Subject: Judge Andrew S. Oldham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Prepared: August 13, 2026
Method: Open-source research using government records, court materials, institutional records, contemporaneous reporting, and advocacy research. Advocacy sources are identified as such and should not be treated as neutral authorities where characterization or opinion is involved.
A. Primary and Government Sources
A1. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee — Nomination of Andrew Oldham
Source: U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Document: Nomination of Andrew Oldham to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit — Responses to Questions for the Record
Relevance: Primary-source confirmation material containing Oldham’s own written answers regarding his legal philosophy, precedent, Federalist Society membership and participation, and other issues raised during his confirmation.
Notable evidence: Oldham acknowledged joining the Federalist Society while in law school and attending its annual convention.
A2. Congressional Record — Senate Debate on Oldham Nomination
Source: U.S. Congress / Library of Congress
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: Congressional Record, Vol. 164, No. 121
Relevance: Contemporary Senate debate regarding Oldham’s nomination. Includes Sen. Richard Durbin’s opposition and discussion of Oldham’s Federalist Society membership, Texas litigation record, Voting Rights Act work, and refusal during his hearing to state whether Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided.
Caution: Statements by senators during nomination debates are political arguments, not independent factual findings. Underlying factual claims should be cross-referenced against primary records.
A3. Congressional Record — Senate Support for Oldham Nomination
Source: U.S. Congress / Library of Congress
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: Congressional Record, Vol. 164, No. 121
Relevance: Provides the affirmative case presented for Oldham’s confirmation and useful counterweight to opposition materials. Records his education, clerkships, ABA “unanimously well-qualified” rating, and endorsements from attorneys and public officials, including Democrats.
A4. Texas Attorney General — Confirmation Announcement
Source: Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: AG Paxton Congratulates Former Texas Deputy Solicitor General Andrew Oldham on His Confirmation to the 5th Circuit
Relevance: Texas government confirmation of Oldham’s employment history. Documents his service as Texas Deputy Solicitor General, representation of Texas before federal courts and the Supreme Court, subsequent service as Gov. Greg Abbott’s general counsel, Alito clerkship, DOJ Office of Legal Counsel service, and Trump nomination.
The Texas AG additionally identified Oldham as the sixth Trump judicial nominee who was a current or former Texas Attorney General employee, providing useful evidence of the Texas AG office’s role as a personnel pipeline into the federal judiciary.
B. Institutional / Professional Sources
B1. Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham Biography
Source: The Federalist Society
Entry: Andrew Oldham / U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
https://fedsoc.org/ttd-topics/andrew-oldham
Relevance: Institutional biography confirming Oldham’s professional trajectory:
General Counsel to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
Deputy Solicitor General of Texas
Kellogg Hansen appellate practice
Clerkship with Justice Samuel Alito
Clerkship with D.C. Circuit Judge David Sentelle
DOJ Office of Legal Counsel service
University of Virginia
Cambridge University
Harvard Law School
Caution: The Federalist Society is an ideologically aligned organization rather than a neutral biographical authority. It is, however, a primary source regarding its own relationship and activities involving Oldham.
B2. Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham Contributor/Event Record
Relevance: Documents Oldham’s continued participation in Federalist Society programming, including appearances discussing federalism, originalism, constitutional interpretation, and related legal subjects.
This is useful for distinguishing a historical membership entry from an ongoing professional association.
C. Voting Rights and Civil Rights Record
C1. Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights — Opposition to Confirmation
Source: The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Date: 2018
Document: Oppose the Confirmation of Andrew Oldham to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Relevance: Detailed compilation of Oldham’s pre-judicial litigation record, including:
Texas voter-identification litigation
Shelby County v. Holder
Voting Rights Act Section 5
Texas SB 14
EEOC employment guidance
immigration litigation
environmental/regulatory litigation
The report quotes Oldham’s Supreme Court filings and identifies underlying cases, making it particularly useful as an index into his pre-bench litigation history.
Important limitation: The Leadership Conference expressly opposed Oldham’s confirmation and is an advocacy organization. Its descriptions of Oldham as an “ideologue” or similar characterizations are advocacy positions, not neutral findings. Underlying filings and court decisions are stronger evidence than the organization’s conclusions.
D. Contemporary Reporting on Appointment
D1. Texas Tribune — Oldham Confirmation
Source: The Texas Tribune
Date: July 18, 2018
Article: Andrew Oldham confirmed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
Relevance: Contemporary reporting on Oldham’s confirmation, including:
50–49 Senate confirmation
service as Gov. Greg Abbott’s top legal adviser
relative youth at appointment
relationship to other Trump Fifth Circuit appointments
controversy surrounding his Brown v. Board of Education confirmation-hearing response
E. August 2026 Mail-Ballot Litigation
E1. San Antonio Express-News — Texas Mail-Ballot Decision
Source: San Antonio Express-News
Date: August 13, 2026
Article: Texas can proceed with mail ballot ID requirements, appeals court rules
Relevance: Contemporary reporting on the Fifth Circuit’s August 2026 decision reinstating major provisions of Texas Senate Bill 1 affecting mail voting.
The report attributes the following language directly to Judge Oldham’s opinion:
“It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud.”
and:
“That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself.”
The report also explains that the panel reversed a district-court ruling involving the Americans with Disabilities Act and concluded that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a sufficiently substantial future risk of disenfranchisement.
Note: The actual Fifth Circuit opinion should be preferred as the definitive authority for Oldham’s language and legal reasoning.
F. Federalist Society Membership
F1. Oldham’s Senate Questionnaire / Written Responses
Oldham’s own confirmation responses establish that he joined the Federalist Society while attending law school.
He explained:
“I joined the Federalist Society because I enjoyed the speakers and debates they hosted at my law school.”
He also acknowledged attendance at the organization’s annual convention.
This primary-source evidence should be preferred over secondary descriptions of his Federalist Society affiliation.
G. Source Assessment
The factual backbone of this profile is supported primarily by:
U.S. Senate records and Oldham’s own confirmation responses;
Texas government records;
federal judicial and institutional records;
Oldham’s own legal filings and judicial opinions;
contemporaneous reporting from established news organizations.
Advocacy organizations were used principally to identify litigation, quotations, controversies, and additional primary records. Their ideological conclusions were not treated as independently established facts.
The available evidence establishes Oldham’s education and employment history, federal clerkships, DOJ service, work in the Texas Solicitor General’s office, service to Gov. Greg Abbott, Federalist Society affiliation, Trump nomination, Senate confirmation, pre-bench voting-rights litigation, and subsequent judicial record.
The evidence reviewed does not establish that the Federalist Society, Leonard Leo, Donald Trump, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, or another outside actor directs Oldham’s judicial decisions. No such claim should be inferred from documented professional associations alone.
H. Original Article Prompting Review
Mother Jones
A Trump Judge Called Mail-in Ballots a “Threat to Democracy”
August 2026
This article served as the starting point for the investigation. Claims concerning Oldham’s biography, institutional relationships, and earlier litigation history were separately checked against government, institutional, and contemporary sources wherever possible.
Current role: Cook County State’s Attorney, sworn in December 2024. She runs the second-largest prosecutor’s office in the United States.
Background: Fourth-generation Chicagoan, raised on the Northwest Side. University of Illinois graduate; J.D. from Chicago-Kent. Her career is unusually broad: 10 years as a Cook County assistant state’s attorney → criminal defense attorney → Cook County Circuit Court judge → Illinois First District Appellate Court justice → State’s Attorney.
Political/prosecutorial posture: Burke ran substantially on restoring a more aggressive, professionalized prosecution model after Kim Foxx. One of her first actions was directing prosecutors to seek detention in murder cases and specified violent felonies.
The Saracco pressure point
[!IMPORTANT]
Saracco has now been prosecuted — but Burke’s office specifically declined to prosecute him as a felony. That’s the sharper accountability issue now.
Off-duty ICE agent Adam Saracco pleaded guilty yesterday, August 12, to misdemeanor battery for attacking 68-year-old attorney/activist Robert Held in Brookfield. He received one year of court supervision.
Brookfield police initially presented the matter to Burke’s office. Her prosecutors declined felony charges and advised that it was more appropriately handled as misdemeanor battery; Brookfield police then directly filed that charge.
Held repeatedly asked Burke’s office to upgrade the case. Former federal chief judge Ruben Castillo publicly joined that pressure, urging Burke to reconsider Saracco’s conduct and criticizing the difficulty victims were having obtaining accountability.
The especially useful fact now is that Saracco ultimately admitted guilt. Burke’s office nevertheless maintained that felony treatment wasn’t justified: prosecutors reportedly concluded they would have to prove Saracco knew Held was over 60, and said they rarely pursue aggravated battery solely because an attack occurred in a qualifying public location.
So for a letter-writing campaign, I’d frame the demand as:
“Explain why your office declined felony prosecution of Adam Saracco, what charging analysis was performed, and whether your office will adopt a different policy for future assaults committed by federal law-enforcement officers against Cook County residents.”
That’s harder to dismiss than simply “prosecute Saracco,” because the misdemeanor prosecution has now concluded.
Public official contact channels
These are official/public channels only:
Cook County State’s Attorney: Eileen O’Neill Burke
🟢 High confidence: The most effective factual hook is not “why won’t you prosecute him?” It’s “why did your office refuse felony charges when presented with this case, particularly now that Saracco has admitted the underlying battery?” That puts the demand squarely on a discretionary decision made by Burke’s office rather than something she can answer with “the case was prosecuted.”
Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell
Office of the Attorney General
1 Ashburton Place, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
For correspondence specifically concerning transgender youth / gender-affirming healthcare, reprojustice@mass.gov is particularly relevant: Campbell’s own May 2026 advisory directs questions concerning gender-affirming care there.
🟢 High confidence: Oldham isn’t merely a generic Trump-appointed conservative judge. He came to the bench through a remarkably concentrated pipeline: Federalist Society → Alito clerkship → Texas solicitor-general apparatus → Greg Abbott’s inner legal circle → Trump → Fifth Circuit. His pre-bench record already included aggressive positions against Voting Rights Act protections and federal regulatory power. His August 2026 mail-ballot language is therefore much more consistent with his established legal worldview than an isolated rhetorical flourish.
Basic identification
Field
OSINT finding
Full name
Andrew Stephen Oldham
Born
1978, Richmond, Virginia
Current position
U.S. Circuit Judge, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
Circuit
Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi
Nominated by
Donald Trump
Confirmed
July 18, 2018
Confirmation vote
50–49
Commission
July 19, 2018
Education
University of Virginia BA; Cambridge MPhil; Harvard JD, magna cum laude
Federalist Society
Member since 2002
SCOTUS clerkship
Justice Samuel Alito, 2008–09
Prior Texas role
Deputy Solicitor General
Immediately pre-bench
General Counsel to Gov. Greg Abbott
The Fifth Circuit itself confirms his current judgeship, while the Senate records the extremely narrow 50–49 confirmation.
The pipeline
His résumé is almost laboratory-grade conservative appellate-law grooming.
2001: University of Virginia, highest honors.
2002: MPhil at Cambridge; Truman Scholar.
2005: Harvard Law, magna cum laude. He was an editor of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, a publication closely associated with conservative/originalist legal scholarship.
2005–06: Clerk for D.C. Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a prominent conservative federal judge.
2006–08: Attorney-adviser, DOJ Office of Legal Counsel, during George W. Bush’s presidency.
2008–09: Clerk for Samuel Alito at SCOTUS.
2009–12: Kellogg Hansen in Washington, specializing in appellate litigation.
2012 onward: Deputy Solicitor General of Texas.
Then he moves even closer to political power:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott → Deputy General Counsel → General Counsel.
In that last role, he advised Abbott and managed litigation in which the governor had an interest. Texas AG Ken Paxton specifically celebrated Oldham’s elevation to the Fifth Circuit and noted that he was the sixth Trump judicial nominee who was a current or former Texas AG employee.
That Texas legal network is worth paying attention to. It became one of the major institutional feeders for conservative federal litigation.
Federalist Society connection
🟢 Documented, not inferred.
Oldham has reportedly been a Federalist Society member since 2002, meaning this relationship predates his judgeship by roughly sixteen years.
And this wasn’t simply “I paid dues in law school.”
He has continued appearing at Federalist Society programming as a federal judge, including discussions about originalism, federalism and constitutional interpretation. The Federalist Society maintains an extensive contributor/event page for him.
Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham appearances
The broader institutional context matters: Leonard Leo publicly described Trump’s judicial appointments as advancing the Federalist Society’s project of returning power to states and limiting federal authority.
That doesn’t establish that Leo personally selected Oldham. I haven’t found reliable evidence supporting that stronger claim, so I wouldn’t put it in an OSINT dossier as fact.
Voting rights: this goes back
years
This is the piece I think matters most given the Mother Jones story.
Oldham’s record concerning voting restrictions predates becoming a judge.
While representing Texas, he defended the state’s voter-ID regime and attacked Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the provision that required jurisdictions with histories of racial discrimination to obtain federal preclearance before changing voting rules.
In a Supreme Court filing, Oldham argued that the Court should declare the reauthorization of Section 5 unconstitutional.
That matters because Texas’s voter-ID law was subsequently found by a federal district court to impose an unconstitutional burden and discriminatory effects against Black and Hispanic voters; litigation over the law continued through the Fifth Circuit.
So:
[!IMPORTANT]
The 2026 mail-ballot decision isn’t Oldham’s first encounter with restricting ballot access. Voting-law litigation was part of his professional identity before Trump ever nominated him.
The August 2026 ruling
This is actually slightly different from what I initially expected from the headline you sent.
The new case concerns Texas SB 1, including restrictions affecting mail voting and assistance for voters with disabilities.
Oldham wrote:
“It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud.”
and then:
“That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself.”
That’s unusually categorical language for an appellate opinion.
The underlying litigation involved provisions requiring identification numbers matching state records, restrictions on people assisting voters, and restrictions on paid voter assistance/canvassing.
A district court had blocked nine provisions after finding violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and §504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Fifth Circuit reversed. Importantly, much of Oldham’s ruling rested on standing, rather than finding every challenged provision substantively compliant with disability law.
Oldham also characterized the appellate court’s repeated intervention in the litigation as:
“an exhausting game of Whac-A-Mole”
to correct what he called the district court’s mishandling of the case.
That rhetoric is notable in its own right.
There’s another mail-ballot case
Oldham also wrote the Fifth Circuit decision invalidating Mississippi’s five-day grace period for mail ballots that were postmarked by Election Day.
The panel held that federal Election Day statutes require ballots to be received by Election Day—not merely cast by then.
That case went to SCOTUS, where arguments occurred in March 2026. The implications extend well beyond Mississippi because numerous states and D.C. accept at least some ballots arriving after Election Day.
So we’re not looking at one stray sentence.
There is an identifiable Oldham jurisprudential track concerning mail voting.
Other ideological indicators
His confirmation generated substantial opposition from civil-rights organizations.
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights documented positions including his:
defense of Texas voter-ID restrictions;
challenge to Voting Rights Act §5;
opposition to EEOC guidance concerning criminal-history discrimination;
participation in Texas litigation challenging Obama-era immigration policies.
Alliance for Justice separately compiled his record and currently lists him among potential conservative Supreme Court candidates.
There’s another eyebrow-raiser from his confirmation hearing.
Asked whether Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided, Oldham declined to give a yes/no answer. He also declined to directly answer whether voting discrimination still existed in America. That’s reported by AFJ, an advocacy organization opposed to his nomination, so I would describe the source accordingly rather than treating its characterization as neutral reporting.
His written Senate answers were more conventional. For example, he said that Roe, Casey, and Obergefell were binding Supreme Court precedent that a lower-court judge must faithfully apply.
The Fifth Circuit ecosystem matters
Oldham isn’t operating in a vacuum.
The Fifth Circuit has become arguably the most important conservative appellate court in the country. Reuters reported this year that it has repeatedly produced decisions to the right even of the current 6–3 conservative Supreme Court, resulting in SCOTUS repeatedly reversing or pausing Fifth Circuit rulings.
And notice the company Oldham keeps showing up with.
The Mississippi mail-ballot panel consisted of:
Andrew Oldham — Trump
James Ho — Trump
Stuart Kyle Duncan — Trump
The Fifth Circuit’s current calendar likewise shows Oldham sitting with Duncan and Cory Wilson, another Trump appointee.
That’s not evidence of coordination; appellate panels are assigned institutionally. But it illustrates the structural transformation of the circuit.
Network map
The useful OSINT relationship graph currently looks like:
Andrew Oldham
↓
Federalist Society — member since 2002, recurring speaker
↓
David Sentelle — D.C. Circuit clerkship
↓
George W. Bush DOJ / OLC
↓
Samuel Alito — SCOTUS clerkship
↓
Kellogg Hansen — appellate litigation
↓
Texas Attorney General’s Office
↓
Greg Abbott — Deputy GC → General Counsel
↓
Ken Paxton / Texas conservative litigation ecosystem
↓
Donald Trump — nomination
↓
Federalist Society-era Republican Senate — 50–49 confirmation
↓
Fifth Circuit
🟢 Every major employment/appointment edge in that chain is publicly documented.
Public contact / accountability surface
Because he’s a sitting federal judge, I’d keep any contact campaign strictly to official public judicial channels rather than hunting for personal addresses, relatives, private phones, etc.
His official institution is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The court’s public judges directory identifies him as an active circuit judge.
The Senate Judiciary Committee also maintains his original nomination hearing and written responses, which are particularly useful primary-source material:
Oldham's 2018 Senate Judiciary nomination record
Oldham's written answers to senators
Assessment
🟢 High confidence: I’d characterize Oldham as an unusually well-credentialed product of the modern conservative legal movement rather than simply “a Republican judge.” His career links the Federalist Society/originalist academic ecosystem, Alito’s chambers, Texas’s aggressive state-litigation operation under Abbott, and Trump’s appellate appointments.
🟡 Moderate confidence on motive: The evidence establishes his institutional affiliations and a consistent body of voting/federalism jurisprudence. It doesn’t establish that his decisions are dictated by Trump, Abbott, the Federalist Society, Leonard Leo, or anyone else, and I wouldn’t blur that distinction.
The really interesting next OSINT layer would be a decision matrix of Oldham’s major opinions—voting rights, abortion, LGBTQ rights, guns, immigration, environmental regulation, executive power, disability rights—and then flag which ones SCOTUS subsequently reversed or blocked. That would turn this from a biography into a measurable jurisprudential profile.
Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell
Office of the Attorney General
1 Ashburton Place, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
For correspondence specifically concerning transgender youth / gender-affirming healthcare, reprojustice@mass.gov is particularly relevant: Campbell’s own May 2026 advisory directs questions concerning gender-affirming care there.
Name Board role/status Public affiliation Public phone Public email Public mailing address Source Notes Called Emailed Letter sent Response / notes
Brian D. Ballard Presidential trustee Ballard Partners 850-577-0444 ballard@ballardpartners.com 201 E Park Avenue, 5th Floor, Tallahassee, FL 32301 https://ballardpartners.com/about/who-we-are/ Direct professional contact published in public-government proposal.
Maria Bartiromo Presidential trustee Fox Business 888-369-4762 viewersfeedback@foxnews.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.foxnews.com/contact Fox public viewer-feedback channel; route letter through Kennedy Center.
Pamela Bondi Presidential trustee Public figure / former federal official c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Mary Helen Bowers Presidential trustee Ballet Beautiful training@balletbeautiful.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://balletbeautiful.com/about/mary-helen-bowers/ Public business email; Kennedy Center routing preferred for board matter.
Hannah F. Buchan Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No verified direct professional channel found in this pass.
Robert Castellani Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No verified direct professional channel found in this pass.
Elaine Chao Presidential trustee Public figure c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Pamella Roland DeVos Presidential trustee Pamella Roland c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Patricia Duggan Presidential trustee Trish Joy Foundation 727-244-1029 200 Garden Ave N, Suite B, Clearwater, FL 33755 https://www.grantmakers.io/profiles/v1/461403949-trish-joy-foundation/ Public foundation contact from IRS Form 990 data.
John Falconetti Presidential trustee / Treasurer Drummond Press 800-247-5361 2472 Dennis St, Jacksonville, FL 32204 https://www.filmjax.com/production-guide/production-guide-form/drummond-press Public business contact; Florida corporate records identify Falconetti as CEO.
Emilia May Fanjul Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Jennifer Fischer Presidential trustee / Vice Chair c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Officer: Vice Chair. Use Kennedy Center routing.
Lynette Friess Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Sergio Gor Presidential trustee / Secretary U.S. Government c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Officer: Secretary. Kennedy Center routing is directly relevant.
Pamela Gross Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Lee Greenwood Presidential trustee Lee Greenwood / music business c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center routing for board correspondence.
Kate Adamson Haselwood Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No personal-data broker information included.
Laura Ingraham Presidential trustee Fox News 888-369-4762 viewersfeedback@foxnews.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.foxnews.com/contact Fox public viewer-feedback channel.
Dana Kraft Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Mindy Levine Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Lynda Lomangino Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Barbara Long Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Allison Lutnick Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Douglas Manchester Presidential trustee Manchester Financial Group c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing; business affiliation included for targeting.
Laura Perlmutter Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Catherine B. Reynolds Presidential trustee Catherine B. Reynolds Foundation c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Denise Saul Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Dan Scavino Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Public institutional White House correspondence channel.
Cheri Summerall Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Donald J. Trump Chair / Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Chair. Public institutional White House correspondence channel.
Usha Vance Trustee (listed in 2025 litigation / 2026 board materials) White House c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://beatty.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/beatty.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/kennedycenter.pdf Included because current litigation names her as a trustee; verify against latest KC roster before asserting vote eligibility.
Susie Wiles Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Public institutional White House correspondence channel.
Andrea Wynn Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Paolo Zampolli Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
Board Trustee Maria Bartiromo
c/o Board of Trustees
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
2700 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20566
Then repeat for every name.
For Maria Bartiromo and Laura Ingraham, Fox maintains unusually useful public feedback channels:
Fox News Viewer Services: 888-369-4762
Viewer feedback: 212-301-3028
Email: viewersfeedback@foxnews.com
Mail: Fox News Viewer Services, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.
she put her mouth directly on rowlings asshole
palantir isn't the only entity that can run a intelligence agency
ive been building osint for years
the internet..
Appendix A — Sources and References
Subject: Judge Andrew S. Oldham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Prepared: August 13, 2026
Method: Open-source research using government records, court materials, institutional records, contemporaneous reporting, and advocacy research. Advocacy sources are identified as such and should not be treated as neutral authorities where characterization or opinion is involved.
A. Primary and Government Sources
A1. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee — Nomination of Andrew Oldham
Source: U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Document: Nomination of Andrew Oldham to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit — Responses to Questions for the Record
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Oldham%20Responses%20to%20QFRs.pdf
Relevance: Primary-source confirmation material containing Oldham’s own written answers regarding his legal philosophy, precedent, Federalist Society membership and participation, and other issues raised during his confirmation.
Notable evidence: Oldham acknowledged joining the Federalist Society while in law school and attending its annual convention.
A2. Congressional Record — Senate Debate on Oldham Nomination
Source: U.S. Congress / Library of Congress
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: Congressional Record, Vol. 164, No. 121
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-164/issue-121/senate-section/article/S5039-1
Relevance: Contemporary Senate debate regarding Oldham’s nomination. Includes Sen. Richard Durbin’s opposition and discussion of Oldham’s Federalist Society membership, Texas litigation record, Voting Rights Act work, and refusal during his hearing to state whether Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided.
Caution: Statements by senators during nomination debates are political arguments, not independent factual findings. Underlying factual claims should be cross-referenced against primary records.
A3. Congressional Record — Senate Support for Oldham Nomination
Source: U.S. Congress / Library of Congress
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: Congressional Record, Vol. 164, No. 121
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-164/issue-121/senate-section/article/S5027-7
Relevance: Provides the affirmative case presented for Oldham’s confirmation and useful counterweight to opposition materials. Records his education, clerkships, ABA “unanimously well-qualified” rating, and endorsements from attorneys and public officials, including Democrats.
A4. Texas Attorney General — Confirmation Announcement
Source: Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Date: July 18, 2018
Document: AG Paxton Congratulates Former Texas Deputy Solicitor General Andrew Oldham on His Confirmation to the 5th Circuit
https://www.oag.state.tx.us/news/releases/ag-paxton-congratulates-former-texas-deputy-solicitor-general-andrew-oldham-his-confirmation-5th
Relevance: Texas government confirmation of Oldham’s employment history. Documents his service as Texas Deputy Solicitor General, representation of Texas before federal courts and the Supreme Court, subsequent service as Gov. Greg Abbott’s general counsel, Alito clerkship, DOJ Office of Legal Counsel service, and Trump nomination.
The Texas AG additionally identified Oldham as the sixth Trump judicial nominee who was a current or former Texas Attorney General employee, providing useful evidence of the Texas AG office’s role as a personnel pipeline into the federal judiciary.
B. Institutional / Professional Sources
B1. Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham Biography
Source: The Federalist Society
Entry: Andrew Oldham / U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
https://fedsoc.org/ttd-topics/andrew-oldham
Relevance: Institutional biography confirming Oldham’s professional trajectory:
Caution: The Federalist Society is an ideologically aligned organization rather than a neutral biographical authority. It is, however, a primary source regarding its own relationship and activities involving Oldham.
B2. Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham Contributor/Event Record
Source: The Federalist Society
https://fedsoc.org/commentary?author=andrew-oldham
Relevance: Documents Oldham’s continued participation in Federalist Society programming, including appearances discussing federalism, originalism, constitutional interpretation, and related legal subjects.
This is useful for distinguishing a historical membership entry from an ongoing professional association.
C. Voting Rights and Civil Rights Record
C1. Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights — Opposition to Confirmation
Source: The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Date: 2018
Document: Oppose the Confirmation of Andrew Oldham to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
https://civilrights.org/resource/oppose-confirmation-andrew-oldham-u-s-court-appeals-fifth-circuit/
Relevance: Detailed compilation of Oldham’s pre-judicial litigation record, including:
The report quotes Oldham’s Supreme Court filings and identifies underlying cases, making it particularly useful as an index into his pre-bench litigation history.
Important limitation: The Leadership Conference expressly opposed Oldham’s confirmation and is an advocacy organization. Its descriptions of Oldham as an “ideologue” or similar characterizations are advocacy positions, not neutral findings. Underlying filings and court decisions are stronger evidence than the organization’s conclusions.
D. Contemporary Reporting on Appointment
D1. Texas Tribune — Oldham Confirmation
Source: The Texas Tribune
Date: July 18, 2018
Article: Andrew Oldham confirmed to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
https://www.texastribune.org/2018/07/18/andrew-oldham-governor-greg-abbott-adviser-confirmed-5th-circuit/
Relevance: Contemporary reporting on Oldham’s confirmation, including:
E. August 2026 Mail-Ballot Litigation
E1. San Antonio Express-News — Texas Mail-Ballot Decision
Source: San Antonio Express-News
Date: August 13, 2026
Article: Texas can proceed with mail ballot ID requirements, appeals court rules
Relevance: Contemporary reporting on the Fifth Circuit’s August 2026 decision reinstating major provisions of Texas Senate Bill 1 affecting mail voting.
The report attributes the following language directly to Judge Oldham’s opinion:
“It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud.”
and:
“That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself.”
The report also explains that the panel reversed a district-court ruling involving the Americans with Disabilities Act and concluded that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a sufficiently substantial future risk of disenfranchisement.
Note: The actual Fifth Circuit opinion should be preferred as the definitive authority for Oldham’s language and legal reasoning.
F. Federalist Society Membership
F1. Oldham’s Senate Questionnaire / Written Responses
Oldham’s own confirmation responses establish that he joined the Federalist Society while attending law school.
He explained:
“I joined the Federalist Society because I enjoyed the speakers and debates they hosted at my law school.”
He also acknowledged attendance at the organization’s annual convention.
Primary document:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Oldham%20Responses%20to%20QFRs.pdf
This primary-source evidence should be preferred over secondary descriptions of his Federalist Society affiliation.
G. Source Assessment
The factual backbone of this profile is supported primarily by:
Advocacy organizations were used principally to identify litigation, quotations, controversies, and additional primary records. Their ideological conclusions were not treated as independently established facts.
The available evidence establishes Oldham’s education and employment history, federal clerkships, DOJ service, work in the Texas Solicitor General’s office, service to Gov. Greg Abbott, Federalist Society affiliation, Trump nomination, Senate confirmation, pre-bench voting-rights litigation, and subsequent judicial record.
The evidence reviewed does not establish that the Federalist Society, Leonard Leo, Donald Trump, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, or another outside actor directs Oldham’s judicial decisions. No such claim should be inferred from documented professional associations alone.
H. Original Article Prompting Review
Mother Jones
A Trump Judge Called Mail-in Ballots a “Threat to Democracy”
August 2026
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/08/a-trump-judge-called-mail-in-ballots-a-threat-to-democracy/
This article served as the starting point for the investigation. Claims concerning Oldham’s biography, institutional relationships, and earlier litigation history were separately checked against government, institutional, and contemporary sources wherever possible.
who tf is whitney web?
substack pays nazis, change platforms
im pretty ok with whole food customers dying of lettuce ass
this is so disgusting
i remember him sucking chinese cock when he said taiwan was a country
bitchass
a profile on the judge
stop asking, start demanding....
Eileen O’Neill Burke — short OSINT profile
Current role: Cook County State’s Attorney, sworn in December 2024. She runs the second-largest prosecutor’s office in the United States.
Background: Fourth-generation Chicagoan, raised on the Northwest Side. University of Illinois graduate; J.D. from Chicago-Kent. Her career is unusually broad: 10 years as a Cook County assistant state’s attorney → criminal defense attorney → Cook County Circuit Court judge → Illinois First District Appellate Court justice → State’s Attorney.
Political/prosecutorial posture: Burke ran substantially on restoring a more aggressive, professionalized prosecution model after Kim Foxx. One of her first actions was directing prosecutors to seek detention in murder cases and specified violent felonies.
The Saracco pressure point
[!IMPORTANT]
Saracco has now been prosecuted — but Burke’s office specifically declined to prosecute him as a felony. That’s the sharper accountability issue now.
Off-duty ICE agent Adam Saracco pleaded guilty yesterday, August 12, to misdemeanor battery for attacking 68-year-old attorney/activist Robert Held in Brookfield. He received one year of court supervision.
Brookfield police initially presented the matter to Burke’s office. Her prosecutors declined felony charges and advised that it was more appropriately handled as misdemeanor battery; Brookfield police then directly filed that charge.
Held repeatedly asked Burke’s office to upgrade the case. Former federal chief judge Ruben Castillo publicly joined that pressure, urging Burke to reconsider Saracco’s conduct and criticizing the difficulty victims were having obtaining accountability.
The especially useful fact now is that Saracco ultimately admitted guilt. Burke’s office nevertheless maintained that felony treatment wasn’t justified: prosecutors reportedly concluded they would have to prove Saracco knew Held was over 60, and said they rarely pursue aggravated battery solely because an attack occurred in a qualifying public location.
So for a letter-writing campaign, I’d frame the demand as:
“Explain why your office declined felony prosecution of Adam Saracco, what charging analysis was performed, and whether your office will adopt a different policy for future assaults committed by federal law-enforcement officers against Cook County residents.”
That’s harder to dismiss than simply “prosecute Saracco,” because the misdemeanor prosecution has now concluded.
Public official contact channels
These are official/public channels only:
🟢 High confidence: The most effective factual hook is not “why won’t you prosecute him?” It’s “why did your office refuse felony charges when presented with this case, particularly now that Saracco has admitted the underlying battery?” That puts the demand squarely on a discretionary decision made by Burke’s office rather than something she can answer with “the case was prosecuted.”
burn them alive
Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell
Office of the Attorney General
1 Ashburton Place, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
For correspondence specifically concerning transgender youth / gender-affirming healthcare, reprojustice@mass.gov is particularly relevant: Campbell’s own May 2026 advisory directs questions concerning gender-affirming care there.
OSINT profile: Judge Andrew S. Oldham
🟢 High confidence: Oldham isn’t merely a generic Trump-appointed conservative judge. He came to the bench through a remarkably concentrated pipeline: Federalist Society → Alito clerkship → Texas solicitor-general apparatus → Greg Abbott’s inner legal circle → Trump → Fifth Circuit. His pre-bench record already included aggressive positions against Voting Rights Act protections and federal regulatory power. His August 2026 mail-ballot language is therefore much more consistent with his established legal worldview than an isolated rhetorical flourish.
Basic identification
The Fifth Circuit itself confirms his current judgeship, while the Senate records the extremely narrow 50–49 confirmation.
The pipeline
His résumé is almost laboratory-grade conservative appellate-law grooming.
2001: University of Virginia, highest honors.
2002: MPhil at Cambridge; Truman Scholar.
2005: Harvard Law, magna cum laude. He was an editor of the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, a publication closely associated with conservative/originalist legal scholarship.
2005–06: Clerk for D.C. Circuit Judge David Sentelle, a prominent conservative federal judge.
2006–08: Attorney-adviser, DOJ Office of Legal Counsel, during George W. Bush’s presidency.
2008–09: Clerk for Samuel Alito at SCOTUS.
2009–12: Kellogg Hansen in Washington, specializing in appellate litigation.
2012 onward: Deputy Solicitor General of Texas.
Then he moves even closer to political power:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott → Deputy General Counsel → General Counsel.
In that last role, he advised Abbott and managed litigation in which the governor had an interest. Texas AG Ken Paxton specifically celebrated Oldham’s elevation to the Fifth Circuit and noted that he was the sixth Trump judicial nominee who was a current or former Texas AG employee.
That Texas legal network is worth paying attention to. It became one of the major institutional feeders for conservative federal litigation.
Federalist Society connection
🟢 Documented, not inferred.
Oldham has reportedly been a Federalist Society member since 2002, meaning this relationship predates his judgeship by roughly sixteen years.
And this wasn’t simply “I paid dues in law school.”
He has continued appearing at Federalist Society programming as a federal judge, including discussions about originalism, federalism and constitutional interpretation. The Federalist Society maintains an extensive contributor/event page for him.
Federalist Society — Andrew Oldham appearances
The broader institutional context matters: Leonard Leo publicly described Trump’s judicial appointments as advancing the Federalist Society’s project of returning power to states and limiting federal authority.
That doesn’t establish that Leo personally selected Oldham. I haven’t found reliable evidence supporting that stronger claim, so I wouldn’t put it in an OSINT dossier as fact.
Voting rights: this goes back
years
This is the piece I think matters most given the Mother Jones story.
Oldham’s record concerning voting restrictions predates becoming a judge.
While representing Texas, he defended the state’s voter-ID regime and attacked Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, the provision that required jurisdictions with histories of racial discrimination to obtain federal preclearance before changing voting rules.
In a Supreme Court filing, Oldham argued that the Court should declare the reauthorization of Section 5 unconstitutional.
That matters because Texas’s voter-ID law was subsequently found by a federal district court to impose an unconstitutional burden and discriminatory effects against Black and Hispanic voters; litigation over the law continued through the Fifth Circuit.
So:
[!IMPORTANT]
The 2026 mail-ballot decision isn’t Oldham’s first encounter with restricting ballot access. Voting-law litigation was part of his professional identity before Trump ever nominated him.
The August 2026 ruling
This is actually slightly different from what I initially expected from the headline you sent.
The new case concerns Texas SB 1, including restrictions affecting mail voting and assistance for voters with disabilities.
Oldham wrote:
“It has long been established that mail-in ballots are prone to fraud.”
and then:
“That is why voting by mail jeopardizes election integrity and democracy itself.”
That’s unusually categorical language for an appellate opinion.
The underlying litigation involved provisions requiring identification numbers matching state records, restrictions on people assisting voters, and restrictions on paid voter assistance/canvassing.
A district court had blocked nine provisions after finding violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and §504 of the Rehabilitation Act. The Fifth Circuit reversed. Importantly, much of Oldham’s ruling rested on standing, rather than finding every challenged provision substantively compliant with disability law.
Oldham also characterized the appellate court’s repeated intervention in the litigation as:
“an exhausting game of Whac-A-Mole”
to correct what he called the district court’s mishandling of the case.
That rhetoric is notable in its own right.
There’s another mail-ballot case
Oldham also wrote the Fifth Circuit decision invalidating Mississippi’s five-day grace period for mail ballots that were postmarked by Election Day.
The panel held that federal Election Day statutes require ballots to be received by Election Day—not merely cast by then.
That case went to SCOTUS, where arguments occurred in March 2026. The implications extend well beyond Mississippi because numerous states and D.C. accept at least some ballots arriving after Election Day.
So we’re not looking at one stray sentence.
There is an identifiable Oldham jurisprudential track concerning mail voting.
Other ideological indicators
His confirmation generated substantial opposition from civil-rights organizations.
The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights documented positions including his:
Alliance for Justice separately compiled his record and currently lists him among potential conservative Supreme Court candidates.
There’s another eyebrow-raiser from his confirmation hearing.
Asked whether Brown v. Board of Education was correctly decided, Oldham declined to give a yes/no answer. He also declined to directly answer whether voting discrimination still existed in America. That’s reported by AFJ, an advocacy organization opposed to his nomination, so I would describe the source accordingly rather than treating its characterization as neutral reporting.
His written Senate answers were more conventional. For example, he said that Roe, Casey, and Obergefell were binding Supreme Court precedent that a lower-court judge must faithfully apply.
The Fifth Circuit ecosystem matters
Oldham isn’t operating in a vacuum.
The Fifth Circuit has become arguably the most important conservative appellate court in the country. Reuters reported this year that it has repeatedly produced decisions to the right even of the current 6–3 conservative Supreme Court, resulting in SCOTUS repeatedly reversing or pausing Fifth Circuit rulings.
And notice the company Oldham keeps showing up with.
The Mississippi mail-ballot panel consisted of:
Andrew Oldham — Trump
James Ho — Trump
Stuart Kyle Duncan — Trump
The Fifth Circuit’s current calendar likewise shows Oldham sitting with Duncan and Cory Wilson, another Trump appointee.
That’s not evidence of coordination; appellate panels are assigned institutionally. But it illustrates the structural transformation of the circuit.
Network map
The useful OSINT relationship graph currently looks like:
Andrew Oldham
↓
Federalist Society — member since 2002, recurring speaker
↓
David Sentelle — D.C. Circuit clerkship
↓
George W. Bush DOJ / OLC
↓
Samuel Alito — SCOTUS clerkship
↓
Kellogg Hansen — appellate litigation
↓
Texas Attorney General’s Office
↓
Greg Abbott — Deputy GC → General Counsel
↓
Ken Paxton / Texas conservative litigation ecosystem
↓
Donald Trump — nomination
↓
Federalist Society-era Republican Senate — 50–49 confirmation
↓
Fifth Circuit
🟢 Every major employment/appointment edge in that chain is publicly documented.
Public contact / accountability surface
Because he’s a sitting federal judge, I’d keep any contact campaign strictly to official public judicial channels rather than hunting for personal addresses, relatives, private phones, etc.
His official institution is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The court’s public judges directory identifies him as an active circuit judge.
The Senate Judiciary Committee also maintains his original nomination hearing and written responses, which are particularly useful primary-source material:
Oldham's 2018 Senate Judiciary nomination record
Oldham's written answers to senators
Assessment
🟢 High confidence: I’d characterize Oldham as an unusually well-credentialed product of the modern conservative legal movement rather than simply “a Republican judge.” His career links the Federalist Society/originalist academic ecosystem, Alito’s chambers, Texas’s aggressive state-litigation operation under Abbott, and Trump’s appellate appointments.
🟡 Moderate confidence on motive: The evidence establishes his institutional affiliations and a consistent body of voting/federalism jurisprudence. It doesn’t establish that his decisions are dictated by Trump, Abbott, the Federalist Society, Leonard Leo, or anyone else, and I wouldn’t blur that distinction.
The really interesting next OSINT layer would be a decision matrix of Oldham’s major opinions—voting rights, abortion, LGBTQ rights, guns, immigration, environmental regulation, executive power, disability rights—and then flag which ones SCOTUS subsequently reversed or blocked. That would turn this from a biography into a measurable jurisprudential profile.
Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell
Office of the Attorney General
1 Ashburton Place, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02108
For correspondence specifically concerning transgender youth / gender-affirming healthcare, reprojustice@mass.gov is particularly relevant: Campbell’s own May 2026 advisory directs questions concerning gender-affirming care there.
minorities fucking over minorities will never make sense to me
Name Board role/status Public affiliation Public phone Public email Public mailing address Source Notes Called Emailed Letter sent Response / notes Brian D. Ballard Presidential trustee Ballard Partners 850-577-0444 ballard@ballardpartners.com 201 E Park Avenue, 5th Floor, Tallahassee, FL 32301 https://ballardpartners.com/about/who-we-are/ Direct professional contact published in public-government proposal. Maria Bartiromo Presidential trustee Fox Business 888-369-4762 viewersfeedback@foxnews.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.foxnews.com/contact Fox public viewer-feedback channel; route letter through Kennedy Center. Pamela Bondi Presidential trustee Public figure / former federal official c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Mary Helen Bowers Presidential trustee Ballet Beautiful training@balletbeautiful.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://balletbeautiful.com/about/mary-helen-bowers/ Public business email; Kennedy Center routing preferred for board matter. Hannah F. Buchan Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No verified direct professional channel found in this pass. Robert Castellani Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No verified direct professional channel found in this pass. Elaine Chao Presidential trustee Public figure c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Pamella Roland DeVos Presidential trustee Pamella Roland c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Patricia Duggan Presidential trustee Trish Joy Foundation 727-244-1029 200 Garden Ave N, Suite B, Clearwater, FL 33755 https://www.grantmakers.io/profiles/v1/461403949-trish-joy-foundation/ Public foundation contact from IRS Form 990 data. John Falconetti Presidential trustee / Treasurer Drummond Press 800-247-5361 2472 Dennis St, Jacksonville, FL 32204 https://www.filmjax.com/production-guide/production-guide-form/drummond-press Public business contact; Florida corporate records identify Falconetti as CEO. Emilia May Fanjul Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Jennifer Fischer Presidential trustee / Vice Chair c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Officer: Vice Chair. Use Kennedy Center routing. Lynette Friess Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Sergio Gor Presidential trustee / Secretary U.S. Government c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Officer: Secretary. Kennedy Center routing is directly relevant. Pamela Gross Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Lee Greenwood Presidential trustee Lee Greenwood / music business c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center routing for board correspondence. Kate Adamson Haselwood Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ No personal-data broker information included. Laura Ingraham Presidential trustee Fox News 888-369-4762 viewersfeedback@foxnews.com c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.foxnews.com/contact Fox public viewer-feedback channel. Dana Kraft Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Mindy Levine Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Lynda Lomangino Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Barbara Long Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Allison Lutnick Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Douglas Manchester Presidential trustee Manchester Financial Group c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing; business affiliation included for targeting. Laura Perlmutter Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Catherine B. Reynolds Presidential trustee Catherine B. Reynolds Foundation c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Denise Saul Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Dan Scavino Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Public institutional White House correspondence channel. Cheri Summerall Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Donald J. Trump Chair / Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Chair. Public institutional White House correspondence channel. Usha Vance Trustee (listed in 2025 litigation / 2026 board materials) White House c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://beatty.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/beatty.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/kennedycenter.pdf Included because current litigation names her as a trustee; verify against latest KC roster before asserting vote eligibility. Susie Wiles Presidential trustee White House The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Public institutional White House correspondence channel. Andrea Wynn Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing. Paolo Zampolli Presidential trustee c/o Kennedy Center, 2700 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20566 https://www.kennedy-center.org/contact/ Use Kennedy Center institutional routing.
https://limewire.com/d/g3CUd#fKaCyQVcrp
contacts
Board Trustee Maria Bartiromo
c/o Board of Trustees
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
2700 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20566
Then repeat for every name.
For Maria Bartiromo and Laura Ingraham, Fox maintains unusually useful public feedback channels:
Fox News Viewer Services: 888-369-4762
Viewer feedback: 212-301-3028
Email: viewersfeedback@foxnews.com
Mail: Fox News Viewer Services, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
2700 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20566
General: 202-416-8000
Toll-free: 800-444-1324
Membership: 202-416-8310
Membership email: Membership@Kennedy-Center.org
https://www.democracydefendersaction.org/news/the-kennedy-center-boards-latest-vote-to-shut-down-the-institution-is-unlawful/
can politicians just start fuckjng swearing and personally attacking people? the president can, can anyone else?
we need to make life unreasonably dangerous for these fucking cunts