I made a graphic in paint because I didn't have any crayons for you.
Feel free to replace Total Universal Resources, for "Human health" when dealing with cancer. Works as is for capitalism. as it does for life. As per the point of the OP.
Offensive vs Defensive. Think in terms of physical violence. Attacking someone else without legitimate provocation is offensive, ergo intolerant. Attacking someone who is attacking you is defensive, thus remains tolerant.
Pick any scenario and you can fit it into that construct with adequate context and nuance, there's two sides to every coin, you just need to look close enough to see which side is up.
They should still be obligated to record and pass on the details of the crime, and get the citizen in contact with the correct people directly. Recording and reporting crime and inter-police communication is kinda their whole fucken job.
Office Space, Waterworld, Super Mario Bros., all legendary movies, none did well at the box office. I've got a running theory that anything Dennis Hopper is in has a significant chance to become a cult classic.
Yeah, have you?
areweanticheatyet.com
And NFT's are the receipts.
Which they've only been doing for... checks watch...30 years.
Then do us a favour and pay up.
The point is the part you're not getting. Obviously.
Reductio ad absurdum, is the point.
Hence the point. They really need to boost universal education funding.
I made a graphic in paint because I didn't have any crayons for you.
Feel free to replace Total Universal Resources, for "Human health" when dealing with cancer. Works as is for capitalism. as it does for life. As per the point of the OP.
The only limit to life is the available resources, same with cancer, same with capitalism.
Life will continue until it ends or consumes the universe, just like cancer does with a human body, or a capitalist does to a society.
Appeasement doesn't work with an opponent incapable of concession.
Offensive vs Defensive. Think in terms of physical violence. Attacking someone else without legitimate provocation is offensive, ergo intolerant. Attacking someone who is attacking you is defensive, thus remains tolerant.
Pick any scenario and you can fit it into that construct with adequate context and nuance, there's two sides to every coin, you just need to look close enough to see which side is up.
Their problems are self inflicted, there's a difference.
Hate with your head, not with your hands,
otherwise you'll be picking from commissary plans.
They should still be obligated to record and pass on the details of the crime, and get the citizen in contact with the correct people directly. Recording and reporting crime and inter-police communication is kinda their whole fucken job.
Self defense isn't oppression.
@Rivalarrival@infosec.pub, got caught up on two simple questions and lost their composure.
Office Space, Waterworld, Super Mario Bros., all legendary movies, none did well at the box office. I've got a running theory that anything Dennis Hopper is in has a significant chance to become a cult classic.