Perhaps it's a soulless girl combined with smartphone image "enhancing" AI. This image looks unnatural and her eyes are incorrect, and I see artifacts around the button of her pants and the license plate on the right. But the structures are remarkably correct indeed.
Hi, thanks for the post! I'm moderating this since there are anomalies on the girl's hips as well as severe errors in the background, which isn't in line with the "No deformations" rule.
Hi, thanks for the post! I'm moderating this since the girl's eyes, mouth and nails are anomalous, which isn't in line with the "No deformations" rule.
Be a bit more cautious with your assumptions, good sir. People can hold worthwhile ideas different from yours and express them in good faith in ways you're not familiar with, or be a bit clumsy with their language and make you get an idea they didn't intend.
I see mixed opinions in this thread and I’d like to understand what you think… Would someone be interested to explain where they disagree? Maybe because you feel that people are dismissing gender identity as less important than sex features?
Given the confusion, maybe the mods would be willing to clarify the sidebar text to make it less ambiguous.
I agree that the sex features are more important in this context, but gender also has this double meaning, according to
Cambridge Dictionary: "used to refer to the condition of being physically male, female, or intersex (= having a body that has both male and female characteristics)"
Merriam-Webster, which also has a usage guide for sex/gender (in nonmedical and nontechnical contexts, there is no clear delineation, and the status of the words remains complicated)
Perhaps it's a soulless girl combined with smartphone image "enhancing" AI. This image looks unnatural and her eyes are incorrect, and I see artifacts around the button of her pants and the license plate on the right. But the structures are remarkably correct indeed.
Keep AI-generated images in !aigen please.
Hi, thanks for the post! I'm moderating this since there are anomalies on the girl's hips as well as severe errors in the background, which isn't in line with the "No deformations" rule.
Hi, thanks for the post! I'm moderating this since the girl's eyes, mouth and nails are anomalous, which isn't in line with the "No deformations" rule.
Moderating due to deformed hand
AI gen.
Alternatively just look at a post's score
This works for all posts older than 15 minutes
You probably meant https://lemmynsfw.com/c/hypnogonewild instead of https://lemmy.world/c/spore XD
I'm a straight guy but have my upvote anyway!
Part 1: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/19966
If you're [m] you can also post in !nudedudes. (And get less downvotes from jealous dudes in !gonewild who can't handle your body 😛)
Be a bit more cautious with your assumptions, good sir. People can hold worthwhile ideas different from yours and express them in good faith in ways you're not familiar with, or be a bit clumsy with their language and make you get an idea they didn't intend.
I see mixed opinions in this thread and I’d like to understand what you think… Would someone be interested to explain where they disagree? Maybe because you feel that people are dismissing gender identity as less important than sex features?
Hi, thanks for posting. Could you tag your posts with [f] so that people know what they'll find before unblurring?
Hi, thanks for posting. Could you tag your posts with [m] so that people know what they'll find before unblurring?
Hi, thanks for posting. Could you tag your posts with [m] so that people know what they'll find before unblurring?
Given the confusion, maybe the mods would be willing to clarify the sidebar text to make it less ambiguous.
I agree that the sex features are more important in this context, but gender also has this double meaning, according to
Haha I might make this my style!
Gee, thanks <3
Just tactically hidden behind a branch, nothing special!