Sharing this graph casually is rather unhelpful despite your note, since most casual observers aren't going to observe the scale change in the X axis, and instead will see only that today is similar to the 12,000 years ago segment.
Fun tidbit: I read somewhere that a few years ago people needed to sit down and come up with a new worst case scenario for global warming because we hit the previously predicted worst case (and I think exceeded it too.)
Best case is out for sure. Worst case is also looking unlikely thankfully. Probably we’re in for a rough ride but not end of civilization level event. Though that’s still possible which is concerning. Normally you’d think good governance would keep the probability of world-ending catastrophes extremely low. So while those things may be unlikely, they’re still way too possible for us to get comfortable.
When the ocean start boiling, then we'll deal with it. We will do so by having a conference in Geneva that state leaders fly private jets to, that'll help.
14 Comments
silence7@slrpnk.net · 35 pts · 2y
Definitely a classic. Follows closely what's in the academic literature
(note that this graph changes x-scale for the past 1000 years)
Avanera@kbin.social · 13 pts · 2y
Sharing this graph casually is rather unhelpful despite your note, since most casual observers aren't going to observe the scale change in the X axis, and instead will see only that today is similar to the 12,000 years ago segment.
Tigbitties@kbin.social · 28 pts · 2y
I think I remember seeing this 5-6 years ago and think we're past the "best case" senario.
Whitebrow@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y
Fun tidbit: I read somewhere that a few years ago people needed to sit down and come up with a new worst case scenario for global warming because we hit the previously predicted worst case (and I think exceeded it too.)
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 2y
Best case is out for sure. Worst case is also looking unlikely thankfully. Probably we’re in for a rough ride but not end of civilization level event. Though that’s still possible which is concerning. Normally you’d think good governance would keep the probability of world-ending catastrophes extremely low. So while those things may be unlikely, they’re still way too possible for us to get comfortable.
Jimbo@yiffit.net · 17 pts · 2y
Reminder that this was made in 2016 and we are already around +1°C global average. We are welll past best case scenario already
echodot@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 2y
When the ocean start boiling, then we'll deal with it. We will do so by having a conference in Geneva that state leaders fly private jets to, that'll help.
sik0fewl@kbin.social · 17 pts · 2y
Should I be concerned?
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 25 pts · 2y
Yes.
londos@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
If we face this problem head on, if we listen to our best scientists, and act decisively and passionately...I still don't see any way we can survive.
lemmy_see_your@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 2y
"Last North American Pokemon goes instinct" - had a good chuckle at that.
Seriously though, humanity should get it's head screwed on straight. This is going way too fast for evolution to cope with.
DieguiTux8623@feddit.it · 7 pts · 2y
Killed me 😂 The message is really alarming but that little humorous detail made my day.
BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 2y
I like the Spinal Tap reference!
Doodah@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y
I came here to post the same.