PSA: Don't tell Western doctors/therapists that you're a Leftist. The American Psychological Association (APA) classifies anti-capitalists, animal rights advocates and environmentalists as terrorists.
https://twitter.com/hash_tigre/status/1438645734467792901
2 points · 9 comments · view on lemmy.world
9 Comments
SupportTransPeople@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 4y
right-wing extremists: we must exterminate blacks and gays
left-wing ‘extremists’: free health care and trans rights
i hate nazis so much it's unreal
xarvos@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 4y
Wtf supporting environmental causes is extremist now?
arcane@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 4y
They're talking about the people that spike trees so lumber workers may get injured, or burn down labs where animals are being tested on.
Jeffrey@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 4y
I'm pretty sure they're talking about people engaging in direct action like fighting with / firing on the police in opposition of an oil pipeline, or destroying GMO crops. The wording of the article is bad; I don't think anyone in their right mind would consider donating to an animal hospital or picking up trash in the park to be extremism.
Emberleaf@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 4y
lunatichacker@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 4y
wiping the slate clean is anti-marxist🙃
Jeffrey@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 4y
Can confirm. I have seen leftists proudly display the communo-anarchist Gadsden flag which implies aggression and violence. These are almost always the same leftists who own guns and advocate for violent revolution & punching fascists.
The report says "two thirds [of violent extremists were] from the far right, about a quarter from the far left, and the remainder were driven by religious or 'ethnonationalist' causes". Violent leftists are absolutely real, and no one should pretend they do not exist. Change requires uncertainty, fear, and discomfort, but violence is optional. The ends never justify the means, the ends are the means.
ree@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 4y
Nobody read the article and now everyone is angry and scared at the big evil psychologist.
It focuses on what's hapenning in the US and capitol events.
And here is the full quote about anti capitalism
So if ou want a take home message it's that violence define radicalization.
Source : https://www.apa.org/monitor/2021/07/cover-domestic-extremists
jazzfes@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 4y
I think the problem people see is more with creating an equivalence of political opinion and mental health.
The full quote about anti-capitalism doesn't say anything about what makes someone an extremist. It doesn't say anything about rational criticisms and irrational ones it just relates political attitudes. It doesn't say anything about how we would separate rational criticism from extremism. That is a problem, no?
The take home message doesn't help at all when a dissident deals with an oppressive system. E.g. how would that message be applied in Germany in 1933? Or 1939? Or 1942? I don't think it can at all. How would it be applied to say US intervention, or colonisation? Again, I don't think the message would hold up.
Do you think that the scientific method is applied here in an appropriate way?
ree@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 4y
Thanks for answering.
First i wanted to adress that the title of this post is bullshit. The article is merely about psychologist telling other psychologist how they are relevant to understand radicalization.
You're right about the quote it's just explaining what left extremism is about there is a paragraph for the 3 identified category : religious, left and right.
The take home message was about the article and this ill-informed post.
Now for my opinion: I don't think you should expect anything about a discipline which classify deviance in a big red book with statistical procedure (see DSM).