Because vdL just had to try that shit again after she failed in Germany. She doesn't seem to be tremendously into surveillance etc. in general (or you'd see her pushing it also with the usual terrorism etc. justifications) but she really, really, has a hangup about CSAM to the degree that the ignores victim organisations.
15 Comments
bedrooms@kbin.social · 53 pts · 2y
right to e2ee should go into constitutions
flei@feddit.de · 6 pts · 2y
As if that would stop these fascists behind the efforts for mass surveillance from trying again and again and again...
evening_push579@feddit.nu · 44 pts · 2y
Send a message to your representative and let them know you are happy with that decision! Encourage them to making similar decisions in the future :)
tillimarleen@feddit.de · 28 pts · 2y
I‘m cautiously optimistic!
PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de · 26 pts · 2y
Why did we even had to discuss that in the first place?
geissi@feddit.de · 29 pts · 2y
Because the Commission proposed it.
barsoap@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 2y
Because vdL just had to try that shit again after she failed in Germany. She doesn't seem to be tremendously into surveillance etc. in general (or you'd see her pushing it also with the usual terrorism etc. justifications) but she really, really, has a hangup about CSAM to the degree that the ignores victim organisations.
SoaringDE@feddit.de · 15 pts · 2y
Hey all,
I'm from germany but not good with how these EU politics work. Is there a way to see what party voted for or against chat controll?
aes@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y
I couldn't find specific votes, but if you follow this source I'm sure you'll find something
LIBE, European Parliament
manucode@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 2y
Here are the voting records of the LIBE committee from that day
Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -1 pts · 2y
probably
nope@jlai.lu · 8 pts · 2y
Nice
scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org · 5 pts · 2y
What font is that?
hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 2y
HELL YEAH
LudwigvanBeethoven@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
Called it