@joe@Snapz I feel like I have to address your libelous comment falsely smearing the entire medical field.
Medical professionals are literally required to keep learning as the field advances to maintain certification. This includes doctors, nurses, radiologists, etc. They actually are forced to keep learning.
I suspect many medical professionals would keep up on medical advances even if it weren't required because they, you know, care about their patients.
AI may have some utility in assisting diagnoses, but "way better" is stretching the truth far beyond the breaking point. I turned up these articles without even trying:
@joe @Snapz I feel like I have to address your libelous comment falsely smearing the entire medical field.
Medical professionals are literally required to keep learning as the field advances to maintain certification. This includes doctors, nurses, radiologists, etc. They actually are forced to keep learning.
I suspect many medical professionals would keep up on medical advances even if it weren't required because they, you know, care about their patients.
AI may have some utility in assisting diagnoses, but "way better" is stretching the truth far beyond the breaking point. I turned up these articles without even trying:
They paint a more complex, reality-based picture. Is AI better at image analysis? Maybe. Sometimes. Way better? Not yet.
I can't tell if you're being dishonest or if you're spouting off about things you don't understand. Either way, like, stop maybe?
@joe @mobyduck648 Yes, those studies definitely exist and aren't made up. /s