They say it'll have high quality public transport. If this is the same area that a city planner once talked about then it'll be quite troublesome. Using models they can predict how effective the mobility will be. For the neighborhood he talked about the plans would not work at all.
If I investigate this plan it seems it'll just be bus lines. At the moment just 2 stops. For 6.000 houses. That seems like a failure.
With the housing shortage they might get sold anyway.
If I'm not mistaken Belgium had the approach that non competes are valid. However, if the employee cannot find anything else the company has to pay that person for the duration of the non compete.
Thousands of nuclear powered ships manned by the whomever agrees to the lowest wage. This while ignoring the alternative fuels various vessels are switching to.
Considering the cable was likely cut by just dragging the anchor over the seafloor, there's not much to find.
Dropping an anchor isn't done accidentally. There's a pretty high risk for things to go wrong. Your assertion just doesn't make sense. It isn't "perfectly plausible" to drop anchor accidentally, nor is it to drag it for ages.
Agreed, that's the way the rule was written. A few YouTube people commented months ago about the possibility to use that loophole.
The 2026 regulations have loads of such loopholes. E.g. that cars are hard to follow are partly due to yet another loophole.
In a Dutch interview he said it's way slower. You're really twisting his words.
That was Google Nest. Though those cameras always gave you 3 hours to watch back footage, even without a subscription.
They say it'll have high quality public transport. If this is the same area that a city planner once talked about then it'll be quite troublesome. Using models they can predict how effective the mobility will be. For the neighborhood he talked about the plans would not work at all.
If I investigate this plan it seems it'll just be bus lines. At the moment just 2 stops. For 6.000 houses. That seems like a failure.
With the housing shortage they might get sold anyway.
If I'm not mistaken Belgium had the approach that non competes are valid. However, if the employee cannot find anything else the company has to pay that person for the duration of the non compete.
Right to move? How is that arranged or made legal?
It's not a weird vendetta. He's been given some money to be against solar and wind.
You're talking about companies with offices in the US. I'm talking about foreign countries. E.g. Postnl (company without offices in the US).
How would a foreign country collect this in behalf of the US? No system has been setup for this by the US.
EU, UK and others have systems in place to make this possible. The US hasn't.
In the EU similar stuff is promoted by companies wanting to profit from supplying the various required software.
Calc has loads of small papercuts (tiny usability issues) which added together make it quite horrible to use. It's not polished.
Pretty sure Collabora (company) offers such services.
Thousands of nuclear powered ships manned by the whomever agrees to the lowest wage. This while ignoring the alternative fuels various vessels are switching to.
Tried upgrading the Bios and the firmware?
To add: If you cancel a contract that was 80% finished then that is not a saving. It means you likely wasted 80%.
It really feels like penny wise, pound foolish. Only focusing on what's paid out and thought about the benefit.
Though the simplistic approach is likely intentional.
The tariffs are paid by the importers. It'll negatively affect things in Canada.
Agreed, which is why it's funny that certain crowds think gloves are magic.
Dropping an anchor isn't done accidentally. There's a pretty high risk for things to go wrong. Your assertion just doesn't make sense. It isn't "perfectly plausible" to drop anchor accidentally, nor is it to drag it for ages.
I like his sarcasm.
https://youtu.be/jNmrLRf_2_4
George misstated what happened to his engine. See video. I'm guessing that's not the only thing he misstated.