If anyone hasn't already, you should read the opening to Kim Stanley Robinson's Ministry for the Future that imagines how this particular scenario would go. It's a terrible glimpse of things to come.
I agree, and very few people can afford to buy-in if they can even afford a home at all. Large scale solar should be the goal. However if you live somewhere that doesnt have the political will or funds to do this, it's still better to go solar at home than not.
So, their front-facing research sharing will disappear as well as any content that was exclusive to it. More immediately concerning, part of their internal network is going dark. When does this start to effect weather modeling then? Because the private sector very much relies on NOAA for its forecasts, they surely don't want this either, not that it would stop them but still.
Doomerism abounds for all ages, but it is certainly most harmful for our young people. Solarpunk could be an awesome tool here - giving them tools to envision a future where solutions are realistic and actionable can be very therapeutic. Imagine our kids working on arts and science projects for climate change instead of just being bombarded with only constant negative projections. They need to know the truth, but they also need to be given hope.
incorporating coffee grounds into the substrate for mushroom growth has been a common practice in the mushroom cultivation community for small-scale production
I can finally call it "research!"
new materials often demand new hardware systems. [...] we developed a custom extrusion printhead [...] extrusion printhead is easy to assemble, inexpensive yet functional, compatible with existing slicing software, and can be integrated into mainstream 3D printer control boards
🤯 This is what most papers on these miss. These materials have the potential to have a huge impact on small scale, local community solutions, but only if it's done like this! Incredible work.
This is exactly an argument Kohei Saito makes in his book Degrowth - even if we know the odds are slim, do we not have a moral imperative to try while we still can?
SUBSCRIBE! We need more textile perspectives for practical sustainability, especially re: aesthetics. I saw your arts and crafts comment and immediately related, this is exactly where American discourse in understanding and appreciation for Art falls apart (especially women in art). I think there's a real opportunity to harness this inherent entanglement in art appreciation and redirect an arts and crafts style that shapes a Micheal's discount tchotchke to be a sustainability focused work of art.
Very late to the party but I'm still working through Anatham by Neal Stephenson. I think it's solarpunk adjacent enough, in that it's hopeful and has a lot of the sustainability ideas in practice - but also showcases a side where things have gone very wrong. I highly recommend it! 🍄
I bought my bike for $800 in 2008 and it has followed me around the country. I'm hoping to add some power to it this summer, lots of life left in her!
If anyone hasn't already, you should read the opening to Kim Stanley Robinson's Ministry for the Future that imagines how this particular scenario would go. It's a terrible glimpse of things to come.
I agree, and very few people can afford to buy-in if they can even afford a home at all. Large scale solar should be the goal. However if you live somewhere that doesnt have the political will or funds to do this, it's still better to go solar at home than not.
I would like to subscribe to your newsletter, here's my payment: 🍄
Alternatively start with a pipeline.
This is too close to true with the USDA word ban it's painful.
So, their front-facing research sharing will disappear as well as any content that was exclusive to it. More immediately concerning, part of their internal network is going dark. When does this start to effect weather modeling then? Because the private sector very much relies on NOAA for its forecasts, they surely don't want this either, not that it would stop them but still.
"For a Silent Spring" whoever came up with that tagline, I see you, and you get an imaginary raise.
Doomerism abounds for all ages, but it is certainly most harmful for our young people. Solarpunk could be an awesome tool here - giving them tools to envision a future where solutions are realistic and actionable can be very therapeutic. Imagine our kids working on arts and science projects for climate change instead of just being bombarded with only constant negative projections. They need to know the truth, but they also need to be given hope.
I can finally call it "research!"
🤯 This is what most papers on these miss. These materials have the potential to have a huge impact on small scale, local community solutions, but only if it's done like this! Incredible work.
Ok, now they're just flirting with me
This is exactly an argument Kohei Saito makes in his book Degrowth - even if we know the odds are slim, do we not have a moral imperative to try while we still can?
SUBSCRIBE! We need more textile perspectives for practical sustainability, especially re: aesthetics. I saw your arts and crafts comment and immediately related, this is exactly where American discourse in understanding and appreciation for Art falls apart (especially women in art). I think there's a real opportunity to harness this inherent entanglement in art appreciation and redirect an arts and crafts style that shapes a Micheal's discount tchotchke to be a sustainability focused work of art.
Very late to the party but I'm still working through Anatham by Neal Stephenson. I think it's solarpunk adjacent enough, in that it's hopeful and has a lot of the sustainability ideas in practice - but also showcases a side where things have gone very wrong. I highly recommend it! 🍄