Iowa Satanic Temple display not protected by First Amendment, Catholic legal expert says

https://archive.ph/E93cL

17 points · 3 comments · view on lemmy.world

3 Comments

Glitchington@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y

Almost like there might be some sort of conflict of interest.

Altan1903@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y (1 reply)

“The first principles that support these core freedoms like religious freedom and free speech did not embrace a farce like The Satanic Temple is trying to put on display. Nor does it protect irreligious mockery of these kinds of core and important celebrations,” she went on.

Well as a Calvinist (not really but bear with me) my impression is that her Catholic religion makes a mockery of Christianity, and I could call her a heretic. Can I get her opinion removed from the public discourse then, following the same logic? Iowa is mostly protestant, isn't it? /s

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 2y

Can I get her opinion removed from the public discourse

Yes, please! Not because she's a catholic, of course. Because she's a dumbass spreading misinformation in an effort to fight against the two most important parts of the first amendment.

VampyreOfNazareth@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]