I’m a very old school computer graphic guy, 1980 onward. I can tell you that the same was said about computer graphics in general. It was considered even ‘less’ artistic than photography. But then, food for thought, one of the primary goals of computer graphics was to create ‘photorealistic’ images. Just like painting in the 60s and 70s. So everyone was imitating everyone.
A sculpture professor once dismissed some of my students’ art as being ‘as simple as pressing a button’.
It’s all art. None of it is lazy. Even lazy art is sometimes intentionally so.
Some TO-92 like package. Maybe nice expensive foil dudes.
Absolutely. Thanks!
Dad? Is that you? Get off the Internet, it’s not for old people.
Oh, only one pic attached. Here’s the other
We were together for 14 years. They were serious partners in crime. We’ve started to rebuild the herd with a new rescue - Guillermo
My former co-idiots. And by co I mean with me added to that list
Cool thank you very much
Could you let us know who did the caps and maybe give us a closeup or two for quality assessment?
Ufda. Growing pains. I hope it resolves for you soon…
Am using !plex@lemmy.ca
I’m a very old school computer graphic guy, 1980 onward. I can tell you that the same was said about computer graphics in general. It was considered even ‘less’ artistic than photography. But then, food for thought, one of the primary goals of computer graphics was to create ‘photorealistic’ images. Just like painting in the 60s and 70s. So everyone was imitating everyone.
A sculpture professor once dismissed some of my students’ art as being ‘as simple as pressing a button’.
It’s all art. None of it is lazy. Even lazy art is sometimes intentionally so.