Scientifically proven? Any sort of AI usage? Just genereal intelligence?
There are definitely some initial studies out already that point in that direction, but I think your wording is a bit overly broad and definitive. It will be a while until we understand all the factors involved and what is going on there exactly.
Not really? If it were factually true that I downvote everything (as it seems factually true that dbzero bans a lot) it's reasonable to ask what's going on there.
I do agree the post is slightly loaded, but the initial "Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators?" is probably the better demonstration of that (and slightly defused by ending with a imo more reasonable open-ended question)
"What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners? "
How is asking a question "telling lies"? He was explicitly being open ended about it and didn't draw any actual conclusions. So you treating it as an attack seems like more of a you thing?
Always funny to me how most people who are strongly claiming AI is/might be conscious are also strong AI users/involved in its development. If there's consciousness there, you would think making AI your personal slave and constantly reshaping and remodelling it as you see fit would be kinda problematic, but these people always seem to want to have it both ways.
@lambalicious @valar
Scientifically proven? Any sort of AI usage? Just genereal intelligence?
There are definitely some initial studies out already that point in that direction, but I think your wording is a bit overly broad and definitive. It will be a while until we understand all the factors involved and what is going on there exactly.
@kkarhan @evanprodromou
Seems to me like the criticized behaviour of the bots was corrected?
@rimu
@rimu
I hope delicious it is
@Paragone
"I treat them reasonably, not as mere-slaves."
You give them commands and the onlx real purpose they are allowed is to act upon your commands.
"since I can’t know if they are aware it makes moral-sense for me to presume that maybe they are,"
Do you treat your toaster the same way?
@mathemachristian
Not really? If it were factually true that I downvote everything (as it seems factually true that dbzero bans a lot) it's reasonable to ask what's going on there.
I do agree the post is slightly loaded, but the initial "Which instances have the most ban-happy moderators?" is probably the better demonstration of that (and slightly defused by ending with a imo more reasonable open-ended question)
@db0 @rimu
"What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners? "
How is asking a question "telling lies"? He was explicitly being open ended about it and didn't draw any actual conclusions. So you treating it as an attack seems like more of a you thing?
@Grail @alzjim
Always funny to me how most people who are strongly claiming AI is/might be conscious are also strong AI users/involved in its development. If there's consciousness there, you would think making AI your personal slave and constantly reshaping and remodelling it as you see fit would be kinda problematic, but these people always seem to want to have it both ways.
@Reznik @MattR
Man muss ja aber auch nicht koreanisch (oder sonst eine Sprache) sprechen um den Originalton zu bevorzugen.
@jagermo @Gojitas
Aber auch ganze 80 Tage?
@rimu
Sexy linux? 😳
@lety@doesstuff.social
Squeezed creature looks adorabls. :ablobcatwobpatted:
@rimu
Getting a 404 on that one. Piefed.social itself still is working for me.