c/noncredibledefense · by nuke@yah.lol · 2yThere is literally no downside 470 points · 28 comments · view on lemmy.world
28 Comments
rustyfish@lemmy.world · 56 pts · 2y
You might not know this, but that’s how early humans hunted birds.
nuke@yah.lol · 51 pts · 2y
If God had wanted them to live he would have given them explosive reactive armor
ChicoSuave@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2y
There wasn't much meat left after the primary detonation would pierce the soft flesh of the bird but it's tradition.
Zehzin@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y
There must have been some real big birds back then for them to need rocket launchers
NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee · 17 pts · 2y
More oxygen, bigger bugs, bigger birds.
Neanderthals built the first Buick. It was the only way to take down the giant ants. The birds were relatively easy.
Agent641@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
This is why the Big Bird species is nearly extinct
Land_Strider@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y
It is normal when the dinosaurs hunted like this in ancient times:
MaggiWuerze@feddit.de · 7 pts · 2y
That's how I look after Mexican food
PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
We're these birds also known as dinosaurs?
Diplomjodler@feddit.de · 39 pts · 2y
Aiming is for losers!
fluxion@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 2y
Aiming is still important obviously, but when you start training on these from the age of 6 years old it becomes just as accurate as the older non-atlatl versions
figaro@lemdro.id · 6 pts · 2y
Ah yes, at our rocket launcher class for 6 year olds
photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 2y
You didn't have one? Oh man, those were a blast! A shame little Timmy got his nuts blown off, but hey, that class was worth it!
figaro@lemdro.id · 4 pts · 2y
His nuts are a sacrifice I am willing to make
GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 25 pts · 2y
I've never held an rpg-7, but what I know of Russian engineering is that it must be so well balanced and fly so true.
nuke@yah.lol · 51 pts · 2y
Truly unparalleled precision
(Cross cut BMP barrel)
skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de · 48 pts · 2y
it's called asymmetrical warfare, look it up westoids
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 2y
What are you complaining? You get 3mm more material for free on 1 side!
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net · 10 pts · 2y
Holy shit
teft@startrek.website · 9 pts · 2y
What you’ve never heard of variable bore artillery? This lets the round juke while in flight. /s
nuke@yah.lol · 9 pts · 2y
Firing a Russian BMP [REAL] [UNEDITED]
InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
I'm conflicted because I'm quite fond of that moment when someone you love tucks your hair behind your ear, but maybe less so using a bullet.
RattusInox@kbin.social · 8 pts · 2y
Does the thick part go at the top to prevent barrel-droop?
Or am I overthinking it?
RattusInox@kbin.social · 3 pts · 2y
Does the thick part go at the top to prevent barrel-droop?
Or am I overthinking it?
arrr@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 2y
No, it's for protection against overfly top attacks from NLAWs.
PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y
That's why you need higher engineering safety margins! Then it doesn't matter how square your barrels are!
fosforus@sopuli.xyz · 22 pts · 2y
StrangeName@feddit.de · 8 pts · 2y
That's basically how they launch rockets in Attack on Titan.
Bananable@feddit.nl · 6 pts · 2y
The Henry Stickmin.