@moody@Savagejen Well can be done on Gentoo (my systems don't have dbus, among few other things I tossed out).
Bit of an outlier distro but at least can install it from gentoo-built packages since few years ago, so less an outlier than it used to be.
@lord@france Ouaip, le !commu@instance ça serait un truc spécial à rajouter uniquement si on se retrouvais avec les groupes clairement séparé du reste coté espace de nommage, et à ma connaissance c'est pas le cas coté webfinger (qui est requis par Mastodon).
@liaizon@fediverse In a way, this issue lies on browsers lacking decent support for custom-schemes, stuff like handling multiple handlers and ability to know if the scheme is registered at all (so a fallback can be presented instead).
@moody @Savagejen Well can be done on Gentoo (my systems don't have dbus, among few other things I tossed out).
Bit of an outlier distro but at least can install it from gentoo-built packages since few years ago, so less an outlier than it used to be.
@lord @V4uban Like(favoris)/Dislike je pense.
cc: @dessalines / @dessalines
@lord @france Ouaip, le !commu@instance ça serait un truc spécial à rajouter uniquement si on se retrouvais avec les groupes clairement séparé du reste coté espace de nommage, et à ma connaissance c'est pas le cas coté webfinger (qui est requis par Mastodon).
@liaizon @fediverse In a way, this issue lies on browsers lacking decent support for custom-schemes, stuff like handling multiple handlers and ability to know if the scheme is registered at all (so a fallback can be presented instead).
Heck, it's even something that Mozilla was aware all the way back to 2010 and with the early Fediverse (OStatus) in mind. https://blog.mozilla.org/webdev/2010/07/26/registerprotocolhandler-enhancing-the-federated-web/