You can literally buy Remington and Federal Target load 25-packs for $7. They are cheaper now than 2004 when adjusted for inflation. Also with more competition and more accessible reloading.
The ranges near me only charge $10 for 25 clays.
Not sure where Harper shoots or what they shoot, but shooting is cheaper now than 20 years ago and I don’t live in a low cost market.
Lowkey tho, why would you hire an Iron Works company to develop a game and not expect hiccups when the game goes live? Even experienced developers hit snags at release. Maybe they will send the presale customers some custom stair railings.
Yeah, there can be pedestrians and bikes where I live. With these new e-scooters and ebikes, they can appear pretty fast snd silently, and aren’t always in full control of their ride when going fast and don’t always obey the traffic rules. I don’t want to confuse them.
I don’t disagree with that but the article is talking about what arguments are permissible in a court room which is a little different. Same as using tools to commit a crime. It’s not illegal to own or use tools but when used in commission of a crime, this can be a factor in proving elements of a crime that require proof of intention or malice.
It’s definitely not integral. You could just control the connection points. Ie, all your software tools on intranet and wired connection only. Any data can be decrypted.
I think it’s contextual. It is definitely relevant to bring into a criminal case that criminals made attempts to obstruct gathering of evidence in commission of the crime. It’s no different than shredding or burning paper files. Evidence of criminals taking steps to hide the criminal activity is how you prove that a transgression is willful rather than negligent. That matters in cases like murder.
Encryption is also criminal in some contexts, like encrypted radio broadcasts on frequencies for public use.
It definitely belongs as a talking point in a courtroom, imo.
You can literally buy Remington and Federal Target load 25-packs for $7. They are cheaper now than 2004 when adjusted for inflation. Also with more competition and more accessible reloading.
The ranges near me only charge $10 for 25 clays.
Not sure where Harper shoots or what they shoot, but shooting is cheaper now than 20 years ago and I don’t live in a low cost market.
Lowkey tho, why would you hire an Iron Works company to develop a game and not expect hiccups when the game goes live? Even experienced developers hit snags at release. Maybe they will send the presale customers some custom stair railings.
Yeah, there can be pedestrians and bikes where I live. With these new e-scooters and ebikes, they can appear pretty fast snd silently, and aren’t always in full control of their ride when going fast and don’t always obey the traffic rules. I don’t want to confuse them.
Thats why it would have to be a closed system with controlled transmissions rather than omnidirectional radio transmissions.
Oh wow didnt realize it was here already. Going to have to have to make room on the drive. Thanks for the tip
I wonder if it will release before ES6 lol
Lol I didn’t even know there were many crabs in Nebraska. Are you sure it wasnt a crawdad someone stepped on?
Never been to Nebraska?
Who is watching the watchers?
I don’t disagree with that but the article is talking about what arguments are permissible in a court room which is a little different. Same as using tools to commit a crime. It’s not illegal to own or use tools but when used in commission of a crime, this can be a factor in proving elements of a crime that require proof of intention or malice.
This specific thread is about criminality of encryption.
No lmao. How did you get that from all the talk about radio transmission and encryption?
Closed systems don’t require encryption.
You can actually. It just wouldn’t be encrypted.
Everyone? You mean the 10 people that read this thread?
How does covering up a crime not make it worse when it allows you to get away and commit more crime?
Please tell me banking didnt exist before radio transmission.
It’s definitely not integral. You could just control the connection points. Ie, all your software tools on intranet and wired connection only. Any data can be decrypted.
I think it’s contextual. It is definitely relevant to bring into a criminal case that criminals made attempts to obstruct gathering of evidence in commission of the crime. It’s no different than shredding or burning paper files. Evidence of criminals taking steps to hide the criminal activity is how you prove that a transgression is willful rather than negligent. That matters in cases like murder.
Encryption is also criminal in some contexts, like encrypted radio broadcasts on frequencies for public use.
It definitely belongs as a talking point in a courtroom, imo.
You could visit your congressman’s office and hold them accountable. Thats why their office is in your county, but hopefully not too far.