Meta now lets you block Instagram from collecting your data - SamMobile

https://www.sammobile.com/news/block-instagram-collecting-data-personalized-ads/

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2378301 (!android@lemdro.id)

cross-posted from: https://lemdro.id/post/2377997 (!meta@lemdro.id)

86 points · 15 comments · view on lemmy.world

15 Comments

Showroom7561@lemmy.ca · 35 pts · 2y (10 replies)

But Meta forces you to have an account to view content, which is already privacy-invading enough.

And shame on the businesses and organizations who only use these platforms to update their customers/members.

ijeff@lemdro.id · 7 pts · 2y (5 replies)

We need a nitter for everything.

kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com · 5 pts · 2y (4 replies)

We have a lot of them tbf https://libredirect.github.io/

ijeff@lemdro.id · 1 pts · 2y (3 replies)

I use lots of these but I don't think we have one for Instagram though, no?

kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com · 1 pts · 2y

There used to be one called Bibliogram, but they stopped development a while ago https://bibliogram.art/

EngineerGaming@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
nave@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
Polkira@kbin.social · 6 pts · 2y (3 replies)

It's like every business in my city, I hate it. Want to check out a restaurants menu before trying it out? Look on Facebook. Need to call a business or check holiday hours? Contact info is on Facebook. Makes not having Facebook a huge barrier. Heck even my union basically only communicates over Facebook aside from the occasional email. 😑

Showroom7561@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I can't join our local BIKE CLUB because they only post events, and group happenings on FB, and I refuse to get back on that platform.

Any company or org that claims to be accessible needs to stop posting exclusively on locked-in social media platforms. That's the opposite of accessible.

Polkira@kbin.social · 4 pts · 2y

Ugh right? I'd love to join a local plant club but they're all only on Facebook.

Substance_P@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

My thoughts and frustrations exactly.

MDZA@feddit.uk · 13 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I’m sure this is entirely out of Meta’s concern for user privacy and not the looming EU regulations on tracking required to be opt in rather than opt out.

tabular@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y

The benovolence.

praise_idleness@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 2y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
cheese_greater@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

You need to start opening ur piehole re:the Pihole question

ram@bookwormstory.social · 8 pts · 2y (1 reply)

So, what if they purposely turn your feeds to shit, and have an obnoxious ad at the top of every screen saying:
Don't like your feed? Change your privacy settings to make it more personalised!

vector_zero@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y

YouTube does exactly that if you disable your watch history. Or rather, they just disable video recommendations on your home page altogether.

TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y

The company known for stealing and selling your data is giving the option to not do it? Yeah right! Placebo switch. Meta: "Turn it on and hope we don't sell your data anyway because there is no law saying we cant and we will just get a small easy to pay fine for it anyway if there is."