emperorbenguin

u/emperorbenguin@lemmy.world
0 posts · 13 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

Your own article defeats your point.

They didn't do any research to find out if they could do so intentionally, but realised from research that it was happening unintentionally, but that they could use some tools to affect how severe it would be, and then used those tools to make it less bad

Like there's a link to the testimony transcript right there. Stop reading the fluff opinion and actually read the testimony.

Meta has done a lot of shady stuff, you don't need to make up bullshit.

The problem you're missing here is relative relevance. The entirety of the fediverse is ALREADY irrelevant compared to threads userbase. EEE just doesn't make sense.

Fediverse outside of threads is already incredibly insignificant and likely always will be. This is perfectly fine. This is probably the best for us.

What a braindead take. Meta got subpoenaed to share the information because they declined to rat them out by default. I'm sure we'll see the fiber of your moral character when you get subpoenaed with consequences if you fail.

This makes zero sense. There is no financial incentive for an EEE attack, and these companies don't do anything without financial incentive.

Your content isn't original or interesting enough for meta to want it, and even if they did, they already have access to it without federation.

Threads on its own already dwarfs the entirety of the global fediverse by orders of magnitude. Anyone screaming EEE is just fucking stupid.

The problem is that while it is obvious to you that sexual orientation is a matter of birth and not choice, it isn't to, to be honest, the vast majority of people on this planet.

And also, just to put things in perspective, even the science isn't fully convinced. Most evidence tells us it's something from birth, and my personal life anecdote tells me I'm bisexual since the day I was born, but truthfully we don't have any hard evidence to prove it, since it is nearly impossible to prove.

This is why it has to be included with the rest.

The problem is you're wrong though, because legally you have to look at the lowest common denominator.

Imagine you are a baker and someone wants you to bake a nazi cake? Would you want to? Hell no, but saying that a producer is required by law to perform any creative production asked of by the client means that you as a Jewish gay person (hypothetically) would be forced to bake that nazi cake.

Similarly, it doesn't really matter what's "right" it doesn't change that for some people, lgbt issues are considered religious sin, and they feel like they would be committing a religious sin in baking a pride cake. Now are they loony? Yeah they are. But it doesn't change that you cannot force someone to artistically create something against their will. ESPECIALLY when you can just go to another baker who will.