I wouldn’t even have minded if they charged something reasonable. But the way they priced was clearly to drive third parties away. Such a cowardly move
Hell, if they would have taken a moment and listened to feedback regarding it AT ALL perhaps it would be a different story. In the end greedy people gon greed I guess
8 Comments
httpjames@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 3y
He's shocked because Lemmy charges a total of ✨$0 ✨ for API access
iam@lem.dru5k1.com · 16 pts · 3y
u/spez has left chat
johnthedoe@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 3y
I wouldn’t even have minded if they charged something reasonable. But the way they priced was clearly to drive third parties away. Such a cowardly move
caffinz@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 3y
Hell, if they would have taken a moment and listened to feedback regarding it AT ALL perhaps it would be a different story. In the end greedy people gon greed I guess
RobBanks@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 3y
✧･ﾟ: ✧･ﾟ: Limmy on Lemmy :･ﾟ✧:･ﾟ✧
Willer@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 3y
Goofy ah text based online service charges 25 bagillion dolars.
*Meanwhile whatsapp before 2014
ehrenschwan@feddit.de · 2 pts · 3y
Do you think meta's threads will have an open api?