mcgravier

u/mcgravier@kbin.social
0 posts · 37 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

If you want to imply that communism is more friendly to the environment, I'll have to disappoint you.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_issues_in_Russia

Many of the issues have been attributed to policies that were made during the early Soviet Union, at a time when many officials felt that pollution control was an unnecessary hindrance to economic development and industrialization, and, even though numerous attempts were made by the Soviet government to alleviate the situation in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, the problems were not completely solved.[1] By the 1990s, 40% of Russia's territory began demonstrating symptoms of significant ecological stress, largely due to a diverse number of environmental issues, including deforestation, energy irresponsibility, pollution, and nuclear waste.[2]

DoD wanted a contract to help ensure starlink availability for fucks sake

Contract for civilian use mind you. Strapping starlinks to kamikaze drones is a whole different story

but whether the US government thinks it can be used as a weapon.

That's even worse because US government can change it's stance on starlink any time - which would be disaster for SpaceX

Starlink was specifically agreed for civilian use only. It's the Ukraine who tries to breach that agreement, SpaceX simply doesn't want to be accused of exporting weapons

Maybe instead of degrading your quality of life, you should place a solar pannels on your roof and make some money while also reducing your footprint far beyond what you see on the graph?

Or maybe you should press your government into diversifying from fossil fuels into solid mix of nuclear and renewable energy sources?

No! According to the eco propaganda you have to suffer in order to save the planet, which is a massive BS