Not an alt and again crashing out on someone calling you out for using slurs is a bad look. Please try elevate yourself from the piece of shit you are at current.
I haven't interacted with you outside of pointing out your flippant use of slurs. The only piece of shit in this convo between me and you is unfortunately you, you designated yourself as such with your slur use. Again I hope you can do some introspection and better yourself. But again given you crashing out on me because you don't like me calling out your use of slurs it doesn't seem likely.
A contraction of a slur is still a slur. I hope you can reflect on yourself and become a better person but that seems unlikely. In the meantime have you considered fucking off?
If someone is refusing to wear a mask and you and your neighbourhood watch or vigilantes or whatever you want to call yourselves come together and decide this person is not allowed to make use of community spaces anymore but they decide not to listen (as they already are about the masking rules) what is the course of action.
“Enforcing this exclusion” is really broad. It has the underlying assumption that the situation is already violent, that there is a thing to enforce against someone who is “disobeying” the thing.
Word salad entirely dancing around the point that you brought up exclusion as a response to someone violating health recommendations like masking during a pandemic but entirely refused to engage with the fact that exclusion (especially from spaces) requires there to be action taken should the exclusion be violated.
I heard someone in east Germany talk like this, like they lost a war.
You'd feel like you lost a war too if your country went through what east Germany did during reunification. It can only be described as a looting leaving tens to hundreds of housands without jobs, security or prospects for the future.
Hating two things is not the same as putting them at the same level
True at the most basic level in the same vein of saying 2 things can be bad. Yes it is possible for 2 things to be bad but no one who ever says this ever means it in that way it is nothing but thought terminating cliche if not expanded upon. The same is true here leaving out the other major ideological power of the time leads the framing to the implication that it sits above the other 2 evils (who are then equatable in comparison).
and I mean to do no such thing
Even if you didn't mean to the way you chose to frame your comment clearly implies some level of equation between the soviet nondescript horrific crimes and the Nazis in comparison the the capitalist powers who are absent from your comment.
I don’t think you would claim that hating a lesser evil in addition to a grater evil is an example of trivialisation.
Again on a base level this is true but in the framing of your comment there is clearly a level of equation (even if unintentional).
It’s really not so crazy to hate both Nazis and Soviets
Putting the Soviets and Nazis on the same level is plainly ridiculous to the point that in many cases it constitutes a form of holocaust denial(or trivialisation).
Oh here it is! That’s blatantly anticommunist of you.
The Soviets were asked to intervene by the legitimate government of the time. The only people who call it an invasion are those who were backing the Mujahedeen (and later Isis and AlQaeda).
This is the result of someone who has not once even grazed the same room as someone engaging with theory not to mind engaging with it themselves trying to have a gotcha moment.
What are you talking about getting rid of "power" that is absolutely 100% not the communist stance. Communists don't even advocate for the abolition of government but for the withering of the state which is a separate apparatus that exists fused with the government in class society.
Yes I know Gao Zhen the weird evangelical. And again I wish Americans would do something about theirs instead of letting them run the country and back genocide to bring about the third temple or whatever nonsense they believe.
Do you take Christian evangelical on a self proclaimed mission from god to destroy China who speaks neither Mandarin nor Uyghur Adrian Zenz at his word
Or do you take the OIC and UN at their word that their were abuses not dissimilar to the US treatment of poc during a crackdown on terrorism (racial profiling and dragnet policing).
And if 2 do you realise it was quite literally a saintly response compared to the "free world" who in response to terrorism funded alqaeda, Isis, boko haram and more and then used them as pretext to destroy Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan killing millions.
If only the US would arest their weird evangelicals instead of letting them run the country and back genocide in the hopes of fulfilling their religious nonsense.
Beria has long been accused of luring hundreds of women to his apartment and raping them. Television footage of the dossier showed handwritten lists of dozens of women with their telephone numbers.
Not really the most compelling evidence, or really evidence at all. This is very clearly narrative manufacturingnas opposed to anything of substance.
This is better cited it cites: Gazarian, “O Berii,” pp. 142-143. I'm assuming it means: Suren Gazarian, “O Berii i sude nad berievtsami v Gruzii”. I find 2 issues with this, first is that this article is only ~40 pages so I'm unsure what they mean by page 142-143. Second is that it's a memoir style writing of Gazarian who was a former NKVD official in Transcaucasia who was arrested under Beria and later frees to aid Kruschev in his de-Stalinization which given what is known about Kruschevs secret speech (it was full of lies) as well as clear motive (for revenge for being wronged) doesn't bode well.
I will likely edit this comment after reading Gazarian in more depth.
Not an alt and again crashing out on someone calling you out for using slurs is a bad look. Please try elevate yourself from the piece of shit you are at current.
I haven't interacted with you outside of pointing out your flippant use of slurs. The only piece of shit in this convo between me and you is unfortunately you, you designated yourself as such with your slur use. Again I hope you can do some introspection and better yourself. But again given you crashing out on me because you don't like me calling out your use of slurs it doesn't seem likely.
I'm not the person you were talking to.
Unfortunately not surprising that an ableist asshole like yourself so comfortable slinging slurs would not take being called out well.
Maybe you would be more comfortable on X the neonazi app?
A contraction of a slur is still a slur. I hope you can reflect on yourself and become a better person but that seems unlikely. In the meantime have you considered fucking off?
Really not engaging with what I said at all.
If someone is refusing to wear a mask and you and your neighbourhood watch or vigilantes or whatever you want to call yourselves come together and decide this person is not allowed to make use of community spaces anymore but they decide not to listen (as they already are about the masking rules) what is the course of action.
Word salad entirely dancing around the point that you brought up exclusion as a response to someone violating health recommendations like masking during a pandemic but entirely refused to engage with the fact that exclusion (especially from spaces) requires there to be action taken should the exclusion be violated.
How do you plan to enforce this exclusion? Putting up a sign, physical removal (violence), non physical punitive measures?
It must be very interesting to know so little and just say things.
Even Solzhenitsyn's wife has come out to say that this is more a work of fantasy and folklore than meaningful historical record.
Haven't read this but I don't have high hopes seeing as it appears to be a "double genocide" theory advocacy work.
This book is garbage. It is an extended tabloid piece not a meaningful piece of academic work.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141009093707/http://chinastudygroup.net/2011/03/o-grada-review-of-dikotter/
I'd recommend looking into Robert Conquest and his bias (putting it lightly).
You'd feel like you lost a war too if your country went through what east Germany did during reunification. It can only be described as a looting leaving tens to hundreds of housands without jobs, security or prospects for the future.
True at the most basic level in the same vein of saying 2 things can be bad. Yes it is possible for 2 things to be bad but no one who ever says this ever means it in that way it is nothing but thought terminating cliche if not expanded upon. The same is true here leaving out the other major ideological power of the time leads the framing to the implication that it sits above the other 2 evils (who are then equatable in comparison).
Even if you didn't mean to the way you chose to frame your comment clearly implies some level of equation between the soviet nondescript horrific crimes and the Nazis in comparison the the capitalist powers who are absent from your comment.
Again on a base level this is true but in the framing of your comment there is clearly a level of equation (even if unintentional).
Putting the Soviets and Nazis on the same level is plainly ridiculous to the point that in many cases it constitutes a form of holocaust denial(or trivialisation).
The Soviets were asked to intervene by the legitimate government of the time. The only people who call it an invasion are those who were backing the Mujahedeen (and later Isis and AlQaeda).
Calling racism and dehumanisation "disagreement" and "free thinking" is a pretty fucked up framing don't you think?
This is the result of someone who has not once even grazed the same room as someone engaging with theory not to mind engaging with it themselves trying to have a gotcha moment.
What are you talking about getting rid of "power" that is absolutely 100% not the communist stance. Communists don't even advocate for the abolition of government but for the withering of the state which is a separate apparatus that exists fused with the government in class society.
Yes because we're living in the 1930's and not 2026, you are very intelligent. /s
I'm Chinese. I'm not American. Ally to who?
Yes I know Gao Zhen the weird evangelical. And again I wish Americans would do something about theirs instead of letting them run the country and back genocide to bring about the third temple or whatever nonsense they believe.
Please expand
Do you take Christian evangelical on a self proclaimed mission from god to destroy China who speaks neither Mandarin nor Uyghur Adrian Zenz at his word
Or do you take the OIC and UN at their word that their were abuses not dissimilar to the US treatment of poc during a crackdown on terrorism (racial profiling and dragnet policing).
And if 2 do you realise it was quite literally a saintly response compared to the "free world" who in response to terrorism funded alqaeda, Isis, boko haram and more and then used them as pretext to destroy Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan killing millions.
If only the US would arest their weird evangelicals instead of letting them run the country and back genocide in the hopes of fulfilling their religious nonsense.
Not really the most compelling evidence, or really evidence at all. This is very clearly narrative manufacturingnas opposed to anything of substance.
This is better cited it cites: Gazarian, “O Berii,” pp. 142-143. I'm assuming it means: Suren Gazarian, “O Berii i sude nad berievtsami v Gruzii”. I find 2 issues with this, first is that this article is only ~40 pages so I'm unsure what they mean by page 142-143. Second is that it's a memoir style writing of Gazarian who was a former NKVD official in Transcaucasia who was arrested under Beria and later frees to aid Kruschev in his de-Stalinization which given what is known about Kruschevs secret speech (it was full of lies) as well as clear motive (for revenge for being wronged) doesn't bode well.
I will likely edit this comment after reading Gazarian in more depth.
Literally what you're doing. 🤣
Don't enjoy your weekend.