@letsmakeafriendship I would love to see even more spending on cycling infrastructure. We're already a pretty good city for cycling (we're no Amsterdam, but pretty amazing by US standards) but why not throw more money at it?
Ditto. Cycling infrastructure, and maybe a fleet of cheap bikes anyone can use for free, like Amsterdam has (if I recall correctly). Would probably cut down on bike theft a lot, by removing the customer base.
6 Comments
NotBadAndYou@ttrpg.network · 17 pts · 2y
Public Sex Forest???
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
I'm not letting the city buy my private sex forest and eminent domain can kiss my balls
kescusay@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
That one caught my eye, too.
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 2y
The Bureau of Land Management already maintains tons of public sex land.
ch0ccyra1n@emeraldsocial.org · 5 pts · 2y
@letsmakeafriendship I would love to see even more spending on cycling infrastructure. We're already a pretty good city for cycling (we're no Amsterdam, but pretty amazing by US standards) but why not throw more money at it?
kescusay@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
Ditto. Cycling infrastructure, and maybe a fleet of cheap bikes anyone can use for free, like Amsterdam has (if I recall correctly). Would probably cut down on bike theft a lot, by removing the customer base.