It's quite alright, but the platform hasn't really grown in a while outside of its available catalogue. Gog galaxy is still in beta I think and it also still has no Linux launcher yet. Still good for the no DRM part tho
The issue is the platforms aren't competing, because shows can exclusively be on one platform only and you need to be subscribed to watch it, so you end up with the current landscape of services that instead of competing with each other make it so you need all of them to get a full experience. Alternative playstores might face similar issues, but you don't need to pay to download multiple stores and apps don't have exclusivity deals to one app store
One of the parties has to trust the endpoint. People can screenshot or forward you messages to other people unbeknownst to you, but you have to trust the other person not to do so, how is that any different from trusting another person that they choose a safe app?
The problem is people also don't want Labour, it's just the lesser evil, so instead of voting pro labour they're voting anti Tory. Id call that a failed election.
It didn't buy the format and then cancelled it, it did it purely by providing a more convenient way of listening to music than downloading mp3s, so yes, it's a win
I don't see the part of the article that mentions that?
I mean the evil corporation in Spiderman is "Oscorp" which is not very far away
But you do have time to complain
That's what "provide" already refers to..
It's quite alright, but the platform hasn't really grown in a while outside of its available catalogue. Gog galaxy is still in beta I think and it also still has no Linux launcher yet. Still good for the no DRM part tho
Not really, there's certainly a compromise where glasses level sized tech could be very appealing to a lot of people
Why does it need to be the open source version?
The issue is the platforms aren't competing, because shows can exclusively be on one platform only and you need to be subscribed to watch it, so you end up with the current landscape of services that instead of competing with each other make it so you need all of them to get a full experience. Alternative playstores might face similar issues, but you don't need to pay to download multiple stores and apps don't have exclusivity deals to one app store
One of the parties has to trust the endpoint. People can screenshot or forward you messages to other people unbeknownst to you, but you have to trust the other person not to do so, how is that any different from trusting another person that they choose a safe app?
The problem is people also don't want Labour, it's just the lesser evil, so instead of voting pro labour they're voting anti Tory. Id call that a failed election.
It didn't buy the format and then cancelled it, it did it purely by providing a more convenient way of listening to music than downloading mp3s, so yes, it's a win
Surprised Affinity Designer isn't under Ai?
I mean Adobe doesn't either
YouTube is having a lot of totally not anticompetitive "bugs" in these past couple of weeks
Well if they're going business in the UK they should be bound to UK laws
Muffin time!
Buy it for the convenience and for the good Devs, pirate it after if they try taking it away. You already paid for it
It's an asdf video. "I've got a pie! What flavour? Pie flavourrrr"
Lots of good shows on there - movies too, look up WolfWalkers
Eh, in a real world sure, but a lot of governments run on populism more so than capitalism. Just sell whatever will get you re elected.