"investigate possible instances of discrimination of broadband access, work to solve andâwhen necessaryâpenalize companies for failing to meet the obligations defined in the rules."
So the FCC could investigate where the billions for rural deployment of broadband have gone and why it's going slower than a snail in molasses? Or investigate the legitimacy of ISP's keeping municipal broadband from happening?
15 Comments
Vash63@lemmy.world · 64 pts · 2y
In other news thieves say police shouldnât investigate theft.
M500@lemmy.ml · 23 pts · 2y
Drug dealers say that police should not investigate the floor boards in the attic.
Aidinthel@reddthat.com · 30 pts · 2y
I was surprised to see this wasn't an Onion headline.
Deebster@programming.dev · 7 pts · 2y
Yeah, I thought this story would have been posted under !nottheonion@lemmy.world
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
I've done so lol
Deebster@programming.dev · 2 pts · 2y
Haha, nice. I'm your 75th upvote there.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
/madam/miss/other đ
SinningStromgald@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 2y
So the FCC could investigate where the billions for rural deployment of broadband have gone and why it's going slower than a snail in molasses? Or investigate the legitimacy of ISP's keeping municipal broadband from happening?
If so then this new rule sounds amazing!
FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 2y
FCC better investigate the shit out of that!
Weslee@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 2y
I wonder why...
Matthew@programming.dev · 17 pts · 2y
"Local man says police should not investigate wife's disappearance"
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2y
Breaking news: tobacco companies say the FDA shouldn't investigate cancer
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 2y
Fades@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y
Reprehensible. You are a fucking utility in private enterprise clothes
nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info · 5 pts · 2y
say should not investigate