Habe zu wenig Vorwissen in Mathematik, ich habe es aber so verstanden, dass jede Projektion einen "Fehler" hat. Die Frage ist am Ende nur, welchen man wählt. Danke für die Erweiterung "für alle Teile der Kugel", das macht sehr viel Sinn.
Ganz "flächentreu" bekommt man keine Projektion hin, steckt ja quasi im Namen. Abei bei der Equal Earth Projection bleiben die Proportionen der einzelnen Landmassen erhalten, somit kann man zumindest den Vergleich von Länder/Kontinente anstellen.
Thank you for this comment! I guess we will only have sufficient backlash, when they come for all the ones that are quiet now. But by then we will already have lost the queer, the jews, the refugees ind so many others.
Cooles Konzept, kann die Preisverleihung empfehlen, die Aufzeichnung müsste man unter der IG-Nobelpreis Homepage finden können. Ein schönes Fest auf die Wissenschaft und zeigt, dass sich nicht alle zu sehr Ernst nehmen
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler
Die Bananen sind Rektoren von Universitäten
:::
I have you tagged as "researches before blindly commenting", thank you for staying true to that and the information.
I think the anti-AI protest should not focus so much on one issue, the water consumption was something that often filled my feed. This comparison to beef is kinda weird and ill-intended, as it takes the worst part (the biggest number) of one and compares it to datacenters saying "see, it does not matter, there are worse things". In my opinion the discussion should be more about "do we even want datacenters including all the risks and problems coming with them". And as you nicely put, there are more disadvantages with that and we should be careful.
It is. The differece is that Silverbullet is self-hosted and not in app like Obsidian. The basics are the same, Obsidian has a way bigger community and more plugins, Silverbullet is easier to extend due to using Lua. Lastly, Silverbullet has queries built in, in Obsidian you have to use Dataview.
If you need a markdown-based note storing system Silverbullet is great. Obsidian has more bling and customizability, but is not self-hostable.
Love me some Will Crichton. Great talk and although this is a summary of his work and not a new tool, it is great to have it all in one place and concisely explained.
The group I did my PhD in used eLabFTW after I was gone. I heard only positive things and am trying to implement it in my current job (can not really selfhost as the IT department does all services).
It should have a system to log experiments as well as have basic (maybe even more) inventory management. As far as I remember it dous not need any "big" hardware, so just using an older computer with a good backup strategy should work fine.
Falls du wirklich Bahnfahren willst, hier ein paar Tipps, die es erschwinglich(er) machen können:
sehr früh buchen (2-3 Monate vorher)
Randzeiten buchen (sehr früh oder sehr spät, nicht Freitag/Sonntag)
BahnCard 25 lohnt sich recht schnell, reduziert auch Sparpreise um 25%
Ich fahr regelmäßig für 25€/Fahrt mit dem ICE durch Deuchschland, gibt aber auch immer wieder teurere Fahrten.
Am Ende ist es immer eine Abwägung aus Komfort, Kosten, Planung/Vorlauf und Individualität (im Zug hast du keinen Einfluss auf die Fahrt).
Our professor in quantum chemistry always told the story, that no one believed in it in the beginning and wanted to disprove it. This lead to one of the best tested hypotheses in the field that it is today.
By definition, anonymized data can not be reversed. However, many people do not know that difference. If the data would really be anonymized, it would be fine from a data protection point of view.
Legitimate interest is a way for the vendors to not need your confirmation. In general, your right to privacy is valued against the vendor's right to operate. The most often used example is advertisement: in general, vendors are allowed to advertise, as they want to operate and sell their products. But you have a right to your data (e.g. mail adress, home adress, interests...). So courts have to value what is more important. Another example that most people would agree is that clubs want to show what happens in the club, so they publish pictures from their activities (interest of club to show they are active vs personal right to your image).
As not every case goes to court, most vendors see their interest as more important and interpret "legitimate" interest rather loosely. So in general, the idea of legitimate interest is compliant with the GDPR, although I believe most sites use it too liberal.
A notable exception would be Robert Jordan and his Wheel of Time series. He prepared notes so someone could finish the work and his widow picked Brandon Sanderson to finish the series. But I think it feels easier to milk it than to be thoughtful with the life's work of someone, as this requires a lot "would he have liked it" and to know this you would have to start caring early.
There is a fine and impossible to hit line that businesses have their own interest of surviving and should be able to use data. Like making better suggestions or tracking whether certain changes in their homepage work. This is not required for functioning but vital to companies for succeeding and giving you a better product. However, this should only be done on one site at a time, cross-site tracking oe fingerprinting is what sucks and allows data brokers to exist in the first place.
No lawyer can hammer into law, what a site needs to function, as it differs by site and is flexible in what people think is necessary. But your examples are good in that they show how sites go way too far to justify their over-the-top tracking. Maybe there really is an easy way to write it in "legalese", but I don't see it yet. But I am fully on your site, the current behaviour and practices are bad and unclear for customers.
That is actually really close to what is present now. The EU never said "use cookie banners" but rather "if you really want to track people, they have to say yes". And most commercial websites decided to make it hard to say no, now everyone blames the EU for doing so.
Your second point is not yet implemented, this would be really good for consumers.
Habe zu wenig Vorwissen in Mathematik, ich habe es aber so verstanden, dass jede Projektion einen "Fehler" hat. Die Frage ist am Ende nur, welchen man wählt. Danke für die Erweiterung "für alle Teile der Kugel", das macht sehr viel Sinn.
Ganz "flächentreu" bekommt man keine Projektion hin, steckt ja quasi im Namen. Abei bei der Equal Earth Projection bleiben die Proportionen der einzelnen Landmassen erhalten, somit kann man zumindest den Vergleich von Länder/Kontinente anstellen.
Thank you for this comment! I guess we will only have sufficient backlash, when they come for all the ones that are quiet now. But by then we will already have lost the queer, the jews, the refugees ind so many others.
Cooles Konzept, kann die Preisverleihung empfehlen, die Aufzeichnung müsste man unter der IG-Nobelpreis Homepage finden können. Ein schönes Fest auf die Wissenschaft und zeigt, dass sich nicht alle zu sehr Ernst nehmen
::: spoiler Tap for spoiler Die Bananen sind Rektoren von Universitäten :::
I have you tagged as "researches before blindly commenting", thank you for staying true to that and the information.
I think the anti-AI protest should not focus so much on one issue, the water consumption was something that often filled my feed. This comparison to beef is kinda weird and ill-intended, as it takes the worst part (the biggest number) of one and compares it to datacenters saying "see, it does not matter, there are worse things". In my opinion the discussion should be more about "do we even want datacenters including all the risks and problems coming with them". And as you nicely put, there are more disadvantages with that and we should be careful.
They managed to write so many quips in the show that portrays the characters well. The exchange between Mal and Jayne at the end as well.
"Why didn't you take the offer?"
"The moneg was not good enough."
"What will happen if it is someday?"
"We will see, this will be a very interesting day."
in like 4 lines you get to know their working relationship and also get a glimpse of how much Mal knows and deduces.
Yeah it is a great setup for the rest of the show and it really introduces the characters well. Still don't get why this was not aired first
"How is business?" - "None of yours" Why does the dialogue work so well between the characters?
It is. The differece is that Silverbullet is self-hosted and not in app like Obsidian. The basics are the same, Obsidian has a way bigger community and more plugins, Silverbullet is easier to extend due to using Lua. Lastly, Silverbullet has queries built in, in Obsidian you have to use Dataview. If you need a markdown-based note storing system Silverbullet is great. Obsidian has more bling and customizability, but is not self-hostable.
Love me some Will Crichton. Great talk and although this is a summary of his work and not a new tool, it is great to have it all in one place and concisely explained.
The group I did my PhD in used eLabFTW after I was gone. I heard only positive things and am trying to implement it in my current job (can not really selfhost as the IT department does all services). It should have a system to log experiments as well as have basic (maybe even more) inventory management. As far as I remember it dous not need any "big" hardware, so just using an older computer with a good backup strategy should work fine.
They are responsible for getting both "data protection adequacy agreements" for the US thrown out in court (see Max Schrems).
Falls du wirklich Bahnfahren willst, hier ein paar Tipps, die es erschwinglich(er) machen können:
Ich fahr regelmäßig für 25€/Fahrt mit dem ICE durch Deuchschland, gibt aber auch immer wieder teurere Fahrten. Am Ende ist es immer eine Abwägung aus Komfort, Kosten, Planung/Vorlauf und Individualität (im Zug hast du keinen Einfluss auf die Fahrt).
Our professor in quantum chemistry always told the story, that no one believed in it in the beginning and wanted to disprove it. This lead to one of the best tested hypotheses in the field that it is today.
By definition, anonymized data can not be reversed. However, many people do not know that difference. If the data would really be anonymized, it would be fine from a data protection point of view.
Legitimate interest is a way for the vendors to not need your confirmation. In general, your right to privacy is valued against the vendor's right to operate. The most often used example is advertisement: in general, vendors are allowed to advertise, as they want to operate and sell their products. But you have a right to your data (e.g. mail adress, home adress, interests...). So courts have to value what is more important. Another example that most people would agree is that clubs want to show what happens in the club, so they publish pictures from their activities (interest of club to show they are active vs personal right to your image). As not every case goes to court, most vendors see their interest as more important and interpret "legitimate" interest rather loosely. So in general, the idea of legitimate interest is compliant with the GDPR, although I believe most sites use it too liberal.
A notable exception would be Robert Jordan and his Wheel of Time series. He prepared notes so someone could finish the work and his widow picked Brandon Sanderson to finish the series. But I think it feels easier to milk it than to be thoughtful with the life's work of someone, as this requires a lot "would he have liked it" and to know this you would have to start caring early.
There is a fine and impossible to hit line that businesses have their own interest of surviving and should be able to use data. Like making better suggestions or tracking whether certain changes in their homepage work. This is not required for functioning but vital to companies for succeeding and giving you a better product. However, this should only be done on one site at a time, cross-site tracking oe fingerprinting is what sucks and allows data brokers to exist in the first place.
No lawyer can hammer into law, what a site needs to function, as it differs by site and is flexible in what people think is necessary. But your examples are good in that they show how sites go way too far to justify their over-the-top tracking. Maybe there really is an easy way to write it in "legalese", but I don't see it yet. But I am fully on your site, the current behaviour and practices are bad and unclear for customers.
That is actually really close to what is present now. The EU never said "use cookie banners" but rather "if you really want to track people, they have to say yes". And most commercial websites decided to make it hard to say no, now everyone blames the EU for doing so. Your second point is not yet implemented, this would be really good for consumers.