standard67_teatiller

u/standard67_teatiller@lemmy.ml
0 posts · 15 comments

Recent posts

No posts.

Recent comments

Yeah me too, I started putting those type albums under the artist , but movie soundtracks and other comps still get filed as compilations.

And for some bands I’ll include solo albums by members as part of the band discography (by putting the band name as album artist), since I would put them on the shelf that way if they were discs. Unless they have a long established solo career, then I don’t bother.

I let iTunes (now Music in Mac) automatically sort folders years ago and this is pretty much how it organizes files. Except for “Various Artists” albums it has a separate Compilations folder. Most tag editors I’ve used besides iTunes/Music have the tag available to tag something a compilation.

For VA comps centered on a particular Album Artist I sometimes just uncheck the compilation tag and instead of Various Artists, I put the main artist the comp deals with in the Album Artist field.

110% agree!
And it sounds great. I saw Bob a couple years ago in concert (probably for the last time) and while I enjoyed the concert, the sound was mostly crap. Overly loud, every instrument mixed to the same level, muddy, no ambiance. Likely a consequence of having to play large venues.

Poor Dylan’s voice was mostly drowned out on the louder songs, but at least we could tell no auto-tune was used and he wasn’t lip syncing.

Anyway, hearing the RARW songs live really made me appreciate the sound of the CD.

I’ve never given up collecting compact discs, buying paid downloads or collecting free downloads, then organizing my own digital library. The streaming apps mostly are ephemeral to me. I use them to check out stuff but not rely on, so I don’t waste time building playlists or adding a ton of albums. And the apps vary in usability.

Soulseek is a great application to find and share music files, i like it more than torrents which i swore off a decade ago. But I still like to buy most of my music, i just appreciate it more. And listening to CD’s on their own is great.

on Portable CD Players · c/hifi · 2 pts · 1y

I haven’t tried brand new players because they didn’t start making better quality looking ones until after I already had several vintage. The Moondrop Disc Dream looked interesting to me but I couldn’t justify buying it.

Sony or Panasonic are good vintage brands from the ‘90’s- early aughts.

I don’t use any of them portably, since DAPs are much better at that.

on Portable CD Players · c/hifi · 2 pts · 1y

For new players, you just got to read reviews and get one that seems worth it.

For vintage players, they all need an amp to sound better, so look for one with a line out jack. Old ass players from the 1980’s sounded better, but used like 8 AA batteries and had zero skip protection. More like portable desktop players.

I have had good luck with Panasonic shockwave series from the mid-late nineties . The shockwave players were water resistant and have a rubber seal around the lid, so that it keeps out dirt and whatnot . My favorite is the Panasonic Shockwave SL SW202, and 2nd favorites are the SL-SW860 or 890 (same player, different color scheme).