If the "political purge" is creating term limits so that elected officials have to rotate out... it doesnt seem much like a purge and more like a consequence of not allowing life long politicians in office.
The only purge seems like the president, and it was literally part of his campaign promises for parliament to vote on a new one if i recall correctly.
I mean, for sure power can corrupt, but this is a government that was elected by its people to go in, investigate widespread corruption and they cant do it with the people they need to investigate holding the keys.
Sounds like a paradox of tolerance situation here.
The Commission is headed by five Commissioners, nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, each serving a seven-year term. No more than three Commissioners can be of the same political party. The President chooses one Commissioner to act as Chair.
The FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection stops unfair, deceptive and fraudulent business practices by collecting reports from consumers and conducting investigations, suing companies and people that break the law, developing rules to maintain a fair marketplace, and educating consumers and businesses about their rights and responsibilities.
If you were like me and didn't know about the double slider; if you drag the comment left, the first symbol is to collapse to parent, if you keep dragging a bit further, it goes to reply. Hope that helps!
I beleive the Ukrainian government said something along the lines of "we're willing to negotiate as long as there are assurances of support should Russia resume invading" and were told they would get no auch assurance from the US....
So is your positon
a) european countries should put boots on the ground
b) a country should stop their defence with no 3rd party guarantees of protection should promises get broken
What it criticizes is "if you participate in a thing you are told you may not criticize the thing" to help people remember that sometimes you must participate in a subpar thing based on circumstances, but exercise your freedoms to criticise, contribute and seek continuous improvement in circumstances and things.
For sure, good call out, I think they just mean only 21% of people feel sure about wanting kids, and if we remove the age bias it goes to 26%. Honestly it would be more interesting to compare the categories to answers from 10, 20 or 30 years ago to have a better benchmark for how we could interperet this.
There are a number of food programs, including charities that recognize some kids starve over the summer when kids are not in school. E.g. the food banks Canada after the bell program.
foodbankscanada.ca/after-the-bell
So take the time to reflect on
1- your right to feed your kids is not impacted, these programs are for kids who have no food, but you can still provide your own meals
2- without these programs some children starve
3- is there any possible argument that supports the outcome where some kids starve.
Awesome, who was the true leftist (or whatever affiliation) thats been working on this and supporting the workers so we can support them! Missed it, or clearly the media has been biased and not promoting their great work.
If the "political purge" is creating term limits so that elected officials have to rotate out... it doesnt seem much like a purge and more like a consequence of not allowing life long politicians in office.
The only purge seems like the president, and it was literally part of his campaign promises for parliament to vote on a new one if i recall correctly.
I mean, for sure power can corrupt, but this is a government that was elected by its people to go in, investigate widespread corruption and they cant do it with the people they need to investigate holding the keys.
Sounds like a paradox of tolerance situation here.
What creatures habitat is flat mown grass? Natural or otherwise.
Do you think that retirees think theyll be around when shit hits the fan? Or are they trying to plant trees whos shade they wont enjoy?
Hey bud, FTC, not FCC. Both woulf be bad but this might be worse.
FTC website (current 20250319)
FTC website (current 20250319)
They do have a ruling. 1935. May not without cause. Specific language is inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office. So your point is...?
If you mean the slider, fair enough.
If you were like me and didn't know about the double slider; if you drag the comment left, the first symbol is to collapse to parent, if you keep dragging a bit further, it goes to reply. Hope that helps!
Don't stress, the plastic's got 'em. Thanks for taking the time to share your explanations though.
I beleive the Ukrainian government said something along the lines of "we're willing to negotiate as long as there are assurances of support should Russia resume invading" and were told they would get no auch assurance from the US....
So is your positon
a) european countries should put boots on the ground
b) a country should stop their defence with no 3rd party guarantees of protection should promises get broken
c) something else?
Land of the free, patriots of the eagle, when my side does anything, it's totally leagle
Said Canada to the US...
What it criticizes is "if you participate in a thing you are told you may not criticize the thing" to help people remember that sometimes you must participate in a subpar thing based on circumstances, but exercise your freedoms to criticise, contribute and seek continuous improvement in circumstances and things.
Did it mean something else to you at first read?
Wonder if they will ask certain athletes to remove necklaces etc.
https://www.yardbarker.com/tennis/articles/unapologetic_novak_djokovic_proudly_flaunts_his_serbian_orthodox_cross_once_again_after_frances_blasphemous_opening_ceremony_antics/s1_17325_40674459
Is no one going to mention the arm growing out of someones ear? 😁
Schools in America are.. Checks notes.. communist?
For sure, good call out, I think they just mean only 21% of people feel sure about wanting kids, and if we remove the age bias it goes to 26%. Honestly it would be more interesting to compare the categories to answers from 10, 20 or 30 years ago to have a better benchmark for how we could interperet this.
Thanks for this, so I redid the math using the two youngest categories (up to 34 years old) and the % goes from 21% to 26% 🤷♂️
My focus is on far more than kids, youre the one saying they dont need any help.
And I'm posting so others dont fall for your BS. Always have been.
Read my response again, try both links.
Where you live doesnt represent the whole country and vice versa
Many schools run their own programs, PTAs do as well.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/national-food-program-schools-explain-1.7160901
Has background on what exists already in addition to forward looking proposals
I agree that food banks are different than programs, again, read response in full
And finally, nice dodge. Should we (society) feed hungry kids yes/no.
Well thats an easily disprovable
lieerr... lets be generous, error through ignorance.Canada food programs
There are a number of food programs, including charities that recognize some kids starve over the summer when kids are not in school. E.g. the food banks Canada after the bell program.
foodbankscanada.ca/after-the-bell
So take the time to reflect on 1- your right to feed your kids is not impacted, these programs are for kids who have no food, but you can still provide your own meals
2- without these programs some children starve
3- is there any possible argument that supports the outcome where some kids starve.
Awesome, who was the true leftist (or whatever affiliation) thats been working on this and supporting the workers so we can support them! Missed it, or clearly the media has been biased and not promoting their great work.