@evanprodromou I'm wondering why it isn't preferable for OpenStreetMap to provide this data directly. Since they are the stewards and custodians of the entire data set, it would only make sense that other people on the Web depend on OSM's domain instead of a third party, no?
@deadsuperhero Just because you disagree with some things, and you've been here from the start, doesn't mean someone doesn't know what they're talking about. And even if that would be the case, it's an unnecessary insult that makes the recipients of the counterarguments less receptive to whatever is being laid out below.
So if it's in good faith, then I think that's just a poor choice of title. Only wanted to point that out. Feel free to ignore it.
@evanprodromou I'm wondering why it isn't preferable for OpenStreetMap to provide this data directly. Since they are the stewards and custodians of the entire data set, it would only make sense that other people on the Web depend on OSM's domain instead of a third party, no?
@deadsuperhero Just because you disagree with some things, and you've been here from the start, doesn't mean someone doesn't know what they're talking about. And even if that would be the case, it's an unnecessary insult that makes the recipients of the counterarguments less receptive to whatever is being laid out below.
So if it's in good faith, then I think that's just a poor choice of title. Only wanted to point that out. Feel free to ignore it.
@NettoHikari Says a person who does unpaid work for Condé Nast? In order to prove the same point again? Cool.
@deadsuperhero Why the ad hominem in the title? Completely unnecessary, and actually proving his point about pettiness.