@Remontoire@serenitynot The way they ghosted a customer is starkly comparable to the manner in how they deleted the #DuckDuckGo research project & deleted existence of the contributor without a word.
@Remontoire@serenitynot So it’s clear that #Librem intends to push the “privacy theatre” agenda to cash in on deception, rather than doing right by their customers.
Suppressing research into the privacy aspects of their products is clearly cause for distrust IMO.
A #DuckDuckGo audit project was created on the #Purism git repo. They spontaneously & silently deleted the whole project (data & accounts) without warning. They also said nothing after the sabotage. This was the project that was the basis for these findings:
@Remontoire @serenitynot The way they ghosted a customer is starkly comparable to the manner in how they deleted the #DuckDuckGo research project & deleted existence of the contributor without a word.
@Remontoire @serenitynot So it’s clear that #Librem intends to push the “privacy theatre” agenda to cash in on deception, rather than doing right by their customers.
Suppressing research into the privacy aspects of their products is clearly cause for distrust IMO.
@Remontoire @serenitynot I can attest Purism’s lack of integrity & lack of professionalism.
A #DuckDuckGo audit project was created on the #Purism git repo. They spontaneously & silently deleted the whole project (data & accounts) without warning. They also said nothing after the sabotage. This was the project that was the basis for these findings:
http://techrights.org/2021/03/15/duckduckgo-in-2021/
The project existed as an effort to test the merit/wisdom of the #Librem making #DDG the default search engine.