I've used Arch on many different computers over the years. It's not stable, it breaks. I don't understand why it's great. Debian (minimal install) is better.
DRIVERLESS CARS: We killed them. We killed them all. They're dead, every single one of them. And not just the pedestmen, but the pedestwomen and the pedestchildren, too. We slaughtered them like animals. We hate them!
You write a description for your application in a language you are not confident in. You are aware you could have made errors, yet you don't take the time to check it with a grammar checker. It's a simple process and takes seconds.
I'd like to point out again that language mistakes have been made in a language-related application. Constructive criticism is fine. The developer will learn from his mistakes.
At least it's a marketing mistake. People who use poor grammar are not typically taken seriously.
"I find it more compelling to read such a description in obviously non-native English..."
It's something to do with donuts.
I've used Arch on many different computers over the years. It's not stable, it breaks. I don't understand why it's great. Debian (minimal install) is better.
TempleOS: I'm not crazy, I'm not crazy. I'm not...
Trisquel GNU/Linux: I'd just like to interject for a moment...
Ubuntu Satanic Edition: đź‘€
DRIVERLESS CARS: We killed them. We killed them all. They're dead, every single one of them. And not just the pedestmen, but the pedestwomen and the pedestchildren, too. We slaughtered them like animals. We hate them!
The show?
I would like to invite you to learn about some child development and basic psychology.
That's very recent, I didn't know.
I wouldn't use a browser bought by a shady company when there are good alternatives. I wouldn't want to support that company by using it.
Waterfox has been bought by advertising and data analytics firm System1.
I ditched Linux Mint for TempleOS. The holiest decision I've ever made.
I make shapes in cornfields, but humans get pretty scared.
Not if they can't catch you!
At least it didn't alienate her.
Did Shakespeare really say this? Are we sure?
You write a description for your application in a language you are not confident in. You are aware you could have made errors, yet you don't take the time to check it with a grammar checker. It's a simple process and takes seconds.
I'd like to point out again that language mistakes have been made in a language-related application. Constructive criticism is fine. The developer will learn from his mistakes.
At least it's a marketing mistake. People who use poor grammar are not typically taken seriously.
Not everyone agrees, that's subjective.