I can just repeat myself while al of your mentioned facts are facts (although I do not know of any storage anywhere which is save for thousands of years). Of course Nuclear is infinitely better than fossils. The most important thing most people do not talk about however is price per kWh. And if you were to read up on that you would see that Nuclear is pretty bad. Just investing the money in renewables (which Nuclear also is not) gives way more value.
Very unlikely if maintained properly. The other facts are a lot more important. In addition to the most important one of WAY cheaper price per kWh (of Solar/Wind).
And one medium important thing: Nuclear plants often rely on a river for cooling. If said river gets to warm/carries to little water the plant may have to shut down (happened a lot in France recently).
How dumb. Solar and Wind are SOO much cheaper per kWh than Nuclear and fossils. With them also comes the benefit of decentralisation. With 1.6B you could install so much more Watts of power with wind turbines and solar parks with the added benefit of less carbon and less nuclear waste and less chance of boom.
This reminds me of Windows Telemetry claiming it is necessary to improve the product. Well, that worked out…
I don’t know about you but I don’t like to be watched by big brother all the time.
Nur heutzutage - nach 40 Jahren - sollten (OffenPGP) E2E verschlüsselte E-Briefe der Standard sein, was sie leider nicht sind.
Fuck axel springer_ with its monopoly on news.
☝️
Green seems weird as a trolley/streetcar/tram/transit in general color. Hmmm…
Old Thinkpad 😎
BIG BROTHER advanced to level 3.
I would also like to see prove for your claim.
And as you called “anti-nuclear people” “anti-vaxxers” I might add that those small nuclear reactors are such a tech bro bullshit.
Agree
I can just repeat myself while al of your mentioned facts are facts (although I do not know of any storage anywhere which is save for thousands of years). Of course Nuclear is infinitely better than fossils. The most important thing most people do not talk about however is price per kWh. And if you were to read up on that you would see that Nuclear is pretty bad. Just investing the money in renewables (which Nuclear also is not) gives way more value.
Very unlikely if maintained properly. The other facts are a lot more important. In addition to the most important one of WAY cheaper price per kWh (of Solar/Wind). And one medium important thing: Nuclear plants often rely on a river for cooling. If said river gets to warm/carries to little water the plant may have to shut down (happened a lot in France recently).
It is thanks. Looks quite similar to German English broadcast DW.
wtf? is this fascist bullshit post?
How dumb. Solar and Wind are SOO much cheaper per kWh than Nuclear and fossils. With them also comes the benefit of decentralisation. With 1.6B you could install so much more Watts of power with wind turbines and solar parks with the added benefit of less carbon and less nuclear waste and less chance of boom.
Redesign being I2P
Is the D Deutsche Welle? Or what is that? The other ones are clear.
fresh
If you are cross-posting please mark it as such. My poor communist in c/memes.