Ok.. At least stop putting words in my mouth. And aside from what you're trying to do right now, there have been no strawmen in our conversation so far. Something not being illegal doesn't inherently mean everyone should do whatever that is. I'm not saying "you should do that but you shouldn't do that". I'm saying you shouldn't do that, but that is has to remain legal. As an example that I truly hope most people would agree with, cheating on your partner isn't illegal (most places), but it's still a really shitty thing to do.
We can definitely disagree on the social ethics around such jokes. As you say, you think such jokes are fine and I don't. And that's fine. I'm not advocating for censorship or anything like that. I think I've made it very clear that I think freedom of speech is important.
Yes. Again, we agree.. I'm both saying it shouldn't be done because it's bad, and that you should be able to do so because it's legal and freedom of speech is incredibly important. Those aren't contradicting statements.
Yes, we agree. You should be able to. No one should face legal action until an actual crime has been commited and joking isn't a crime. But that doesn't mean doing so is good. I did not say there are things you shouldn't be able to joke about, just that there are a few topics so serious and tragic that joking about them is bad.
That's fine. I think we'd get along fine if you don't make a habit of joking about killing kids, slavery, rape or animal abuse. If you think that makes me too sensitive then I'm happy to stay away.
Me thinking that joking about killing kids isn't ok makes me a fascist? I don't quite understand how you got to that conclusion, but ok.
To be clear, I didn't say people can't say what they want to. I think that freedom of speech is incredibly important. It's none of my business what you choose to say if I'm not involved, but I would not be comfortable joking around with such a serious topic. If you are, then more power to you I guess?
The relevant part of my reply was about mass surveillance being bad, and I don't think that's a very hot take. What I think about certain dark joke topics doesn't matter.
I believe there are a few things you simply shouldn't joke about. Killing children is one of those things. But yes, everybody has a fundamental right to their privacy and it's insane that mass surveillance is becoming more and more common and way too many people seem to just accept or ignore it.
Not just that.. I've met plenty of teachers that were almost completely tech-illiterate and that includes to some degree a few that even taught tech-related classes. Being a teacher doesn't magically mean you know everything, even within the field you're specialized in.
I mostly agree, but even if LLMs were 100% correct all the time (they're not), there are still some pretty serious ethical issues surrounding it. It is up to each person to decide if they find that acceptable or not.
Not if you follow the normal safety precautions for using the AUR. There are several things you can do to look for red flags, but the most essential thing is to read the PKGBUILDs. And helpers like yay, paru and Shelly can all show diffs which makes that much easier after the initial installation because in most cases you'll just see that the version and checksum has changed which means it's as trustworthy as last time.
This has always been the case, and will continue to be the case unless the Arch team restricts the AUR which quickly can make it lose exactly what makes it so good.
I tested this a few weeks ago, but one thing I struggled with was having custom fields imported. Don't know if I somehow did something wrong, but while the export data had them as expected, KeePassXC just didn't import it all? The standard Notes did get imported, but none of my custom fields.
While I believe most of their results originate from Bing, according to their Wikipedia page they have used over 400 sources including Bing, Yahoo, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler. And even if 100% of their results were from Bing, saying it's "just bing search" is very misleading.
The reason I specifically mentioned 4090 and 5090 is just that those are the only two cards AMD does not have an answer for right now. In all the other segments they have solid options. And to be clear, I really wish AMD was a real option at the top end as well, but they just aren't yet and looking at their best card vs a 5090 it's not even in the same ballpark.
My worry is that while I agree that AMD will have a 5090 competitor in a few years, Nvidia will also keep pushing unless they actually pull out of the market to focus on AI and datacenters (which they very well might do). Right now their lead is massive, but I could definitely see it getting much closer if nothing else.
This depends a lot on your definition of "high-end" in this context. If something like the RX 9070 XT falls within your expectations, you could definitely buy an AMD card over Nvidia especially now that their features like FSR is getting pretty good. But Nvidia offers cards like the 4090 and 5090 that AMD simply isn't even close to competing against, so if that's the kind of performance you want you're sadly stuck with Nvidia for the foreseeable future. Luckily, not that many people actually need something that powerful, but the point still stands.
Even Microsoft (probably) isn't that stupid or desperate yet. What seems much more likely to me is that they will keep introducing AI features and more invasive ads gradually and making them opt-in or removable with the intention of making them mandatory later on.
I 100% believe that Microsoft fully understands that a lot of people aren't happy with most of these changes, but profit must grow and they are elbow-deep in their AI gamble so they must keep pushing just slowly enough to avoid most users and businesses feeling like looking for alternatives is worth the effort. They are treading a fine line and are sometimes pushing too hard, but that in itself can be a solid negotiation tactic to manipulate people into accepting bad deals and my guess is that it's fully intentional.
I'm not the one you're asking, but I'm in a similar situation. I've attemped to get this working and the problem is that their Windows client must be downloaded and installed through the Microsoft Store and it's packaged in a way you can't run in standalone after extracting it. Some apps published through the MS Store do work fine this way, but I could not get it working for the Apple Music client.
Apple Music does have a web player, but it is also limited to lossy streaming like alternative clients like Cider is.
So.. Mostly good results actually. I tested the default profiles from the manufacturer and they seem ok. They are not as good as my custom ones on Windows for a couple of different reasons, but they are good enough to make me no longer see it as a major issue. Thanks again for the suggestion!
I also doublechecked the ArchWiki and according to that, ICC profiles are supposed to be cross-platform compatible and that profiling on Windows or MacOS and transferring the files over is a solution. But I've also read the opposite somewhere and my own profiles from Windows do not look great on Linux for whatever reason. So it seems that my own profiles from Windows are somehow not compatible, but ICC profiles fundamentally can be and that the manufacturer's profiles are in this case.
Personally I wouldn't mind having to profile/calibrate on Windows every now and then because I expect to keep it around on a separate drive for a long time yet for those use cases Linux don't meet my requirements, but sadly I did not get good results that way. Maybe I'll try different profiling software later and see if it's a problem with the Calibrite software.
For anyone having the same issues as me and finds this thread later: I would recommend dual-booting and profiling on Windows and testing those first. If they work well for you, great, else you can compromise a little and use the manufacturer's profiles if they are available and decently made. Hopefully it's not too long until we get a good native solution, but for now there doesn't seem to be any.
I would love some more details as well about why they found it so difficult. I tried it myself just now without really knowing how to, and it was pretty easy. You either find the option by searching, or go to Settings -> Accounts -> Other Users -> Add account.
They do try getting you to add a Microsoft account first and you have to choose "I don't have this person's sign-in information" and "Add a user without a Microsoft account" which is the only other option than Cancel at that point to continue, then you set the username and password and you're done. To be clear, it would be better if they immediately gave you a clear option between local user and Microsoft account, but I would hardly call it selling your soul and whatnot.
But Microsoft for sure deserve most of the complaints they're getting and it's only getting worse.
I didn't think of the "premade" profiles actually, thanks for the suggestion. Using the manufacturers own profiles typically aren't ideal as each display can be a little different even if they are the exact same model and they change a bit over time, but maybe that's the best I can get for now.
I expect them to have been created on Windows like I did with my own and as such will have the same problem because Linux and Windows color management are fundamentally quite different, but it is certainly worth a try. I will test that a bit later. It could never match custom profiles, but it could possibly be good enough.
Thanks for the recommendation. Qobuz has lots if things I would appreciate, but the last time I tried it it was missing a lot of the music I regularly listen to. It has only been a few months since then, but I will give it another try to see if it has changed.
Ok.. At least stop putting words in my mouth. And aside from what you're trying to do right now, there have been no strawmen in our conversation so far. Something not being illegal doesn't inherently mean everyone should do whatever that is. I'm not saying "you should do that but you shouldn't do that". I'm saying you shouldn't do that, but that is has to remain legal. As an example that I truly hope most people would agree with, cheating on your partner isn't illegal (most places), but it's still a really shitty thing to do.
We can definitely disagree on the social ethics around such jokes. As you say, you think such jokes are fine and I don't. And that's fine. I'm not advocating for censorship or anything like that. I think I've made it very clear that I think freedom of speech is important.
Yes. Again, we agree.. I'm both saying it shouldn't be done because it's bad, and that you should be able to do so because it's legal and freedom of speech is incredibly important. Those aren't contradicting statements.
Yes, we agree. You should be able to. No one should face legal action until an actual crime has been commited and joking isn't a crime. But that doesn't mean doing so is good. I did not say there are things you shouldn't be able to joke about, just that there are a few topics so serious and tragic that joking about them is bad.
That's fine. I think we'd get along fine if you don't make a habit of joking about killing kids, slavery, rape or animal abuse. If you think that makes me too sensitive then I'm happy to stay away.
Me thinking that joking about killing kids isn't ok makes me a fascist? I don't quite understand how you got to that conclusion, but ok.
To be clear, I didn't say people can't say what they want to. I think that freedom of speech is incredibly important. It's none of my business what you choose to say if I'm not involved, but I would not be comfortable joking around with such a serious topic. If you are, then more power to you I guess?
The relevant part of my reply was about mass surveillance being bad, and I don't think that's a very hot take. What I think about certain dark joke topics doesn't matter.
I believe there are a few things you simply shouldn't joke about. Killing children is one of those things. But yes, everybody has a fundamental right to their privacy and it's insane that mass surveillance is becoming more and more common and way too many people seem to just accept or ignore it.
Not just that.. I've met plenty of teachers that were almost completely tech-illiterate and that includes to some degree a few that even taught tech-related classes. Being a teacher doesn't magically mean you know everything, even within the field you're specialized in.
I mostly agree, but even if LLMs were 100% correct all the time (they're not), there are still some pretty serious ethical issues surrounding it. It is up to each person to decide if they find that acceptable or not.
Not if you follow the normal safety precautions for using the AUR. There are several things you can do to look for red flags, but the most essential thing is to read the PKGBUILDs. And helpers like yay, paru and Shelly can all show diffs which makes that much easier after the initial installation because in most cases you'll just see that the version and checksum has changed which means it's as trustworthy as last time.
This has always been the case, and will continue to be the case unless the Arch team restricts the AUR which quickly can make it lose exactly what makes it so good.
It's so bad.. If the thing being sold is legal then the payment processors and banks should have no say in it.
I tested this a few weeks ago, but one thing I struggled with was having custom fields imported. Don't know if I somehow did something wrong, but while the export data had them as expected, KeePassXC just didn't import it all? The standard Notes did get imported, but none of my custom fields.
While I believe most of their results originate from Bing, according to their Wikipedia page they have used over 400 sources including Bing, Yahoo, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler. And even if 100% of their results were from Bing, saying it's "just bing search" is very misleading.
The reason I specifically mentioned 4090 and 5090 is just that those are the only two cards AMD does not have an answer for right now. In all the other segments they have solid options. And to be clear, I really wish AMD was a real option at the top end as well, but they just aren't yet and looking at their best card vs a 5090 it's not even in the same ballpark. My worry is that while I agree that AMD will have a 5090 competitor in a few years, Nvidia will also keep pushing unless they actually pull out of the market to focus on AI and datacenters (which they very well might do). Right now their lead is massive, but I could definitely see it getting much closer if nothing else.
This depends a lot on your definition of "high-end" in this context. If something like the RX 9070 XT falls within your expectations, you could definitely buy an AMD card over Nvidia especially now that their features like FSR is getting pretty good. But Nvidia offers cards like the 4090 and 5090 that AMD simply isn't even close to competing against, so if that's the kind of performance you want you're sadly stuck with Nvidia for the foreseeable future. Luckily, not that many people actually need something that powerful, but the point still stands.
Even Microsoft (probably) isn't that stupid or desperate yet. What seems much more likely to me is that they will keep introducing AI features and more invasive ads gradually and making them opt-in or removable with the intention of making them mandatory later on.
I 100% believe that Microsoft fully understands that a lot of people aren't happy with most of these changes, but profit must grow and they are elbow-deep in their AI gamble so they must keep pushing just slowly enough to avoid most users and businesses feeling like looking for alternatives is worth the effort. They are treading a fine line and are sometimes pushing too hard, but that in itself can be a solid negotiation tactic to manipulate people into accepting bad deals and my guess is that it's fully intentional.
I'm not the one you're asking, but I'm in a similar situation. I've attemped to get this working and the problem is that their Windows client must be downloaded and installed through the Microsoft Store and it's packaged in a way you can't run in standalone after extracting it. Some apps published through the MS Store do work fine this way, but I could not get it working for the Apple Music client.
Apple Music does have a web player, but it is also limited to lossy streaming like alternative clients like Cider is.
So.. Mostly good results actually. I tested the default profiles from the manufacturer and they seem ok. They are not as good as my custom ones on Windows for a couple of different reasons, but they are good enough to make me no longer see it as a major issue. Thanks again for the suggestion!
I also doublechecked the ArchWiki and according to that, ICC profiles are supposed to be cross-platform compatible and that profiling on Windows or MacOS and transferring the files over is a solution. But I've also read the opposite somewhere and my own profiles from Windows do not look great on Linux for whatever reason. So it seems that my own profiles from Windows are somehow not compatible, but ICC profiles fundamentally can be and that the manufacturer's profiles are in this case.
Personally I wouldn't mind having to profile/calibrate on Windows every now and then because I expect to keep it around on a separate drive for a long time yet for those use cases Linux don't meet my requirements, but sadly I did not get good results that way. Maybe I'll try different profiling software later and see if it's a problem with the Calibrite software.
For anyone having the same issues as me and finds this thread later: I would recommend dual-booting and profiling on Windows and testing those first. If they work well for you, great, else you can compromise a little and use the manufacturer's profiles if they are available and decently made. Hopefully it's not too long until we get a good native solution, but for now there doesn't seem to be any.
I would love some more details as well about why they found it so difficult. I tried it myself just now without really knowing how to, and it was pretty easy. You either find the option by searching, or go to Settings -> Accounts -> Other Users -> Add account.
They do try getting you to add a Microsoft account first and you have to choose "I don't have this person's sign-in information" and "Add a user without a Microsoft account" which is the only other option than Cancel at that point to continue, then you set the username and password and you're done. To be clear, it would be better if they immediately gave you a clear option between local user and Microsoft account, but I would hardly call it selling your soul and whatnot.
But Microsoft for sure deserve most of the complaints they're getting and it's only getting worse.
I didn't think of the "premade" profiles actually, thanks for the suggestion. Using the manufacturers own profiles typically aren't ideal as each display can be a little different even if they are the exact same model and they change a bit over time, but maybe that's the best I can get for now.
I expect them to have been created on Windows like I did with my own and as such will have the same problem because Linux and Windows color management are fundamentally quite different, but it is certainly worth a try. I will test that a bit later. It could never match custom profiles, but it could possibly be good enough.
Thanks for the recommendation. Qobuz has lots if things I would appreciate, but the last time I tried it it was missing a lot of the music I regularly listen to. It has only been a few months since then, but I will give it another try to see if it has changed.