When I first went to the US, the unrealistically low speed limits were one of the first things I noticed when driving.
I kinda assumed that this is by design so that police can pull over anyone they feel like since virtually everyone drives over the speed limit in some areas as it is so ridiculously low.
A lot of reasons. First of all, it's not really their goal to make a good OS for users. They know that 95% will use windows no matter what, especially businesses, because they still more or less have a monopoly, especially in the desktop market.
In other words, any ressources spent on improving the desktop OS experience past the bare minimum is excess because they don't really get anything concrete in return.
Yes, windows is less efficient than other os, but until recently, this wasn't a problem for microsoft since you can just throw more/better hardware at the issue, which is a win win. They have to spend less ressources at optimizing code for better performance and, I imagine, they get a better cut since their hardware partners sell more devices because hardware gets obsoete every couple of years.
And in the server environment, they want it to be increasingly expensive because windows server is mostly used in cases where there is no alternative, and they want it all in their cloud.
Also, a lot of what is annoying about windows is per design. Ads, sponsorship ads, forced accounts, etc.
The only way to get steam hardware, according to support, is to have a credit card, address and steam account from an EU country or other supported country. Or wait if a local reseller (like digitec) gets their hands on them.
"Outrage after Israel releases video abusing of flotilla activists taken hostage on international waters" would be a good start.
But that's the thing. The outrage is seems to be less about the detention and abuse, but more about the public humiliation and mockery..
The narrative is something like "It's justified they were detained, a little bit of force is to be expected, and it probably wasn't as bad since the activists lie in order to make Israel look bad".
But when you have the security minister posting a video where he is gleefully and proudly mocking detainees, that's going too far. It robs the situation of any plausible deniability and forces the origin countries of the activists to express public outrage.
You can bet your ass that if the video was not posted, the expressed outrage of the various countries would be minimal in comparison.
the headlines would look completely differently if it was an adversary of the US doing the same things.
Once again, I'm familiar with the concept of media bias.. I still think the headline is perfectly readonable.
This isn't some fringe thing the Israeli minister did on his own. It's national policy under full responsibility of all of Israel.
The article is about a video posted on twitter by Ben-Gvir. Of course he isn't doing it on his own for personal fun, of course he is doing it on behalf of Israel, but the headline is still pretty reasonable.
But since you agree, please, I beg you to enlighten me. What should the headline be?
France has quite literally used this logic put all the blame on one single person (who doesn't care about France anyway) and take absolutely no real action against Israel. This is not an accident, this is intentional.
Not just France, virtually every western country and Israel itself is doing that. That's literally what the article you posted is reporting on:
Poland's foreign minister called for Ben-Gvir to be banned from entering the country.
The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said Ben-Gvir had "betrayed (the) dignity of his nation".
Netanyahu said Ben-Gvir's conduct was "not in line with Israel's values and norms".
Previous flotilla coverage has been hyper positive of Israel.
Western media tends to have a pro-Israel bias. Most people here are aware of this. The issue is you are doing an incredibly bad job at getting that point across to the point of absurdity..
"Outrage grows after Chinese minister mocks Uyghurs"?
If a Chinese minister posted a video of himself mocking Uyghurs and that video generated outrage, that headline would be pretty reasonable, no?
The specific news story referenced in this post is about minister Ben-Gvir posting a video where he mocks the detainees. The article says "Minister mocks detainees". Please tell me what the ideal headline should be, I'm very curious.
firstly China would be held responsible. Not one single Chinese minister.
Second it would contain the word torture and/or worse.
Ok, and you think that makes for a better headline?
Your post implies that reuters is downplaying or ignoring the abuse and that they are calling the abuse "mocking". That's not the case. The article is about a minister mocking the protesters for getting abused.
In other words, the article's title is absolutely correct.
>Same, but I’m leaning towards the idea that us having numbers alone isn’t enough in this situation if we don’t show why numbers matter. It’s why I’m critical of leaders. Our masses are upset, angry, reactive. We need leaders who can channel and guide the strength of numbers and turn it into something useful
That’s what I mean when I say we need organisation. Leaders sure, but an overreliance on leaders is dangerous too. What we mainly need is organisation and discipline.
>Losing faith in their leader is not the same as losing faith in the ideology.
I completely agree, but it’s a potential opening. As long as they still have faith, it’s virtually impossible to reach anyone. When they are losing faith, it provides an opportunity to spread that doubt to not just a leader, but to other aspects of their worldview. It won’t work with everyone, it takes time and won’t work over night and it maybe won’t work in very aspect, but it’s a start.
>Massie and MTG are perfect examples of this.
We have to make a big distinction between leaders/politicans/progapandists and voters. Leaders/politicians/propagandists always have a political and/or financial incentive to hold their line. They might change leaders if it is beneficial to them, they might even switch sides when it is beneficial for them, but one has to assume it's purely opportunistic.
With voters, it CAN be different. But again, getting people to change their ideology/philosophy/core worldview isn’t easy and doesn’t happen automatically, which is why the “Fuck them, it’s not my job to educate them, they have to change their mind by their own, else I won’t have any contact with them“ attitude is a big mistake in my view because that practically guarantees them voting.
>We should be accepting of whatever help we can get, even if it’s some an-cap that only sides with us 10% of the time.
I don’t even think we should just accept them in our rank or work with them necessarily, I’m saying we need to have some kind of exchange with them in order to oppose their view. I don’t think you disagree with me, but so many online leftists seem to have the opinion that we should simply ignore them or tell them to fuck of until they somehow become radical leftists by themselves. That’s pretty much my main point.
>Alligator Alcatraz and El Salvador are not Dachau or Auschwitz. I agree that we’re not at the level of industrialized genocide like the Nazis were, but we’re deeper than should be allowed.
While I do understand the Nazi Germany comparisons to some degree, I’m not sure how useful they are. Conentration Camps were not unique to Nazi Germany or invented by them. And while Trump and the Trump Regime has some things in common with Nazi Germany and fascism, there are important differences. After the nazis seized power, they had near absolute power very soon. Opposition parties and/or opposition groups were outlawed and members imprisoned on a large scale. Very soon, any effective resistence from within was virtually impossible.
That’s not the case in the US and Trump still has a long way to go until they get there. People’s rights and liberties are definitely under attack, but they do still exist in some form and that must be exploited as long as you still can. Trump has no absolute power, he cannot simply arrest every member of the DSA, etc. Again, there is definitely a tendency towards autocracy, but it’s not done in the same way as in Nazi Germany, so tactics are not the same.
My suggestion is that this is not a situation where voting in better candidates
I'm not talking about voting, I'm talking about building organised mass movements who eventually can excercise leverage to achieve goals.
Maybe I'm too old school, but I still believe that the only way to achieve the radical change is by organised mass movements.
And you can forget about that if you are not even willing to get into contact with people who are losing faith in their right wing leader, but who might not have abandoned all their right wing believes. That's the perfect time to engage and further challenge their views, otherwise nothing will change and they will fall for the next right winger.
I think the solution is doing what we did against this kind of bigotry in 1861 and 1941
It's not 1941, it's not even 1933 yet, although very close to it. And until then, you shouldn't have a working class civil war, but organize..
“Fuck ‘em” isn’t a dismissal of their beliefs, it’s a dismissal of their right to exist.
I'm not sure what your point is or rather I think I'm misunderstanding. Are you suggesting leftists should start to assasinate all trump voters? If yes, that's very silly and not something that will happen. And if it would happen, it would be devestating for the left and only benefit the right. Violence is their game, our game is numbers and leverage.
What I don't understand is how you expect that attitude to change. Bigottry isn't some kind of inate human characteristic, it is a tool/weapon used to divide us and stop us from reaching our goals.
I get that it's nice to imagine people just snapping out of it an realizing all their mistakes, but in the vast majority of cases, this won't happen by sheer magic..
Bigotry is thaught by your environment. And environment won't change without great effort. The right is putting in great effort to change people's environment so they don't get exposed to ideas which are dangerous to them. What is your suggestion, to just let them and give up? You think leftists and organizers of the past did that?
When I say "you", I mean you Americans and online lefties in general, not you personally.. I'm not suggesting you pit yourself in danger, but the only chance of turning around and somehow saving us from global disaster is to build mass movements along class lines.
And I'm not saying bigotry isn't an issue, quite the opposite. But a prerequisite to combat bigottry and organising in general is contact and engagement, and we are so far away from even that. So many people are desperately searching for solution, and the only people giving them some kind of explanation is the right..
There is so much work to do and so little time, and frankly, having likeminded people talking about working class solidarity and rising up against the ruling class while doing jack shit except for ranting online and somehow expect change to happen by sheer magic is very demoralizing..
So if you don't feel you are up to it or feel like you are putting yourself in danger, it does not apply to you. But we as the global left cannot afford to dismiss everyone who might still have bigotted views. And moments of disillusion with their right wing idols are perfect opportunities to work on their bigotry.
It's the only thing combatibg bigotry, it always takes effort and time.
I 100% agree. And no, it shouldn't be our job. But unfortunately, it kinda is.
I mostly grew up in a right wing/conservative environment. The only reason why I'm not a right winger is because I always had a curiosity for different ideas and ways of thinking and wanted to actually understand people's views.
Eventually, as frustrating as it was, I had to come to terms that many people don't share that curiosity. Most people are focused on other things and only seem to kind of adopt concepts they are told, often without really thinking about it.
And more often than not, it's right wingers telling them stuff and it's right wing stuff that sticks, as right wing stuff is quite simple and easily digestable (simple concepts, clear enemy, simple problems and simple solutions). However, oftentimes, it does not stick very hard and the only reason why it sticks is because they are simply never challenged. In a lot of cases, it slowly falls apart if you challenge them, as long as you don't give them an easy excuse to dismiss you.
But unfortunately, this is typically not a fast process. So yeah, it is very frustrating, especially because people have access to all the knowledge they need.
But the hard reality is that chances are they will sooner go down a crazy right wing conspiracy rabit whole. In order for them to move towards the left just by themselves, they would need to throw their entire understanding of virtually everything they know out the window, and by that point, the right is more comfortable because you can just build your world however you want.
It's very likely that they don't learn what they aren't thaught. You don't teach anything if there is no contact, and moments like this are opportunities for contact.
Yesyes, I get it, it's not your job to teach them. The issue is though that nobody else will, except of course propagandists on the right who are happy to teach them.
It is kind of baffling to me that many don't seem to have an analysis/understanding of maga beyond "stupidity and racism".
Of course that's a big part, but by itself, it's only scratching the surface?
And you don't have sympathy for Trump voters turning cloak? Seriously? I hope you can at least pretend because you aren't getting out of this mess without working with people like that. Else you might as well give up now.
Don't worry, Microsoft has you covered. By then you will have windows cloud copilot edition streamed directly to your device. Your device will only need a little bit of power (you can buy it for only 1999$). Just don't forget to pay your monthly subscription..
This is probably unpopular, but Taiwan is imo not a good example of imperialism. Taiwan is where the old government has fled to and where the government there officially still claims to be the rightful goverment of China. Their official name is republic of China, which obviously leads to tensions with the "people's republic of China".
Imperialism is when a nation excercises significant influence and control over other independent nations. Taiwan is not an independent nation, they are a rival/competitor with similar regional claims.
A better example of Chinese imperialism could be their economic initiatives in Africa.
When I first went to the US, the unrealistically low speed limits were one of the first things I noticed when driving.
I kinda assumed that this is by design so that police can pull over anyone they feel like since virtually everyone drives over the speed limit in some areas as it is so ridiculously low.
A lot of reasons. First of all, it's not really their goal to make a good OS for users. They know that 95% will use windows no matter what, especially businesses, because they still more or less have a monopoly, especially in the desktop market.
In other words, any ressources spent on improving the desktop OS experience past the bare minimum is excess because they don't really get anything concrete in return.
Yes, windows is less efficient than other os, but until recently, this wasn't a problem for microsoft since you can just throw more/better hardware at the issue, which is a win win. They have to spend less ressources at optimizing code for better performance and, I imagine, they get a better cut since their hardware partners sell more devices because hardware gets obsoete every couple of years.
And in the server environment, they want it to be increasingly expensive because windows server is mostly used in cases where there is no alternative, and they want it all in their cloud.
Also, a lot of what is annoying about windows is per design. Ads, sponsorship ads, forced accounts, etc.
The only way to get steam hardware, according to support, is to have a credit card, address and steam account from an EU country or other supported country. Or wait if a local reseller (like digitec) gets their hands on them.
Fedora has age verification?
But that's the thing. The outrage is seems to be less about the detention and abuse, but more about the public humiliation and mockery..
The narrative is something like "It's justified they were detained, a little bit of force is to be expected, and it probably wasn't as bad since the activists lie in order to make Israel look bad".
But when you have the security minister posting a video where he is gleefully and proudly mocking detainees, that's going too far. It robs the situation of any plausible deniability and forces the origin countries of the activists to express public outrage.
You can bet your ass that if the video was not posted, the expressed outrage of the various countries would be minimal in comparison.
Once again, I'm familiar with the concept of media bias.. I still think the headline is perfectly readonable.
The article is about a video posted on twitter by Ben-Gvir. Of course he isn't doing it on his own for personal fun, of course he is doing it on behalf of Israel, but the headline is still pretty reasonable.
But since you agree, please, I beg you to enlighten me. What should the headline be?
Not just France, virtually every western country and Israel itself is doing that. That's literally what the article you posted is reporting on:
Poland's foreign minister called for Ben-Gvir to be banned from entering the country.
The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said Ben-Gvir had "betrayed (the) dignity of his nation".
Netanyahu said Ben-Gvir's conduct was "not in line with Israel's values and norms".
Bellow there are two seperate events. They are related in some ways, but they are still 2 separate events happening at different points in time:
Because they are two seperate events happening at different times, journalists will write seperate articles with separate headlines.
The one in your post was about event number 2. But there are other articles about event number 1:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/freed-gaza-flotilla-activists-allege-israeli-abuse-including-rape-2026-05-22/
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gaza-aid-flotilla-says-israeli-forces-intercepted-41-vessels-10-still-sailing-2026-05-19/
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/israels-treatment-gaza-flotilla-members-is-abominable-canada-pm-carney-says-2026-05-20/
Western media tends to have a pro-Israel bias. Most people here are aware of this. The issue is you are doing an incredibly bad job at getting that point across to the point of absurdity..
If a Chinese minister posted a video of himself mocking Uyghurs and that video generated outrage, that headline would be pretty reasonable, no?
The specific news story referenced in this post is about minister Ben-Gvir posting a video where he mocks the detainees. The article says "Minister mocks detainees". Please tell me what the ideal headline should be, I'm very curious.
Ok, and you think that makes for a better headline?
Well I guess no wonder people have terrible reading comprehension..
I still don't get what reuters has done wrong..
Your post implies that reuters is downplaying or ignoring the abuse and that they are calling the abuse "mocking". That's not the case. The article is about a minister mocking the protesters for getting abused.
In other words, the article's title is absolutely correct.
>Same, but I’m leaning towards the idea that us having numbers alone isn’t enough in this situation if we don’t show why numbers matter. It’s why I’m critical of leaders. Our masses are upset, angry, reactive. We need leaders who can channel and guide the strength of numbers and turn it into something useful
That’s what I mean when I say we need organisation. Leaders sure, but an overreliance on leaders is dangerous too. What we mainly need is organisation and discipline.
>Losing faith in their leader is not the same as losing faith in the ideology.
I completely agree, but it’s a potential opening. As long as they still have faith, it’s virtually impossible to reach anyone. When they are losing faith, it provides an opportunity to spread that doubt to not just a leader, but to other aspects of their worldview. It won’t work with everyone, it takes time and won’t work over night and it maybe won’t work in very aspect, but it’s a start.
>Massie and MTG are perfect examples of this.
We have to make a big distinction between leaders/politicans/progapandists and voters. Leaders/politicians/propagandists always have a political and/or financial incentive to hold their line. They might change leaders if it is beneficial to them, they might even switch sides when it is beneficial for them, but one has to assume it's purely opportunistic.
With voters, it CAN be different. But again, getting people to change their ideology/philosophy/core worldview isn’t easy and doesn’t happen automatically, which is why the “Fuck them, it’s not my job to educate them, they have to change their mind by their own, else I won’t have any contact with them“ attitude is a big mistake in my view because that practically guarantees them voting.
>We should be accepting of whatever help we can get, even if it’s some an-cap that only sides with us 10% of the time.
I don’t even think we should just accept them in our rank or work with them necessarily, I’m saying we need to have some kind of exchange with them in order to oppose their view. I don’t think you disagree with me, but so many online leftists seem to have the opinion that we should simply ignore them or tell them to fuck of until they somehow become radical leftists by themselves. That’s pretty much my main point.
>Alligator Alcatraz and El Salvador are not Dachau or Auschwitz. I agree that we’re not at the level of industrialized genocide like the Nazis were, but we’re deeper than should be allowed.
While I do understand the Nazi Germany comparisons to some degree, I’m not sure how useful they are. Conentration Camps were not unique to Nazi Germany or invented by them. And while Trump and the Trump Regime has some things in common with Nazi Germany and fascism, there are important differences. After the nazis seized power, they had near absolute power very soon. Opposition parties and/or opposition groups were outlawed and members imprisoned on a large scale. Very soon, any effective resistence from within was virtually impossible.
That’s not the case in the US and Trump still has a long way to go until they get there. People’s rights and liberties are definitely under attack, but they do still exist in some form and that must be exploited as long as you still can. Trump has no absolute power, he cannot simply arrest every member of the DSA, etc. Again, there is definitely a tendency towards autocracy, but it’s not done in the same way as in Nazi Germany, so tactics are not the same.
I'm not talking about voting, I'm talking about building organised mass movements who eventually can excercise leverage to achieve goals.
Maybe I'm too old school, but I still believe that the only way to achieve the radical change is by organised mass movements.
And you can forget about that if you are not even willing to get into contact with people who are losing faith in their right wing leader, but who might not have abandoned all their right wing believes. That's the perfect time to engage and further challenge their views, otherwise nothing will change and they will fall for the next right winger.
It's not 1941, it's not even 1933 yet, although very close to it. And until then, you shouldn't have a working class civil war, but organize..
I'm not sure what your point is or rather I think I'm misunderstanding. Are you suggesting leftists should start to assasinate all trump voters? If yes, that's very silly and not something that will happen. And if it would happen, it would be devestating for the left and only benefit the right. Violence is their game, our game is numbers and leverage.
But yeah, I think we are talking past eachother.
Or, alternatively, use the stationary nature of indoor machines to make it less boring. I typically read. Or maybe watch a show or movie.
Outside is great too of course, but bad weather can be hard to overcome depending on where you live.
What I don't understand is how you expect that attitude to change. Bigottry isn't some kind of inate human characteristic, it is a tool/weapon used to divide us and stop us from reaching our goals.
I get that it's nice to imagine people just snapping out of it an realizing all their mistakes, but in the vast majority of cases, this won't happen by sheer magic..
Bigotry is thaught by your environment. And environment won't change without great effort. The right is putting in great effort to change people's environment so they don't get exposed to ideas which are dangerous to them. What is your suggestion, to just let them and give up? You think leftists and organizers of the past did that?
When I say "you", I mean you Americans and online lefties in general, not you personally.. I'm not suggesting you pit yourself in danger, but the only chance of turning around and somehow saving us from global disaster is to build mass movements along class lines.
And I'm not saying bigotry isn't an issue, quite the opposite. But a prerequisite to combat bigottry and organising in general is contact and engagement, and we are so far away from even that. So many people are desperately searching for solution, and the only people giving them some kind of explanation is the right..
There is so much work to do and so little time, and frankly, having likeminded people talking about working class solidarity and rising up against the ruling class while doing jack shit except for ranting online and somehow expect change to happen by sheer magic is very demoralizing..
So if you don't feel you are up to it or feel like you are putting yourself in danger, it does not apply to you. But we as the global left cannot afford to dismiss everyone who might still have bigotted views. And moments of disillusion with their right wing idols are perfect opportunities to work on their bigotry.
It's the only thing combatibg bigotry, it always takes effort and time.
I 100% agree. And no, it shouldn't be our job. But unfortunately, it kinda is.
I mostly grew up in a right wing/conservative environment. The only reason why I'm not a right winger is because I always had a curiosity for different ideas and ways of thinking and wanted to actually understand people's views.
Eventually, as frustrating as it was, I had to come to terms that many people don't share that curiosity. Most people are focused on other things and only seem to kind of adopt concepts they are told, often without really thinking about it.
And more often than not, it's right wingers telling them stuff and it's right wing stuff that sticks, as right wing stuff is quite simple and easily digestable (simple concepts, clear enemy, simple problems and simple solutions). However, oftentimes, it does not stick very hard and the only reason why it sticks is because they are simply never challenged. In a lot of cases, it slowly falls apart if you challenge them, as long as you don't give them an easy excuse to dismiss you.
But unfortunately, this is typically not a fast process. So yeah, it is very frustrating, especially because people have access to all the knowledge they need.
But the hard reality is that chances are they will sooner go down a crazy right wing conspiracy rabit whole. In order for them to move towards the left just by themselves, they would need to throw their entire understanding of virtually everything they know out the window, and by that point, the right is more comfortable because you can just build your world however you want.
It's very likely that they don't learn what they aren't thaught. You don't teach anything if there is no contact, and moments like this are opportunities for contact.
Yesyes, I get it, it's not your job to teach them. The issue is though that nobody else will, except of course propagandists on the right who are happy to teach them.
It is kind of baffling to me that many don't seem to have an analysis/understanding of maga beyond "stupidity and racism".
Of course that's a big part, but by itself, it's only scratching the surface?
And you don't have sympathy for Trump voters turning cloak? Seriously? I hope you can at least pretend because you aren't getting out of this mess without working with people like that. Else you might as well give up now.
Don't worry, Microsoft has you covered. By then you will have windows cloud copilot edition streamed directly to your device. Your device will only need a little bit of power (you can buy it for only 1999$). Just don't forget to pay your monthly subscription..
This is probably unpopular, but Taiwan is imo not a good example of imperialism. Taiwan is where the old government has fled to and where the government there officially still claims to be the rightful goverment of China. Their official name is republic of China, which obviously leads to tensions with the "people's republic of China".
Imperialism is when a nation excercises significant influence and control over other independent nations. Taiwan is not an independent nation, they are a rival/competitor with similar regional claims.
A better example of Chinese imperialism could be their economic initiatives in Africa.