Citizenship is extremely hard to obtain - basically impossible, a few western comrades have achieved it but their contribution to the PRC was extraordinary.
Without a university degree it's not possible to obtain a work visa.
If you want to move to move to China you're going to have to improve yourself so that you won't be a burden upon their society first. Complete a university degree in a useful field first.
This may not be what you were hoping to hear but this is the reality of the situation.
There are programmes that can help you obtain a GED at minimal cost. Once you've finished your high school equivalent qualification, you can get government grants or loans to obtain higher education. Most debts are unlikely to follow you if you move far away.
The days of China accepting people just for being white westerners are over. Please consider continuing with your education even if you are worried about being "too old"
The poor little orcs have no say over their government, unlike the great cracker nations where we proudly support our genocidal wars of aggression based on lies. No racism here, we voted for a black man one time.
Oh thanks, I needed a name around the time the BBC published a story on the Russians shelling Tarkov, though most probably think it's a reference to the game.
He said there's no ethical or moral argument why cp shouldn't be legal, many times. He has said that no ethical consumption under capitalism means that such unethical content should be permitted. Why are you trying to defend him? It's not one thing "taken out of context" as vaushites attempt to claim, he has made very sus arguments many times and even admitted to "jerking it" to underage hentai imagery.
Under capitalist logic maybe they make sense in natural monopoly situations -water, electricity, telecoms, trains. But nationalization makes more sense in such "markets" rather than attempting to create artificial market "competiton".
Richard Wolff's partner, Harriet Fraad is a psychiatrist and has similar ideas and made a podcast with a therapist, Max Golding, called It's Not Just in Your Head. Libertarian psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote extensively on the limitations of his field.
Historically psychiatry has been used to control runaway slaves, suffering drapetomia. Complaining women had hysteria. You are gay? That was diagnosable.
Racial bias in psych treatment is well documented, with people of color more likely to be perceived as aggressive and a threat to others than white presenting people with similar behaviour.
Psychiatry is most often practiced on an individual and fails to take into account the societal problems around an individual. If you're boss abuses you or the system as a whole alienates you there is little a psych can do.
I used to consider myself antipsychiatry, I have personally had negative experiences with involuntary psychiatric "treatment"
While going through an anarchist phase there was seemingly little contradiction between my antipsych and ideological beliefs - it's just another unjust hierarchy. You can only be diagnosed if your function within this capitalist system is impaired.
As I embraced Marxist-Leninist ideas, contradictions became evident. Liberalism is an infantile disorder, the psychopathic accumulation of wealth by the richest endangers our survival as a species, the insecurities of those who hold on to the patriarchy and supremacist ideas should be remedied, one way or another.
I defended the right of self identifying neurodiverse people to reclaim labels such as autism while maintaining their criticism of psychiatry as it was inflicted upon themselves - within antipsychiatry communities such sentiment was not welcome. I was subjected to antisemitic attacks for refusing to endorse the labelling of psychiatry as a "holocaust"
I have much sympathy for the people who call themselves antipsychiatry, most of them have suffered immensely and they have legitimate criticisms of the field. But I can't call them comrades, for most - their understanding of the systems of oppression is too narrow - their hatred of psychiatry is bordering on reactionary. Seeing well meaning people with legitimate criticism of psychiatry, who were rejected by such communities for daring to identify as autistic or ND was quite disappointing. Seeing entirely antimedical communities come into being from antipsychiatry ones, even worse.
I still have serious doubts about the long term efficacy of psychiatric treatment but I'm willing to accept that there maybe some situations where it is appropriate. I am an administrator on a discord server that describes itself as psych abolitionist and is mostly populated by anarchists that I helped start while I still considered myself antipsych that at least doesn't allow for bigotry or hate speech, though I am not very comfortable with my role there and would prefer to just be a visitor - I don't enforce my ideology there and try not to be heavy handed with the rules, I've asked to have my admin/mod powers removed but my anarchist friend, who created the server, lives in a different timezone, isn't very active online and seems to have faith in my ability to be fair.
Citizenship is extremely hard to obtain - basically impossible, a few western comrades have achieved it but their contribution to the PRC was extraordinary.
Without a university degree it's not possible to obtain a work visa.
If you want to move to move to China you're going to have to improve yourself so that you won't be a burden upon their society first. Complete a university degree in a useful field first.
This may not be what you were hoping to hear but this is the reality of the situation.
There are programmes that can help you obtain a GED at minimal cost. Once you've finished your high school equivalent qualification, you can get government grants or loans to obtain higher education. Most debts are unlikely to follow you if you move far away.
The days of China accepting people just for being white westerners are over. Please consider continuing with your education even if you are worried about being "too old"
Maybe she shouldn't have defended/slept with that collaborationist fascist cop but yeah no comparison with the crimes of Dukat
Always has been comrade
The poor little orcs have no say over their government, unlike the great cracker nations where we proudly support our genocidal wars of aggression based on lies. No racism here, we voted for a black man one time.
As a proud settler I only believe in crackernomics
Oh she showed up, once they won the vote and there was little risk in associating with the unionisation drive.
Fidel nationalized his family's farms
Oh thanks, I needed a name around the time the BBC published a story on the Russians shelling Tarkov, though most probably think it's a reference to the game.
The status quo can be seen as "being a separate entity" but it could also be seen as "ever deepening economic integration with the mainland"
Mission accomplished.
Even in the earliest days of European colonialism, there was very much a concept of the damage being done, look up Bartolomé de las Casas and educate yourself.
Can you spill the tea? Iirc GI made some fairly based videos that were removed after radlibs/pseudolefties called you guys tankies.
We don't want to "make amerika great" we want to abolish and decolonize it.
"Ronald Reagan was a freedom fighter in terms of supporting our Jewish bros & sis in the Soviet Union & opposing vicious forms of communism" - West
He said there's no ethical or moral argument why cp shouldn't be legal, many times. He has said that no ethical consumption under capitalism means that such unethical content should be permitted. Why are you trying to defend him? It's not one thing "taken out of context" as vaushites attempt to claim, he has made very sus arguments many times and even admitted to "jerking it" to underage hentai imagery.
https://youtu.be/IoB9sg5PlzE
Under capitalist logic maybe they make sense in natural monopoly situations -water, electricity, telecoms, trains. But nationalization makes more sense in such "markets" rather than attempting to create artificial market "competiton".
At least destiny isn't claiming to be a comrade or trying to normalize child r***
Young Terfs
Relevant video by Dr Jamies Davies on the DSM being written by consensus and not evidence https://youtu.be/6JPgpasgueQ
Richard Wolff's partner, Harriet Fraad is a psychiatrist and has similar ideas and made a podcast with a therapist, Max Golding, called It's Not Just in Your Head. Libertarian psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote extensively on the limitations of his field.
Historically psychiatry has been used to control runaway slaves, suffering drapetomia. Complaining women had hysteria. You are gay? That was diagnosable.
Racial bias in psych treatment is well documented, with people of color more likely to be perceived as aggressive and a threat to others than white presenting people with similar behaviour.
Psychiatry is most often practiced on an individual and fails to take into account the societal problems around an individual. If you're boss abuses you or the system as a whole alienates you there is little a psych can do.
I used to consider myself antipsychiatry, I have personally had negative experiences with involuntary psychiatric "treatment"
While going through an anarchist phase there was seemingly little contradiction between my antipsych and ideological beliefs - it's just another unjust hierarchy. You can only be diagnosed if your function within this capitalist system is impaired.
As I embraced Marxist-Leninist ideas, contradictions became evident. Liberalism is an infantile disorder, the psychopathic accumulation of wealth by the richest endangers our survival as a species, the insecurities of those who hold on to the patriarchy and supremacist ideas should be remedied, one way or another.
I defended the right of self identifying neurodiverse people to reclaim labels such as autism while maintaining their criticism of psychiatry as it was inflicted upon themselves - within antipsychiatry communities such sentiment was not welcome. I was subjected to antisemitic attacks for refusing to endorse the labelling of psychiatry as a "holocaust"
I have much sympathy for the people who call themselves antipsychiatry, most of them have suffered immensely and they have legitimate criticisms of the field. But I can't call them comrades, for most - their understanding of the systems of oppression is too narrow - their hatred of psychiatry is bordering on reactionary. Seeing well meaning people with legitimate criticism of psychiatry, who were rejected by such communities for daring to identify as autistic or ND was quite disappointing. Seeing entirely antimedical communities come into being from antipsychiatry ones, even worse.
I still have serious doubts about the long term efficacy of psychiatric treatment but I'm willing to accept that there maybe some situations where it is appropriate. I am an administrator on a discord server that describes itself as psych abolitionist and is mostly populated by anarchists that I helped start while I still considered myself antipsych that at least doesn't allow for bigotry or hate speech, though I am not very comfortable with my role there and would prefer to just be a visitor - I don't enforce my ideology there and try not to be heavy handed with the rules, I've asked to have my admin/mod powers removed but my anarchist friend, who created the server, lives in a different timezone, isn't very active online and seems to have faith in my ability to be fair.