This kind of phrasing often refers to EU raising labor and environmental standards. Nobody is labeled a Russian for criticizing flaws in EU governing, like chat control or free trade agreements.
I don't really get the sentiment here - what's happening is the standard development if a public good (that youtube kind of was before google purchased them) gets privatized. It's the same with communications (isn't AT&T great?), water, electricity, rail infrastructure and trains, roads - investors are never good for the public good. They're only good at lining their pockets.
The problem with that concept is that it's not efficient. Sustainable (i.e. car-free) settlements are dense to minimize distances while economies of scale naturally apply to farming. In the mentioned cases, the agriculture is more of a (costly) gimmick that adds to the cost of housing.
It's always sensible to look at ancient solutions that are more often than not better suited to solve the problems to modern solutions. Farming has always happened in concentric rings around the settlements, not interspersed.
However, parks that grow food serve an aesthetic function that might justify the increased cost.
I know this person is probably trolling, but it's just so low effort. They didn't even bother reading the post that would provide context to the comment they so thoughtlessly replied to.
We are the worst thing that has ever happened to this planet.
Harmful trope, and stupid too. They are the worst thing that happened to this planet, colonizers, capitalists, racists and similar scum that is. Humans are amazing and make this planet a lot more interesting, and beautiful. Remove the rotten apples, unspoil the bunch.
Besides the obvious conclusions, this case also shows how (state sanctioned) racism makes everyone less secure. The real perpetrator has not been caught and operated under conditions that minimized his risks for actual consequences. Maybe he wouldn't have killed Venice Parker if there had been a greater risk of discovery. So racism killed two people in that case.
On a different note - how tf could they fire your pregnant wife? Do you not have maternity protection where you live? What kind of colossal injustice is that?
The risk isn't derived from the technology but how it is used. The proprietary technology is used to prevent farmers from creating their own seed (including using copy right laws) while increasing their dependency on matching pesticides. Industrial agriculture is not sustainable - insect populations are dwindling because every square foot of landscape is sprayed with poison. GMO is used to further industrialize agriculture, e.g. by making crops resistant to poison, which in turn can (and will) be used more liberally.
Huh?
Higher dietary fiber intake is associated with lower risk of multiple chronic diseases, particularly CVD mortality, pancreatic cancer, and diverticular disease. Despite these benefits, intake remains below recommended levels worldwide. Public health strategies should promote fiber-rich diets, and future research should further elucidate the role of specific fiber types in disease prevention.
Isn't that what extensions are for? This basically already exists. It's a shame Mozilla doesn't utilize it for this
This kind of phrasing often refers to EU raising labor and environmental standards. Nobody is labeled a Russian for criticizing flaws in EU governing, like chat control or free trade agreements.
"EU idiocies" lol keep telling on yourself
I don't really get the sentiment here - what's happening is the standard development if a public good (that youtube kind of was before google purchased them) gets privatized. It's the same with communications (isn't AT&T great?), water, electricity, rail infrastructure and trains, roads - investors are never good for the public good. They're only good at lining their pockets.
Thanks, great comment that should be a post!
The problem with that concept is that it's not efficient. Sustainable (i.e. car-free) settlements are dense to minimize distances while economies of scale naturally apply to farming. In the mentioned cases, the agriculture is more of a (costly) gimmick that adds to the cost of housing.
It's always sensible to look at ancient solutions that are more often than not better suited to solve the problems to modern solutions. Farming has always happened in concentric rings around the settlements, not interspersed.
However, parks that grow food serve an aesthetic function that might justify the increased cost.
I know this person is probably trolling, but it's just so low effort. They didn't even bother reading the post that would provide context to the comment they so thoughtlessly replied to.
There are sins that can only be washed away with blood.
This is what they took from you.
Harmful trope, and stupid too. They are the worst thing that happened to this planet, colonizers, capitalists, racists and similar scum that is. Humans are amazing and make this planet a lot more interesting, and beautiful. Remove the rotten apples, unspoil the bunch.
Besides the obvious conclusions, this case also shows how (state sanctioned) racism makes everyone less secure. The real perpetrator has not been caught and operated under conditions that minimized his risks for actual consequences. Maybe he wouldn't have killed Venice Parker if there had been a greater risk of discovery. So racism killed two people in that case.
That's why you support projects like this: https://www.crowdsupply.com/open-tools/open-printer
and never ever buy a hp product.
If you kill a cyclist or minority pedestrian that is
I'd say their sneering distrust of everything has brought us to where we are now.
That really sucks. I'm sorry for you.
On a different note - how tf could they fire your pregnant wife? Do you not have maternity protection where you live? What kind of colossal injustice is that?
Go to di.day for more info.
The risk isn't derived from the technology but how it is used. The proprietary technology is used to prevent farmers from creating their own seed (including using copy right laws) while increasing their dependency on matching pesticides. Industrial agriculture is not sustainable - insect populations are dwindling because every square foot of landscape is sprayed with poison. GMO is used to further industrialize agriculture, e.g. by making crops resistant to poison, which in turn can (and will) be used more liberally.
If this person takes the risks of sickness and its life destroying consequences over the risks of vaccination, they're an idiot.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25011399 https://immune.org.nz/factsheets/comparison-of-possible-disease-complications-and-vaccine-responses
The equivalent of an architecture faculty member using an antique amphora as trash bin. Glad this was corrected tho, really beautiful square.