleted it, then your fork remains.
thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y
I see, thanks
sim642@lemm.ee · 28 pts · 2y
They might not have always been empty. Could be that there was a branch for a PR that got merged, so the branch was deleted.
Luci@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 2y
I fork the version I deploy in prod across multiple machines. I find it makes my life easier and I never need to learn any cli other than git clone and git pull.
onlinepersona@programming.dev · 9 pts · 2y
In my case, it's a TODO list. But often, life gets in between and I forget.
danielsiepmann@friendica.daniel-siepmann.de · 5 pts · 2y
sirdorius@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y
Why not use stars in this case?
danielsiepmann@friendica.daniel-siepmann.de · 5 pts · 2y
Sigmatics@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 2y
Tbf forks should be separated in the repo view on GitHub from repos you've created