Depends on the location. Some places the lights turn to walk at regular intervals no matter what, the button only activates the beeping. But in my city the crosswalks never say walk unless someone pressed the button first.
Same thing with elevators. The door close button only works in a fraction of elevators.
Similar to the first blog post, it focuses heavily on feelings and barely mentions specific accusations. Closest thing it comes to is this:
Among other things, her supervisor asked her inappropriate questions about her sexual identity and inquired about her medical history.
An initial internal investigation ultimately determined that her supervisor’s actions were “inappropriate” and a violation of the organization’s policy, Mae said, but it was unclear what actions were taken against him.
That's it. "Inappropriate questions." No examples of questions, or the setting involved when those questions were asked. Leaves me to use my imagination to guess if the situation was truly inappropriate or not, and how bad. Reminds me of a bad review where they say something like "The waiter was so incredibly rude. Ruined our day." where the the lack of detail makes it a pretty useless review.
The actual lawsuit text would contain more info. I suppose I could look that up. But those are the details I'm looking for and I'm not seeing it in this article.
Unfortunately unless I want to pay for the court filings, all I can see is the original complaint. They went to mediation in January and settled in March. Beyond that I can't say much.
Can you lay out any and all evidence in a relatively short post? It's giant walls of text with no outside links, and seems to lack specific accusations that I can understand. I honestly have no idea what the complaint is, and I tried to read it.
Some subs went dark and never came back. Some went dark, came back only because Reddit appointed new mods and removed the old ones. There was a big shift in the top 25 or so most popular subs around that time. Total number of upvotes on the top posts also started trending downward around that time, not that I have any evidence that is a result of lowered traffic.
Your page seems like a hit piece without any evidence. Maybe try to write a coherent 300-500 word version of this and send it to a newspaper's opinion section? It's genuinely hard to understand what your complaint is, only that you hate Wikipedia.
This is the low-risk strategy that decides everything now. It's why Disney has been putting out nothing but remakes for 10+ years. They can simply put out a poll, ask people if they'd watch a sequel/buy a remaster of a game, and set the budget accordingly. Guaranteed profit. No one is cheering this on.
Can't help but feel this was changed to allow them to hire a specific person.
Appreciate the post. Glad I skipped that show.
The Beatles. It's a plural of people who can keep a beat.
Depends on the location. Some places the lights turn to walk at regular intervals no matter what, the button only activates the beeping. But in my city the crosswalks never say walk unless someone pressed the button first.
Same thing with elevators. The door close button only works in a fraction of elevators.
Similar to the first blog post, it focuses heavily on feelings and barely mentions specific accusations. Closest thing it comes to is this:
That's it. "Inappropriate questions." No examples of questions, or the setting involved when those questions were asked. Leaves me to use my imagination to guess if the situation was truly inappropriate or not, and how bad. Reminds me of a bad review where they say something like "The waiter was so incredibly rude. Ruined our day." where the the lack of detail makes it a pretty useless review.
The actual lawsuit text would contain more info. I suppose I could look that up. But those are the details I'm looking for and I'm not seeing it in this article.
Small update:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/57775875/Mae_v_Wikimedia_Foundation,_Inc
Unfortunately unless I want to pay for the court filings, all I can see is the original complaint. They went to mediation in January and settled in March. Beyond that I can't say much.
Can you lay out any and all evidence in a relatively short post? It's giant walls of text with no outside links, and seems to lack specific accusations that I can understand. I honestly have no idea what the complaint is, and I tried to read it.
Some subs went dark and never came back. Some went dark, came back only because Reddit appointed new mods and removed the old ones. There was a big shift in the top 25 or so most popular subs around that time. Total number of upvotes on the top posts also started trending downward around that time, not that I have any evidence that is a result of lowered traffic.
Your page seems like a hit piece without any evidence. Maybe try to write a coherent 300-500 word version of this and send it to a newspaper's opinion section? It's genuinely hard to understand what your complaint is, only that you hate Wikipedia.
Maybe they should charge a blanket 24% service fee on every ticket sold?
This is the low-risk strategy that decides everything now. It's why Disney has been putting out nothing but remakes for 10+ years. They can simply put out a poll, ask people if they'd watch a sequel/buy a remaster of a game, and set the budget accordingly. Guaranteed profit. No one is cheering this on.