Features
- Support multiple shells: bash/zsh/powershell/fish/nushell/elvish/xonsh
- Support multiple platforms: windows/macOS/linux
- Built-in completions for 1000+ commands (full list)
- Automatically generate completion script from help-text/man-page
- Lazy completing, lower memory consumption and faster startup time
4 Comments
NixDev@programming.dev · 4 pts · 2y
Have you used this? Is there any benefits over bash-completion?
Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 2y
I've not used it yet, but I found bash-completion to be lacking quite often. Completion is one reason I'm using fish atm.
But from the looks of it it's exactly what bash/zsh is missing for me.
cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
Have you tried ZShell? I'm consistently amazed at the number of great plugins that get made for it.
Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 2y
I've used zsh for it's support for posix sh and have my config. But I find fish to be faster with the features I want and it has those features ootb.
Maybe I'll give zsh another try.