Sarah Valentine

u/SarahValentine@pawb.social
0 posts · 325 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

on Scrapist [PizzaCake] · c/comicstrips · -4 pts · 1d

So he’s a bad guy because he wrote a joke you didn’t like?

Oh for fuck's sake. Is that the best you can do? Get outta here with this nonsense.

God forbid you take off the kid gloves when the world is being overrun by right wing fascists and super-rich techbros who all want us all trapped in a goddamn Torment Nexus, and people are whining about how much less money a band would make if they didn't advertise in the Reichstag.

It’s not that I care what people on that platform think. It’s that I care what shows up in search engines and whether my brand is diluted by people other than me.

So get an actually original brand name and sue people who fuck with you.

Headlines don’t get unprinted. If Muse quit Facebook or Instagram, especially after already having a presence there, it would be trivial for someone to swipe their brand identity and start posting horrible shit to generate headlines.

And it would be equally trivial for anyone to communicate to the world that they do not use facebook or insta, and that if anyone shows up there under the brand name they're a fake. It's not a parking lot. They're not in your space. If they impersonate you that's, again, something you could take them to court over. At no point are you required to support a pro-fascist platform by showing up to make sure nobody pretends to be you in a place nobody who cares about you should ever go. Holy shit, how is this hard to grasp.

I squat my name on Twitter because I don’t want it taken. I don’t use the platform except to log in periodically to keep it active.

Sounds reasonable if you give a shit about what people who still use Xitter think. Doesn't sound anything like what Muse and artists like them do though.

Does that make me greedy?

No, but what you describe doesn't generalize to the real situation we're talking about here.

The "nothing" was the evidence in favor of aether or spontaneous generation. They were disproved simply by demonstrating that the phenomena attributed to those processes had causes which better fit the observed reality. You have not provided a single phenomena for which God would be a more plausible cause than natural processes.

Asking for evidence against the existence of something is beginning with the assumption that thing exists to be disproven. That's why everyone is asking what evidence there is FOR the existence of God. There isn't any proof, so there's no reason to assume a God exists, and thus there is nothing to dis-prove.