Aligned with this, there was a Oscars ceremony in which some comedian sang "We saw your tits" as the camera went over the faces of the actresses in attendance. It was played for laughs and I don't know the real intention of the comedian, but it opened my eyes to the appalling reality of normalized pressure on women to accept nudity on Hollywood for the benefit of powerful men. It felt so gross I always remember it whenever an unnecessary nudity scene comes up. And in GoT it was a lot of times.
Basically, it feels like: "do you want a career? Get nude because I say so, so everybody can see that you bend to my will. We will see you nude or else."
Points 2 and 4 drive me nuts. For 2 in particular there must be some rationale, but the amount of times I've needed to see something behind the dialog, to have to cancel after having navigated the filesystem... Just bonkers.
Zfs has built-in encryption that can be enabled selectively per dataset, which is handy for some private data.
Also, as long as you avoid raidz, you can now add/remove disks to a pool, and attach/detach mirrors too. That's much more flexible than it used to be.
Too bad raid1 from btrfs has not a zfs equivalent. You can to some extent replicate that via partitioning in zfs, but the simplicity of btrfs raid1 is great for uneven disks.
Has btrfs got its act together with large amounts of snapshots? It used to be a pain point.
Aligned with this, there was a Oscars ceremony in which some comedian sang "We saw your tits" as the camera went over the faces of the actresses in attendance. It was played for laughs and I don't know the real intention of the comedian, but it opened my eyes to the appalling reality of normalized pressure on women to accept nudity on Hollywood for the benefit of powerful men. It felt so gross I always remember it whenever an unnecessary nudity scene comes up. And in GoT it was a lot of times.
Basically, it feels like: "do you want a career? Get nude because I say so, so everybody can see that you bend to my will. We will see you nude or else."
Kudos to this actress for not playing along.
Points 2 and 4 drive me nuts. For 2 in particular there must be some rationale, but the amount of times I've needed to see something behind the dialog, to have to cancel after having navigated the filesystem... Just bonkers.
Zfs has built-in encryption that can be enabled selectively per dataset, which is handy for some private data.
Also, as long as you avoid raidz, you can now add/remove disks to a pool, and attach/detach mirrors too. That's much more flexible than it used to be.
Too bad raid1 from btrfs has not a zfs equivalent. You can to some extent replicate that via partitioning in zfs, but the simplicity of btrfs raid1 is great for uneven disks.
Has btrfs got its act together with large amounts of snapshots? It used to be a pain point.
My fave captain till today. And the doctor, a role for the ages.