While I respect what you're saying, music as a whole is so broad that I feel you could only make those kinds of arguments for certain styles of music.
For example, jazz is one notable exception where studio album tracks are pretty much recorded in one take without overdubs and are "live" from the studio. Improvising is essential to the music, and musicians interact with the crowd when live. The crowd response informs the notes bring played in a way that would not be possible in a studio.
Certain types of rock also benefit from live recordings, where mistakes and imprecisions convey a certain excitement to the sound!
I also agree we don't need this movie remade. However, I don't think it's fair to say there are no ideas in the movie for contemporary audiences. There's a lot of subtext if you look past the religious layer! It really is a masterclass in horror
Thank you for clarifying. I misinterpreted the question, my apologies. Two movies that immediately come to mind:
Vampyr (1932) has a great double exposure sequence which no doubt would have been much easier to shoot with modern methods. Strongly recommended to fans of early horror movies. It features several shots that are both haunting and absolute classics.
Staying with the same director, Dreyer, The Passion of Joan of Arc would be another candidate. The camera angles in themselves are an effect and contribute to the oppressively disconcerting atmosphere. The way the set was designed with holes in the walls to allow for the camera to be placed in certain ways is genius. Modern methods would not have improved on this aspect of the film, but, on the other hand, nevermind CGI or effects, this movie features a bloodletting scene which could not happen today!
What a strange question. "What older movies made a good use of side stepping special effects?" Do you mean any of the stories which do not need such effects in the first place?
Also, special effects "holding up today" is in no way necessary for a good picture... There are many great films with dated effects.
Everything looks good to me, but I'd experiment with putting the fuzz sooner in the chain, either right before or right after the wah, personally. I'm not too familiar with the superfuzz circuit, but some fuzzes I would put before a compressor, also.
You are covered "100%" of a fee they pulled out of thin air. They've essentially invented a fee guide without any input from the different provincial dental associations. These invented fees are of course lower than standard fees. How would it ever make sense that a procedure would cost exactly the same across the country, from the fanciest office downtown somewhere, to a minimalist office in someone's house in a rural area? They chose to cover less than what the latter would charge.
It sucks that Sun Life is deceitful in presenting the plan and it's easy for them to paint dentists in a negative light. I'm sorry you're getting played like this, much like everyone else is!
While I respect what you're saying, music as a whole is so broad that I feel you could only make those kinds of arguments for certain styles of music.
For example, jazz is one notable exception where studio album tracks are pretty much recorded in one take without overdubs and are "live" from the studio. Improvising is essential to the music, and musicians interact with the crowd when live. The crowd response informs the notes bring played in a way that would not be possible in a studio.
Certain types of rock also benefit from live recordings, where mistakes and imprecisions convey a certain excitement to the sound!
I also agree we don't need this movie remade. However, I don't think it's fair to say there are no ideas in the movie for contemporary audiences. There's a lot of subtext if you look past the religious layer! It really is a masterclass in horror
Thank you for clarifying. I misinterpreted the question, my apologies. Two movies that immediately come to mind:
Vampyr (1932) has a great double exposure sequence which no doubt would have been much easier to shoot with modern methods. Strongly recommended to fans of early horror movies. It features several shots that are both haunting and absolute classics.
Staying with the same director, Dreyer, The Passion of Joan of Arc would be another candidate. The camera angles in themselves are an effect and contribute to the oppressively disconcerting atmosphere. The way the set was designed with holes in the walls to allow for the camera to be placed in certain ways is genius. Modern methods would not have improved on this aspect of the film, but, on the other hand, nevermind CGI or effects, this movie features a bloodletting scene which could not happen today!
What a strange question. "What older movies made a good use of side stepping special effects?" Do you mean any of the stories which do not need such effects in the first place?
Also, special effects "holding up today" is in no way necessary for a good picture... There are many great films with dated effects.
I agree with the other posters, nothing to roast!
Everything looks good to me, but I'd experiment with putting the fuzz sooner in the chain, either right before or right after the wah, personally. I'm not too familiar with the superfuzz circuit, but some fuzzes I would put before a compressor, also.
If you've never played guitar loud enough to get feedback from your amp, you're missing out!
Looks delicious! Now I feel like I could really go for a barleywine... Thanks for sharing!
Only 150 games? I'm pretty sure you could find many people with more experience than that at any FLGS.
C'est une très belle initiative, merci!
Very nice! Enjoy!
How are you finding the low friction pot? I heard it was easy to knock it out of position while playing, are you finding that to be an issue?
Merci du partage! C'est très bien résumé!
Forgive me for asking, but I'm not sure how this could be framed as subsidizing private practices?
In my mind, despite flaws with the program, relieving the cost of treatment for patients is worth it.
You are covered "100%" of a fee they pulled out of thin air. They've essentially invented a fee guide without any input from the different provincial dental associations. These invented fees are of course lower than standard fees. How would it ever make sense that a procedure would cost exactly the same across the country, from the fanciest office downtown somewhere, to a minimalist office in someone's house in a rural area? They chose to cover less than what the latter would charge.
It sucks that Sun Life is deceitful in presenting the plan and it's easy for them to paint dentists in a negative light. I'm sorry you're getting played like this, much like everyone else is!
Opti-Rinse is some good stuff, I second the recommendation.
Loafing the pictures. Looks delicious! Keep them coming, and thanks for sharing!
Thanks for sharing, the tone is dead on!
Très intéressant! Merci du partage!
Magnifique photo!
On y reconnaît tout de suite l'un des lieux de tournage principaux de La Grande illusion!
Merci du partage!