I'm sorry, but your plan is just letting Israeli perform another Nakba, and that's horrible. If that's the level of planning you're coming up with, we might as well just have the whole world militarily force Israelis out of the area. Making Palestinians lose more of their land is the last thing we want.
You could, you know, be less judgemental, especially for something simple like a favourite media franchise.
You're still refusing to acknowledge my point about why someone would consider it their favourite, and it has nothing to do with not expanding their perspective. It's you that refuses to expand your perspective beyond your own capacity to understand stuff.
Do I need to care what the plot is like? My favourite media franchise has a pretty terrible plot, as well. It's not the reason I love it. You seem unable to grasp such a simple concept.
Sorry, I think that "you" was left over from a longer sentence I shortened. I should've changed it to "they". But I don't get why you're being so aggressive, anyway.
So you're admitting the embargo isn't working and you should change tactics? Maybe stop giving the dictator more propaganda points by making Cubans suffer instead of only stopping them from making more weapons. Also, have you gone to Cuba or are you making that conclusion based on what you're exposed to in the US?
It used to exist for a good reason, the reason have dried up after decades of non-changing conditions. It's about time to stop punishing the people of Cuba for the actions of their dictators. You want to limit imports of weapons and weapon materials, go ahead, but the current oil restriction is simply non-justifiable.
Telling the people who are suffering under the direct action of the United States to not hate the United States is like telling Palestinians to not hate Israel or Ukraine to not hate Russia. Instead of advocating for fixing or reducing the source of the problem, you're telling the victims to fix their attitude, instead.
Where did I advocate for a dictatorship? Instead, I'm simply saying normalising a despot that dreams of becoming a dictator is wrong.
Embargoing Cuba didn't end the dictatorship and only made the people suffer, and normalising relations with the US right now won't solve that, given how many times the US have attacked their closest allies right now.
Cuba have also not shown they have the capacity to threaten the US right now, so the best thing is for the world to say no to the US instead of telling Cuba to suck up to them.
While you said you're talking about the US in the third person, your arguments are certainly rooted in the perspective of an American.
The best thing for Cubans right now is to turn away from the will of China and Russia, to foster good relations with the USA like the many other nations in the Americas have, so that normal trade relations can happen and their people can prosper.
At this moment in time, to tell people to foster good relations with the US while they act belligerently across the globe, sounds a bit like normalising the US's actions.
Then, I think you need to reword some of your comments, since most of it sounds like you're arguing from the US point of view, mostly due to the normalisation of the US as the voice of reason in this topic. From an outsider's point of view, the US has no right to continue embargoing Cuba decades after the conflict has already ended.
Maybe the US should be dragged out of the judge's seat, since they've been shown to have no capacity to be an impartial judge. Stop trying to act as if the US policing the world is a normal thing or even a good thing to bow down to.
I think familiarity affects how much it meets your expectations, not necessarily how consistent the world building is. Saying it is inconsistent either means the guy doesn't understand what inconsistent means or they think only things that meet their expectations can be considered consistent.
You are very judgemental and keeps repeating the same argument I've already addressed as to why someone can have their favourite franchise be something that is not the best thing they've ever read. I think you need to expand your perspective a lot more about the world. Being so narrow-minded is even more dangerous for modern society.
They kinda don't taste the same.
I'm sorry, but your plan is just letting Israeli perform another Nakba, and that's horrible. If that's the level of planning you're coming up with, we might as well just have the whole world militarily force Israelis out of the area. Making Palestinians lose more of their land is the last thing we want.
That's why nobody is self-hosting Plex's authentication server, they're hosting the Plex Media Server. I think you're getting confused.
If we return Palestinian lands to Palestinians, Israelis have to go somewhere, as well.
You're comparing the political agency of people in a democracy with those in an open air prison?
Hey, but no ad campaigns, though.
You could, you know, be less judgemental, especially for something simple like a favourite media franchise.
You're still refusing to acknowledge my point about why someone would consider it their favourite, and it has nothing to do with not expanding their perspective. It's you that refuses to expand your perspective beyond your own capacity to understand stuff.
Do I need to care what the plot is like? My favourite media franchise has a pretty terrible plot, as well. It's not the reason I love it. You seem unable to grasp such a simple concept.
Sorry, I think that "you" was left over from a longer sentence I shortened. I should've changed it to "they". But I don't get why you're being so aggressive, anyway.
So you're admitting the embargo isn't working and you should change tactics? Maybe stop giving the dictator more propaganda points by making Cubans suffer instead of only stopping them from making more weapons. Also, have you gone to Cuba or are you making that conclusion based on what you're exposed to in the US?
It used to exist for a good reason, the reason have dried up after decades of non-changing conditions. It's about time to stop punishing the people of Cuba for the actions of their dictators. You want to limit imports of weapons and weapon materials, go ahead, but the current oil restriction is simply non-justifiable.
Telling the people who are suffering under the direct action of the United States to not hate the United States is like telling Palestinians to not hate Israel or Ukraine to not hate Russia. Instead of advocating for fixing or reducing the source of the problem, you're telling the victims to fix their attitude, instead.
You do you.
Where did I advocate for a dictatorship? Instead, I'm simply saying normalising a despot that dreams of becoming a dictator is wrong.
Embargoing Cuba didn't end the dictatorship and only made the people suffer, and normalising relations with the US right now won't solve that, given how many times the US have attacked their closest allies right now.
Cuba have also not shown they have the capacity to threaten the US right now, so the best thing is for the world to say no to the US instead of telling Cuba to suck up to them.
While you said you're talking about the US in the third person, your arguments are certainly rooted in the perspective of an American.
I use Backblaze for that.
This one.
At this moment in time, to tell people to foster good relations with the US while they act belligerently across the globe, sounds a bit like normalising the US's actions.
Then, I think you need to reword some of your comments, since most of it sounds like you're arguing from the US point of view, mostly due to the normalisation of the US as the voice of reason in this topic. From an outsider's point of view, the US has no right to continue embargoing Cuba decades after the conflict has already ended.
I assumed by "we" and the "authorities" you meant the US, given how you've been arguing this whole thread from the American point of view.
You should re-read your comment before posting them.
Maybe the US should be dragged out of the judge's seat, since they've been shown to have no capacity to be an impartial judge. Stop trying to act as if the US policing the world is a normal thing or even a good thing to bow down to.
I think familiarity affects how much it meets your expectations, not necessarily how consistent the world building is. Saying it is inconsistent either means the guy doesn't understand what inconsistent means or they think only things that meet their expectations can be considered consistent.
You are very judgemental and keeps repeating the same argument I've already addressed as to why someone can have their favourite franchise be something that is not the best thing they've ever read. I think you need to expand your perspective a lot more about the world. Being so narrow-minded is even more dangerous for modern society.