on Look at me, · c/politicalmemes · -3 pts · 2yAll the more reason to give them better paying jobs and enable them to build strong institutions.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · -9 pts · 2yMy entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · -9 pts · 2yI work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too. I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · -5 pts · 2yYes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
on One in 100 people in Gaza has been killed since October 7 · c/world · -6 pts · 2yPeople break laws all the time. That doesnt mean the gov supports them. You may enjoy learning about the actual nuance here https://israelpolicyforum.org/west-bank-settlements-explained/
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · -2 pts · 2yThat's certainly an opinion you have
on Trump’s alleged ‘sexual proclivities’ graphically detailed in new Epstein documents · c/news · 6 pts · 2yI don't care if he likes to be peed on or whatever, but seriously try to imagine saying this to someone she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples’,” she testified.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · 2 pts · 2y the people stealing data No one is doing this Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work Cool, discussion over.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · 0 pts · 2yI agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this. Output is what should be moderated by law.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · 10 pts · 2yIf it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.
on One in 100 people in Gaza has been killed since October 7 · c/world · -11 pts · 2y Yet Israeli settlers are free to harass Palestinians and force them from their homes without consequence That's simply not true https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-08/ty-article/.premium/second-west-bank-settler-suspected-of-attacking-palestinians-to-be-held-without-trial/0000018c-49af-d6bd-a1ad-7bff81930000 Meanwhile Hamas literally has in their original charter that the reason they exist was to form an Islamic state, resist PA secularism, and fight a two state solution, because their goal was genocide of Israel.
on Look at me, · c/politicalmemes · 1 pts · 2yNone of this has anything to do with outsourcing labor other than that you'll have way more dollars than if you were a subsistence farmer.
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · 0 pts · 2y at their expense How?
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · -1 pts · 2yWhy do you have free reign to do the same? AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes. I think you're going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them
on ‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says · c/technology · 15 pts · 2yThere's a third solution you're overlooking. 3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
on One in 100 people in Gaza has been killed since October 7 · c/world · -18 pts · 2yHamas only exists because peaceful diplomacy with Israel was successful, and leading to a secular Palestinian state and a two state solution.
on One in 100 people in Gaza has been killed since October 7 · c/world · -28 pts · 2yAs this wasn't a terrorist attack, a closer analogue is a recent war. One estimate puts civilian casualties in the Battle of Mosul at around 40,000 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/why-the-human-toll-of-the-battle-for-mosul-may-never-be-known
on Look at me, · c/politicalmemes · 0 pts · 2yI'm not exploiting you if we agree on a price for something.
on Look at me, · c/politicalmemes · 2 pts · 2y we demand money and offer that the only way they can make it is by exploitation. This is the opposite of outsourcing labor.
All the more reason to give them better paying jobs and enable them to build strong institutions.
My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.
I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I'm not concerned with what you think is "objective truth" when you have no idea what you're talking about.
Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don't understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
People break laws all the time. That doesnt mean the gov supports them.
You may enjoy learning about the actual nuance here
https://israelpolicyforum.org/west-bank-settlements-explained/
That's certainly an opinion you have
I don't care if he likes to be peed on or whatever, but seriously try to imagine saying this to someone
No one is doing this
Cool, discussion over.
I agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this.
Output is what should be moderated by law.
If it's not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don't need permission to read books.
That's simply not true
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-12-08/ty-article/.premium/second-west-bank-settler-suspected-of-attacking-palestinians-to-be-held-without-trial/0000018c-49af-d6bd-a1ad-7bff81930000
Meanwhile Hamas literally has in their original charter that the reason they exist was to form an Islamic state, resist PA secularism, and fight a two state solution, because their goal was genocide of Israel.
None of this has anything to do with outsourcing labor other than that you'll have way more dollars than if you were a subsistence farmer.
How?
Why do you have free reign to do the same?
I think you're going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them
There's a third solution you're overlooking.
3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
Hamas only exists because peaceful diplomacy with Israel was successful, and leading to a secular Palestinian state and a two state solution.
As this wasn't a terrorist attack, a closer analogue is a recent war.
One estimate puts civilian casualties in the Battle of Mosul at around 40,000
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/why-the-human-toll-of-the-battle-for-mosul-may-never-be-known
I'm not exploiting you if we agree on a price for something.
This is the opposite of outsourcing labor.