This. Much of human history has been reliant on renewable energy (firewood, food, heating, etc), and it is only the past 200 years or so that fossilized biomass has been a thing. Exotic materials can also be avoided with techniques such as concentrated solar power for high temperature manufacturing (see Odeillo solar furnace), manufacturing at sites of energy generation (eg wind mills for "milling"), and Stirling engines.
I've been seeing a lot of research on reversible fuel cells, hydrogen safety, and using hydrogen as storage for renewable surpluses. I'm curious to know what sources lead you to believe that hydrogen is "a dead end".
This article talks about additional things such as importing data, pros and cons of Firefox, and other alternatives. I know many people who are not tech savvy enough to even know how to change a browser.
However, considering that this is posted on Lemmy where most users are already tech savvy (enough to at least start using Lemmy) and more privacy and open source focused (enough to at least stop using reddit), I do agree that this does feel a bit redundant for me at least.
This is an argument from ignorance
I'm curious as to where you live (city, suburb, etc) and what the age group of the people are
This is a loaded question / fallacy of presupposition
Love the drops-fill-buckets mindset!
Piggy backing on your comment: for folks wanting to put their money to more ethical use, here are some resources:
These are mostly US and climate focused resources since that's where I am. Would love to see other people's resources too!
Having just 3.5% of the population protest nonviolently would be enough. Speaking of which, the next No Kings is on March 28th!
You might be interested in "silvopasture"
This. Much of human history has been reliant on renewable energy (firewood, food, heating, etc), and it is only the past 200 years or so that fossilized biomass has been a thing. Exotic materials can also be avoided with techniques such as concentrated solar power for high temperature manufacturing (see Odeillo solar furnace), manufacturing at sites of energy generation (eg wind mills for "milling"), and Stirling engines.
I've been seeing a lot of research on reversible fuel cells, hydrogen safety, and using hydrogen as storage for renewable surpluses. I'm curious to know what sources lead you to believe that hydrogen is "a dead end".
Unfortunately it's 8 billion right now.
This article talks about additional things such as importing data, pros and cons of Firefox, and other alternatives. I know many people who are not tech savvy enough to even know how to change a browser.
However, considering that this is posted on Lemmy where most users are already tech savvy (enough to at least start using Lemmy) and more privacy and open source focused (enough to at least stop using reddit), I do agree that this does feel a bit redundant for me at least.
Toaster kill count: 700/year according to this, and 1000/year according to this.
E-Bike kill count: 119 between 2017 and 2021 according to this.