c/196 · by seaQueue@lemmy.world · 2yWhat could go wrong giving the Inte(r)net (u)nfi(l)ter(e)d access to DallE 3? 350 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world
17 Comments
dingus@lemmy.ml · 54 pts · 2y
xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink · 23 pts · 2y
dingus@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 2y
It turns out humans were the real monsters the whole time!
xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink · 50 pts · 2y
rynzcycle@kbin.social · 38 pts · 2y
My fellow Americans, one hour ago I authorized a Navy Seal strike on a pineapple under the sea.
Aye aye Mr President.
MotoAsh@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y
cr3w@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 19 pts · 2y
new conspiracy theory just dropped
seaQueue@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 2y
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 2y
A lot of pron I think
Vuraniute@thelemmy.club · 9 pts · 2y
microsoft's content safety algorithms with dall-e 3 are strict as fuck, though
tryagain@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y
My grandmother, who passed away last week, kept a beautiful portrait over her fireplace of the goatse guy flying a jet into the twin towers.
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 2y
That's why the post mentions unfiltered.
Vuraniute@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 2y
but the access we have to dall-e 3 isnt unfiltered?
dingus@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 2y
Not with that attitude.
Vuraniute@thelemmy.club · 2 pts · 2y
what does that mean? is there a way to circumvent it i havent heard of?
cr3w@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 2y
why do you think that? /s
SpunkyMcGoo@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
the funniest thing is that i don't think i've seen a single person actually be offended by it, but everyone thinks that people will get offended by it
Chemical@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y