They needed to get it together 10 years ago. I‘m no expert of course but they‘re in need of a do over of some sort. Neither party of theirs will do them any good.
What makes you think that? They pay traitors of other nations a one time sum to spy for them and give them secrets. Has nothing to do with what they pay their trainers.
I don‘t think that comparison works either because you get a new phone for completely unrelated reasons than the door but you only get new keys under rare circumstances. The new phone scenario probably happens more than 5 times as frequently.
It‘s so disheartening to see intelligent and somewhat tech savvy people around me buy into it. They treat these things almost like they‘re living beings and offload more of their own thinking capacity to chatbots. No amount of explaining how this is just one of countless publicity stunts can convince them. They‘re acting like I‘m the one who just doesn‘t understand technology while they‘re letting word salad influence how they think or even IF they think.
The housing bubble that popped in china wiped out twice as much capital for Chinese citizens as the 2008 housing and banking crash in the world. Their standards of living have been decaying since 2020 and there is no sign of improvement honestly. Quite the opposite as tariffs, lower exports, automation and the AI craze drive unemployment.
I’m concerned this will allow China to become even more totalitarian and militarized because they won‘t fear sanctions as much anymore. But on the other hand they won‘t crash the entire world economy when they invade a neighboring nation that way. You lose some you win some but ultimately we‘ll have to see and wait how it plays out.
I’ve heard dynamic contracts used to be wide spread in Germany but I haven‘t seen one in the wild for as long as I live. I guess it makes sense smart meter adoption is slow when there‘s no real benefit.
I too think we‘re long past the point of calling games that released as recent as 15 years ago retro because they simply don‘t evolve in the speed they used to.
Imagine looking back at 1993 when you’re in 2008. Yeah, that’s a huge leap in technology. But look back at 2011 now and you realize that stuff doesn‘t feel nearly as ancient.
From all I know a game needs to be at least 20 years old to be considered retro these days. That‘s the most common definition you will find these days.
Ah, so you figured out our government is made of hypocrite millionaires. Whenever they say something vague that kind of makes sense at first they usually mean the exact opposite.
Different countries have different type of costumers that are willing to pay different prices. The platform might also be much more popular in some countries vs. others. Amazon has figured this all out by collecting tons of data.
This is also highlights why we need to push back against dynamic pricing. Because it‘s this on steroids.
Right now both are losing points in polls and Merz has no interest in dissolving the Government with such useful henchmen to do their bidding. He might step down but will be replaced by someone from his party. All the while left and greens gain traction against the common main stream media narrative.
They needed to get it together 10 years ago. I‘m no expert of course but they‘re in need of a do over of some sort. Neither party of theirs will do them any good.
I didn‘t know they made a show of this but I guess that‘s just what they do with any franchise now.
What makes you think that? They pay traitors of other nations a one time sum to spy for them and give them secrets. Has nothing to do with what they pay their trainers.
I don‘t think that comparison works either because you get a new phone for completely unrelated reasons than the door but you only get new keys under rare circumstances. The new phone scenario probably happens more than 5 times as frequently.
With SpaceX we actually have a company that has a real incentive to wreck the planet and that should have everyone concerned.
It‘s so disheartening to see intelligent and somewhat tech savvy people around me buy into it. They treat these things almost like they‘re living beings and offload more of their own thinking capacity to chatbots. No amount of explaining how this is just one of countless publicity stunts can convince them. They‘re acting like I‘m the one who just doesn‘t understand technology while they‘re letting word salad influence how they think or even IF they think.
The housing bubble that popped in china wiped out twice as much capital for Chinese citizens as the 2008 housing and banking crash in the world. Their standards of living have been decaying since 2020 and there is no sign of improvement honestly. Quite the opposite as tariffs, lower exports, automation and the AI craze drive unemployment.
I’m concerned this will allow China to become even more totalitarian and militarized because they won‘t fear sanctions as much anymore. But on the other hand they won‘t crash the entire world economy when they invade a neighboring nation that way. You lose some you win some but ultimately we‘ll have to see and wait how it plays out.
Look at these fleshbags smiling like dorks as they work on being replaced by machines.
I’ve heard dynamic contracts used to be wide spread in Germany but I haven‘t seen one in the wild for as long as I live. I guess it makes sense smart meter adoption is slow when there‘s no real benefit.
I forgot I even had a Windows partition…
I am convinced of that. They only feared bad press but they have no reason whatsoever to stop.
I too think we‘re long past the point of calling games that released as recent as 15 years ago retro because they simply don‘t evolve in the speed they used to.
Imagine looking back at 1993 when you’re in 2008. Yeah, that’s a huge leap in technology. But look back at 2011 now and you realize that stuff doesn‘t feel nearly as ancient.
From all I know a game needs to be at least 20 years old to be considered retro these days. That‘s the most common definition you will find these days.
Ah, so you figured out our government is made of hypocrite millionaires. Whenever they say something vague that kind of makes sense at first they usually mean the exact opposite.
Might as well write it was destroyed because the only way to sell gold this old is to melt it down.
Different countries have different type of costumers that are willing to pay different prices. The platform might also be much more popular in some countries vs. others. Amazon has figured this all out by collecting tons of data.
This is also highlights why we need to push back against dynamic pricing. Because it‘s this on steroids.
Eat a bag of dogshit.
Right now both are losing points in polls and Merz has no interest in dissolving the Government with such useful henchmen to do their bidding. He might step down but will be replaced by someone from his party. All the while left and greens gain traction against the common main stream media narrative.
Last time I checked AfD and CDU have lost a percent in polls while Greens and Linke gained 2% :P
And the country elected a leader who prides himself on wanting to destroy renewables.