edwardrotik

u/edwardrotik@fedinsfw.app
0 posts · 22 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

Chiming in with a mostly off topic, joke response.

Bondage.

As a more serious answer, I'm not attracted to men. However, I lack a barrier to engaging in sexual activity with men. It doesn't bother me, as long as there's something else involved that does fulfill my needs.

Thus the joke answer isn't fully a joke. In my salad days, I would top men occasionally. BDSM is enough of a turn on that I could maintain an erection while working a submissive, if they needed to be fucked for their fulfilment. It was very difficult to achieve orgasm though. Most times I couldn't unless I had assistance in that regard from a woman.

If I were to ever get back into that scene, I would be far less willing to work with a man, but if I did it anyway, some nice leather straps and well chosen rope make anyone more attractive.

Thirty is no joke!

I'm not sure what I was involved in was a proper train. In my younger days, I used to be involved in the area group sex/orgy and bdsm circles.

You do that, and you get past the idea that sloppy seconds are a bad thing, though we were meticulous about condom usage unless there was a lot of work done to make sure everyone was STD free. There were only three fluid friendly events in all my time doing that kind of thing. Because of the requirements we had, those sessions were very small, with the biggest having nine people; and it wasn't a gang bang scene.

But, with condoms, I think the biggest train I was involved in was sixteen men, plus two women with strap-ons. One of those ladies had the kind of tool that inserted inside her as part of the design. First time I had seen one of those#

I enjoyed that kind of scene. Not my favorite way to play in groups, but as an occasional thing it was lovely. With condoms, I kind of preferred not going first. There's something about a pussy that really wakes up after a nice pounding, particularly if that includes a few orgasms. It sort of squeezes more, and everything feels softer inside, even through latex. Not that going first is a bad thing, it's no different than starting off with a single partner and putting in the work to reach that state. I just very much enjoy watching a pussy I'm about to be inside get fucked, with the person who has the pussy enjoying themselves (I phrase it that way because not everyone with pussy is a woman); it heightens arousal for me.

Then, when that glorious cunt is open for my cock, it feels so welcoming and alive from the first thrust. It really is different from group scene where you've got breaks in between that are extended.

But, I didn't play with anyone that wasn't a friend to some extent. So it may be that I would be less willing to use a pussy second, if the person or people ahead of me were total strangers. I phrase it that way because I know you ,OP, enjoy your hole being used; I tend to think of it in less impersonal terms, but you deserve to have your hole used like a fleshlight, even in writing.

Without condoms? I only went first one time out of those. It was with a lady that had asked me to help set it up because we were friends, and wanted someone she felt a little closer to, to go first and set the scene. I did go a second time where I came inside her, and a third time where I couldn't ejaculate (though I did orgasm that third time). It's harder to judge which felt better, as I stay very sensitive for an hour or so after ejaculation, and both follow up rides were inside that time frame.

She was very wet when I fucked her the first time. The second round, all that cum had started dripping out, and was foaming up a little. So it was definitely a more slippery fuck. It felt great though.

Comparing that to the other sessions where my first ride was after someone else had filled the pussy, I would say that fucking a pussy that's full of spunk is a different feeling from a wet and well pounded one. It's slippery in its own way that's not better or worse.

I've also been in the other scenario, being ridden by, or fucking, one pussy after another. Very powerful experience. I had (and still have) a lot of control over whether or not I ejaculate at the same time as orgasm. And can delay orgasm fairly reliably. That is a useful skill to have in group scenes. It's also very entertaining to a group watching. That was a relatively common event, so I'm not certain what my "record" was. I know one weekend evening I fucked every pussy there, a couple of those people's asses, and one man's ass; as well as some oral. I believe there were ten women present that weekend. It was a lot of fun, but I ended up rubbed a little raw, and with a case of blue balls from holding back ejaculation so much.

Thirty though! I'm a little surprised your pussy isn't still crying in a corner from the needing beating! Lucky you, and lucky train!

I have had some interesting moments.

One, I turned down. I had loaned a coworker some cash, and she suggested paying it back in trade. She did so while lifting her skirt to show her quite bare and wet pussy.

Another that I turned down was a neighbor that seemed to enjoy going without underwear while in the yard, bending over far more than necessary and watching for my reaction. She was under my acceptable age though. Legal, but I have firm standards about power dynamics.

One that I very much enjoyed accepting was when a friend of my mother's asked for some computer help. While not an expert, I knew more than anyone else she knew.

She had me open a folder "by mistake" that contained some very lovely pictures of her. She pretended to be embarrassed, apologizing. Then, as I was telling her not to worry, she asked if I had liked them. Then, when I said yes, she started undressing and said "then you'll love this." I did. I very much did. After a wonderful experience, she asked if I could actually fix her email. I did. That was much less fun, but as a reward, she knelt down under the desk while I worked and used her mouth to communicate her gratitude.

on Embarassed · c/ffnbps · 4 pts · 68d

Well, that's an exceptionally lovely set of genitals!

on Peak pleasure · c/nsfwgif · 1 pts · 78d

Could be urethral duplication, which some men are born with. It's not exactly super common, but it happens enough that it's not a shock to see it.

Could have been some kind of injury as well, but there's not much scar tissue visible

on Airin · c/pussy · 2 pts · 153d

She kinda reminds me of Billie Piper

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/askfedinsfw · 5 pts · 154d

Well, I was a precocious kid with access to good information, so I had heard of sex toys under other names. Dildoes mainly, as my earliest discovery of such things was in the early eighties and vibrators weren't a very common thing to see mentioned in books and magazines. They were out there, but hadn't filtered down into what I had access to. Marital aids was the other term that was used commonly as a blanket phrase to cover everything

But I didn't see a sex toy until I was maybe ten or eleven. My parents were next door, and I went piddling around the house out of boredom. In the spare room where my mom kept her sewing machine and dresser with bedding, I discovered what I later found out was a gag gift.

It was a double ended dildo. It was thicker than my wrist, and longer than my forearm I wasn't a tiny lad either. Rough guessing from memory, maybe two inches thick and maybe fourteen inches long. It was some kind of rubber, probably latex.

This was an enlightening find. I had seen pictures of naked women, including fairly explicit "beaver shots" as they got called. So, to my naive mind, this toy must be of a size that women liked, or why would my mom have it? But how in the hell would that thing go into a vagina?!

Obviously, such toys are actually used sometimes. But at the time, I was unaware of the amazing elasticity of the vagina, despite being aware babies came out of them.

Mind

Blown

Years later, when helping my mom move some stuff, we came across it. That's when she disclosed it had been a gag gift and never actually used. She had forgotten it was even there.

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/askfedinsfw · 4 pts · 154d

Hmmm, likely my ability to separate and mostly control ejaculation and orgasm. I can usually do either one without the other.

It allows me to have multiple orgasms without needing to stop, and it also allows me to ejaculate and keep going as well. The two together wipe me out for a good half hour or so usually. Sometimes I can stay in the saddle when both hit at once, if I'm careful. But it usually gets too intense, so I have to stop.

My record for ejaculations in one session was six. The last one hurt though.

Any time I've withheld ejaculation and kept orgasming, it reaches a point around the third or fourth where they happen so fast and close together, I can't count them.